|
||||||||
EE: Will Jac Jossa being up the duff lead to Lauren's permanent exit |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 111
|
EE: Will Jac Jossa being up the duff lead to Lauren's permanent exit
What's the betting, Jac Jossa won't want to come back beyond 2015?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cell Block H
Posts: 11,878
|
Why would she walk away from a well paid job with financial stability? if anything this will probably make her stay with EE for a lot longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The kitchen, eating a biscuit
Posts: 9,755
|
I can't see her leaving the show permanently. After all, there's only so many reality shows Dan can do and fees from his personal appearences won't give them much financial stability.
EastEnders pays very well, and she's probably earning a lot more than the rest of her friends. She'd be stupid to throw such a well paid job away. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
|
I hope so but probably not.
haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,304
|
If anything I think she'll stay for longer for the financial stability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: London
Posts: 957
|
I don't think she'll leave,I agree with others who are saying that she will stay for the financial support which is understandable
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,357
|
I doubt she will, depends what contract she on and if after she comes back from maternity the writers feel they can continue back were they was with her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 301
|
She'll stay (especially after her babydaddy cheats on her with a TOWIE co-star or something).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,401
|
Quote:
If anything I think she'll stay for longer for the financial stability.
That's why the older an actor is when they join a soap, the more likely they are to stay longer term as they've learnt how difficult and unstable acting is so are grateful for the financial security and stable home life a soap can give them and their family whereas the younger ones don't have that consideration, can move more easily (don't need to worry about child care, schools) and still have that dream / belieft that they could become an Oscar winner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,236
|
'Up the duff' ? Lovely.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,259
|
Jacqueline Jossa may choose to leave, stay or even be axed if the SL demands a Lauren and she's not available. She's just one of a number of actors in EE. If EE really want a Lauren, there are plenty more actresses out there including the original.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,932
|
She's ruined her life getting pregnant, so I doubt she'll want to lose her financial security. However one can but hope.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,444
|
Quote:
She's ruined her life getting pregnant, so I doubt she'll want to lose her financial security. However one can but hope.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,152
|
I don't see how she has ruined her life. She's 21. Not 15. She has a great paying job to provide for the baby.
I just hope they don't write the pregnancy in, as i feel a child for Lauren is not the way to go for her character. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
actors are funny about long term jobs, so ive stopped expecting them to stick to a regular gig, meanwhile im not sure a baby will make her crave financial stability in the way you might expect, you just have to look at her on screen mother for that, she had a baby, then didnt come back to the show for ages, then left again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sat at computer with heatin on
Posts: 45,573
|
her exit could be just temporarily..she goes off to see her mum, Tanya ? Then she can come back afterwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,152
|
Quote:
actors are funny about long term jobs, so ive stopped expecting them to stick to a regular gig, meanwhile im not sure a baby will make her crave financial stability in the way you might expect, you just have to look at her on screen mother for that, she had a baby, then didnt come back to the show for ages, then left again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,200
|
I couldn't blame her if she does dicide to leave for good. You work really long hours on soaps. More hours than the average job. So she wouldn't see much of her baby. Unless they let her work less hours. I hope she doesn't leave for good as I really like her character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,401
|
Quote:
I believe Jo took a year out, which is perfectly normal for any maternity leave. The actress who plays Kim has been on a long maternity leave as well.
Aslo, iirc Joyner's twins were the result of IVF so she is unlikely to have more, perhaps not surprising she wants to spend as much time as possible with them when they are very young. I imagine she'll start working more once they are firmly established at school. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,444
|
Quote:
Especially as she had twins. She was then back for 2 years and is quite possibly more financially stable given she is older with several good jobs behind her where she could have saved money and is also married to somebody with a decent wage.
Aslo, iirc Joyner's twins were the result of IVF so she is unlikely to have more, perhaps not surprising she wants to spend as much time as possible with them when they are very young. I imagine she'll start working more once they are firmly established at school. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,444
|
Quote:
Especially as she had twins. She was then back for 2 years and is quite possibly more financially stable given she is older with several good jobs behind her where she could have saved money and is also married to somebody with a decent wage.
Aslo, iirc Joyner's twins were the result of IVF so she is unlikely to have more, perhaps not surprising she wants to spend as much time as possible with them when they are very young. I imagine she'll start working more once they are firmly established at school. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,444
|
Quote:
I believe Jo took a year out, which is perfectly normal for any maternity leave. The actress who plays Kim has been on a long maternity leave as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,646
|
It may inspire them to make her soaps youngest matriarch!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 16,810
|
I'm sure she will be back
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:44.



haha.