• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Past Reality Shows
  • Celebrity Fame Academy
Unfair
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
Yule3
12-03-2005
I agree with Juicy Bug..it would have been better to host the final on another night. Tonights show was a shambles.
Moody Ms
12-03-2005
Originally Posted by Moondial:
“Yes, clearly Edith going first was totally unfair.

I presume in order to make it totally fair Kim should've gone first.”

Noooooooooo. The voting should have opened for 10 mins affter they had both performed. That way Kim fans would feel less cheated.
How Soon is Now
12-03-2005
Cat said the results were "so, so close". Without the "Colin" factor/and unfair text-voting I think Kim would have got this.

Still the GBP hate unfairness of any sort and I'm sure lots of people will feel cheated.

At the end of the day what a fantastic amount of money to be raised - but what a missed opportunity from the BBC. As Ade said, "If everyone voted now, we'd raise a million in a minute!"
Nic_A47
12-03-2005
Perhaps to make it more fair they could have turned Kims microphone off when she was singing.

Perhaps to make it more fair they should have limited Eastenders viewers to the same listening figures as the Radio 1 Afternoon show.

Last week when Edith was one first, she was in the last three - go figure.
Mesostim
12-03-2005
Originally Posted by How Soon is Now:
“Cat said the results were "so, so close". Without the "Colin" factor/and unfair text-voting I think Kim would have got this.
”

The results are always "close"...

I can't see what the fuss was...it was fixed for either Kim or Edith to win...it's no real surprise a BBC personanity won.......
rowdyprincess
12-03-2005
Im not sure how many of my votes for kim got thru i got 2 replies this morning but i know i sent loads more than that
How Soon is Now
12-03-2005
Originally Posted by Nic_A47:
“Last week when Edith was one first, she was in the last three - go figure.”

This doesn't make sense. When Edith was "one first" - what are you trying to say?
Nic_A47
12-03-2005
I meant ON first - Sorry
How Soon is Now
12-03-2005
Thanks ..............
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map