• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Chris/endemol/Emma /back peddling
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
lector
08-08-2014
Since the Creepy Chris week I simply cannot believe the protection that Chris has received.

Has someone put the frighteners on the producers?

Nauseating to watch.
walaboobah
08-08-2014
Yawn.
Theprodigal
08-08-2014
Hes still slightly creepy but Helen and her nasty pack of wolves are bullies.

And in BB Bully trumps Creepy.
Zycronic
08-08-2014
What are you on about?

Chris hasn't done anything wrong and the HM's have said nothing is wrong so why would they need to protect him?
Petula Gordino
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by lector:
“Since the Creepy Chris week I simply cannot believe the protection that Chris has received.

Has someone put the frighteners on the producers?

Nauseating to watch.”

It could be that his family have taken advice on how to handle things when Chris comes out of the house so that they can start to ‘clear his name’ but I haven’t noticed any protecting going on.

I notice that nasty Steven and his mother are ‘still’ sitting on the steps of the guillotine waiting patiently for Chris to come out of the house so they can finish the job and hang the poor guy.
Hermione22
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Petula Gordino:
“It could be that his family have taken advice on how to handle things when Chris comes out of the house so that they can start to ‘clear his name’ but I haven’t noticed any protecting going on.

I notice that nasty Steven and his mother are ‘still’ sitting on the steps of the guillotine waiting patiently for Chris to come out of the house so they can finish the job and hang the poor guy.”

Steven and his mother = Les Tricoteuses https://gabrieljaraba.files.wordpres...ricoteuses.jpg
Last edited by Hermione22 : 09-08-2014 at 00:38
silven
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Hermione22:
“Steven and his mother = Les Tricoteuses https://gabrieljaraba.files.wordpres...ricoteuses.jpg”

Glad to see Steven's hair has grown back (far right).
Penny Crayon
09-08-2014
I think the 'creepy Chris' storyline just died a death - that's about it really.

Other storylines came to the fore - notably the squabbling over money andthe lovers tiffs between Mark and Christopher.

There's no back pedalling or protecting - boring Chris had his moment in the limelight and became Creepy Chris for a while and more recently Greedy/Sly Chris.

Every dog has his day.
performingmonk
09-08-2014
If they wanted to protect him they wouldn't have shown any footage of him chatting with Ashleigh.
Captain Kipper
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by lector:
“Since the Creepy Chris week I simply cannot believe the protection that Chris has received.

Has someone put the frighteners on the producers?

Nauseating to watch.”

Or the jusified threat of lawsuits...or that they were disgustingly wrong about Chris.
ollieyork
09-08-2014
Emma glossed right over Chris wanting to give the money to his two friends, but made sure to mention Mark's eyebrow bar idea. Thought for sure that would have been shown or at least mentioned.
Petula Gordino
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by ollieyork:
“Emma glossed right over Chris wanting to give the money to his two friends, but made sure to mention Mark's eyebrow bar idea. Thought for sure that would have been shown or at least mentioned.”

Chris was going to share the money with Christopher and Ashleigh

However, Chris was spot on when he said that the winner was very unlikely to share the money with all the other housemates, he was being realistic.

How many families fall out over inheritance money.. ....everyone thinks it wont happen to them as they have a 'really close family' but when it comes to money...(As Dr G House says) everybody lies
Bunions
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Or the jusified threat of lawsuits...or that they were disgustingly wrong about Chris.”

What 'justified threat of lawsuits?'

WTF has BB done that's so terrible/illegal towards Chris that they could be sued over?

Is he going to sue all the folk in RL who call him creepy too?

Now if you were talking about 'dereliction of duty of care' or 'failure to protect' re Hazel, you might be onto something.
Petula Gordino
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Or the jusified threat of lawsuits...or that they were disgustingly wrong about Chris.”

Spot on
JVS
09-08-2014
I love the fact that Chris's fans keep reminding us that he was called 'creepy', I'd nearly forgotten.
Captain Kipper
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Bunions:
“What 'justified threat of lawsuits?'

WTF has BB done that's so terrible/illegal towards Chris that they could be sued over?

Is he going to sue all the folk in RL who call him creepy too?

Now if you were talking about 'dereliction of duty of care' or 'failure to protect' re Hazel, you might be onto something.”

Portraying Chris as some kind of weirdo that stalks young women and that he is a creep...that IMO is justification enough for legal action.

im not saying he or any HM should be "protected" but they shouldn't be demonised or wrongly represented on the show.
JVS
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Portraying Chris as some kind of weirdo that stalks young women and that he is a creep...that IMO is justification enough for legal action.
.”

Same old singer, same old song.
Bunions
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Portraying Chris as some kind of weirdo that stalks young women and that he is a creep...that IMO is justification enough for legal action.

im not saying he or any HM should be "protected" but they shouldn't be demonised or wrongly represented on the show.”

Ah, it's just as well then that your opinion don't amount to Jack.
dorsetwasp
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Bunions:
“Ah, it's just as well then that your opinion don't amount to Jack.”

Neither does yours!
Bunions
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by dorsetwasp:
“Neither does yours! ”

I know - hence why I don't talk shit about BB being sued over Creepy Chris
bunnyinthebox
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by ollieyork:
“Emma glossed right over Chris wanting to give the money to his two friends, but made sure to mention Mark's eyebrow bar idea. Thought for sure that would have been shown or at least mentioned.”

It has been glossed over for TWO nights running, not ONE SINGLE mention of it on BBOTS yet. Now that's what I call bias.
bunnyinthebox
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Petula Gordino:
“Chris was going to share the money with Christopher and Ashleigh

However, Chris was spot on when he said that the winner was very unlikely to share the money with all the other housemates, he was being realistic.

How many families fall out over inheritance money.. ....everyone thinks it wont happen to them as they have a 'really close family' but when it comes to money...(As Dr G House says) everybody lies ”

So would it have been OK for Ash to say he was going to only share it with only Winston and Helen? I think that might have attracted a fair amount of outrage on here.
Petula Gordino
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by bunnyinthebox:
“So would it have been OK for Ash to say he was going to only share it with only Winston and Helen? I think that might have attracted a fair amount of outrage on here.”

I think if Ash had said he was going to share it with Helen and Winston (who he is going to flat share with) I don't think anyone would have been surprised.

The thing is they didn't win the money (not really) because Ashleigh guessed wrong so talking about what 'anyone' would do with it was a bit premature (imho) and I'm guessing BB knew that all along which is why they thought up the task in the first place.

We all talk about what we would do with the lotto money but its not really 'our' money until we win it.
wonderwheels28
09-08-2014
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Portraying Chris as some kind of weirdo that stalks young women and that he is a creep...that IMO is justification enough for legal action.

im not saying he or any HM should be "protected" but they shouldn't be demonised or wrongly represented on the show.”

100% agree with you
orangeballoon
09-08-2014
the comprehension of what some people are watching... both as a show and what is on the show is stunningly poor sometimes...
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map