|
||||||||
Why hasn't Peter figured out it was Rob who killed Tina! |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 910
|
Why hasn't Peter figured out it was Rob who killed Tina!
It's so obvious!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,573
|
Why is it so obvious?
Rob had no strong motive to kill her that Peter would have known about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,840
|
Also poor Peter is so hung over in drink all the time...I would think it's impossible for him to think logically.. ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Is it so obvious? As far as mst people (including Peter) are concerned Rob and Tina had very little to do with each other and he had no real motive. Only Rob and the audience know she threatened to go to the Police about there being stolen goods in the shop. Plus, Peter has either been drunk or suffering withdrawal most of the time since Tina's death so he's not exactly thinking straight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Plus Rob has an alibi - Peter has no reason to distrust Tracey saying they were together the whole time, especially as Deardre is backing them up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 15,940
|
Peter's too drunk to notice anything!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The Dog In The Pond
Posts: 2,001
|
Quote:
Is it so obvious? As far as mst people (including Peter) are concerned Rob and Tina had very little to do with each other and he had no real motive. Only Rob and the audience know she threatened to go to the Police about there being stolen goods in the shop. Plus, Peter has either been drunk or suffering withdrawal most of the time since Tina's death so he's not exactly thinking straight.
Does anyone think she really would have went to the police about that, with her leaving and all? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,840
|
Quote:
Was Tina the only person who knew there were stolen goods in the shop?
Does anyone think she really would have went to the police about that, with her leaving and all? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 568
|
lol its only obvious to viewers if you ask me... Character wise it's already been said Rob had no motive, ok he's acting weird but so would you if you was with Tracey luv...lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Coventry, Warwickshire
Posts: 4,930
|
Peter's too busy with his self pity to think about who could have killed Tina. His thoughts are consumed by how much he's lost - Carla, the baby, Simon, etc - to consider Tina. It's like as Ken said, Peter considers himself a victim so his mind is centered around his own problems instead of who the real murderer is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 16,810
|
He probably has some degree of alcoholic neuropathy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Quote:
Was Tina the only person who knew there were stolen goods in the shop?
Does anyone think she really would have went to the police about that, with her leaving and all? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 51,659
|
It's a good question in fact. Weren't traces of Tina's blood found in the outhouse of Ken's house? Police informed Peter of this when they were questioning him : he knows that he is not the killer and surely he would suspect either Tracy or Rob.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,679
|
Quote:
Why hasn't Peter figured out it was Rob who killed Tina!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 7,096
|
Has the OP answered his own question yet? "It's so Obvious!"
It's obvious to us viewers - We SAW it happen!! But why should Peter realise it was Rob?? ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North East of Britain
Posts: 323
|
I still think it was Emily on a rampage.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,766
|
The truth will be found out by Detective Curly, so it will
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,931
|
Quote:
Why is it so obvious?
Rob had no strong motive to kill her that Peter would have known about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 713
|
Because all the evidence points to the fact that Peter did it himself
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,936
|
Quote:
Because, like most of the country, he's more interested in who killed Lucy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 13,749
|
Why hasn't anyone found that bright blue shopping bag which also has the murder weapon in it? Rob left it under a bridge near the canal, surely someone would have found it by now. Or will it be Ken and Eccles that find it, Eccles is living on borrowed time if you ask me, the dog has already sniffed out a charm bracelet
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,275
|
Quote:
Why hasn't anyone found that bright blue shopping bag which also has the murder weapon in it? Rob left it under a bridge near the canal, surely someone would have found it by now. Or will it be Ken and Eccles that find it, Eccles is living on borrowed time if you ask me, the dog has already sniffed out a charm bracelet
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,275
|
PS As for Peter, he's got enough to do by changing his personality as the script requires it. Self-pitying for his cell-mate and Sir Kenneth and then uncontrollable, shaking alcoholic as soon as I'm Jimbo so I am appeared. He just hasn't had the time to think who the murder might actually be!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,318
|
Quote:
Who's lucy? I must have missed that episode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kent
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
It's a good question in fact. Weren't traces of Tina's blood found in the outhouse of Ken's house? Police informed Peter of this when they were questioning him : he knows that he is not the killer and surely he would suspect either Tracy or Rob.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:35.




