|
||||||||
EE Bets suspended on Lucy Beale's killer |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kent
Posts: 134
|
EE Bets suspended on Lucy Beale's killer
http://walfordeast.blogspot.co.uk/20...iller.html?m=1
Apparently, the Andre Vocase blog and the stuff on his facebook page and in Closer Magazine is the sole reason for all bets being suspended, but how can they do that? Surely people are entitled to bet on anything they wish (within reason) So, they are re-writing, allegedly
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
|
its not Jay - IMO he was off to see Ben and just happened to be on the same bus as Lucy
massive red herring |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 125,435
|
I would be very surprised if it was Jay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
This story is absolute nonsense.
"There's been a leak so we've been forced to pull the plug on the whodunnit market" In what way has there been a leak? People have placed these best as a result of what happened in last weeks episodes, and because Jay now looks massively guilty. That is not a "leak". |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kent
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
its not Jay - IMO he was off to see Ben and just happened to be on the same bus as Lucy
massive red herring |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kent
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
I would be very surprised if it was Jay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kent
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
This story is absolute nonsense.
"There's been a leak so we've been forced to pull the plug on the whodunnit market" In what way has there been a leak? People have placed these best as a result of what happened in last weeks episodes, because Jay now looks massively guilty. That is not a "leak". |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,462
|
well on paddypower Lola is the favourite and you can still bet on there
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 518
|
Quote:
its not Jay - IMO he was off to see Ben and just happened to be on the same bus as Lucy
massive red herring |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: East Street
Posts: 10,153
|
The public are more gullible than I give them credit.
![]() Jay went from 100/1 to 4/1. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,806
|
Leak indeed. How. Only the four people know who killed her, and the ending hasn't even been scripted or filmed yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
|
Quote:
its not Jay - IMO he was off to see Ben and just happened to be on the same bus as Lucy
massive red herring The fact he was off to see Ben, you can understand why he wouldn't want to say after all the Heather business. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kent
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
I agree, Jay was definitely off to see Ben. Which in my opinion will lead the next suspect being Ben.
The fact he was off to see Ben, you can understand why he wouldn't want to say after all the Heather business. http://whokilledlucybeale.blog.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,012
|
They're idiots
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The Sixth Circle of Hell
Posts: 20,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jedward Land
Posts: 3,483
|
don't understand pulling the betting. There hasn't been a leak it's just the gullible public betting on Jay after last weeks red herring episodes. If the bookies watched the show they'd understand this and cash in on the idiots betting on Jay just like they did on the 'Les did it' crowd after the ridiculous fanfiction appeared on the net.
And as for re-writing that is bollocks. DTC has planned this story through to Feb and will not be re-writing, although when it's revealed to NOT be Les or Jay the people who fell for the red-herrings/fanfiction will claim it was. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 317
|
When and why did Lola become the favourite?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nth East
Posts: 21,598
|
All that money they've now lost out on, as hes not the killer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 197
|
I think Alex is the culprit
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
Quote:
When and why did Lola become the favourite?
Having said all this I've not put money on her,
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
I think because all the 'secrets' i.e Purse and Phone buried on Billy's allotment, dodgy relationship with the sibling. Lola is only one of a few characters on screen that is looking shifty at the sound of her name. Lola is capable of accidental murder imo. Slight motive of hatred. Danielle could carry the reveal.
Having said all this I've not put money on her, ![]() She seems to have suddenly gone from having 66/1 odds - like most of the characters not involved - all the way up to the favourite without any big reveal that puts her in the frame. Perhaps the leak didn't incriminate Jay, but instead Lola. If that's the case, I hope they don't cancel all bets because of it. I've had a bet on Lola for a few months that'll give me a £470 payout if I'm right. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 16,810
|
I'm not even bothering to contemplate who it may be
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Darlo
Posts: 29,413
|
probably just publicity by the bookies if there hasnt been a leak they will reopen the book and accept bets again
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
|
Quote:
You're right about that, it's a red herring indeed, but the bookies have been deluged with bets on him being the killer. He's just scared of getting the blame (though he obviously knows that Ben done it)
I dont believe this story for one second - sorry |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Darlo
Posts: 29,413
|
Quote:
thats just the gullible public believing the red herring, no reason at all for the bookies to suspend betting - they dont loose anything when it turns out its not Jay (Im not a betting person so Im not 100% sure that Im right but I think I am) surely its more money for the bookies - not a reason to suspend betting
I dont believe this story for one second - sorry If the company believes that someone has insider information they would be committing financial suicide by carrying on taking bets on what is a foregone conclusion .The other bookies are stil ltaking bets on it though so either Ladbrokes has insider info or someone has panicked after a few heafty bets have been put on in the space of a short time |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:33.




