Originally Posted by lola_skye:
“Thanks for the thread DJ but I need to remind you that I've done three threads. Two were emergency, one official. One emergency was earlier in the year so you might not remembered it.”
My pleasure lola.

One of the emergency ones wasn't used.
Originally Posted by Scrabbler:
“Dear Dullagj2
I am not sure if you were aware of this situation but I feel obligated to bing it to your attention. On Thursday the 21st august it was the turn of Dullagj2 to create the episode thread.
This is an important task because the thread should be a place where the whole community can get together to discuss the episode in a dignified manner, usually with everyone expressing which characters they want to have sexy times with.
Sadly on this date in question the poll was not up to standard. For instance there was not even a poll, something that is expected with every thread. I personally think it's disgusting that there was not naked pictures of Declan Bennett to drool over.
I am unwilling to tolerate the lazy behaviour of Dullagj2 and ask that his names get scrapped from the list of reputable episode thread makers instantly. If you do not comply with our demands Dan2008 is going to streak across the streets of London in protest. If you do not want to see Dans genitalia dangling about then I suggest you get rid of Dullagj2 post haste.
Yours Sincerely
Mr Scrabbler Esq”

Originally Posted by Ice dragon1:
“Thank you for the thread. Great episode glad more Charile information is being revealed. Plus Nick at the end :”
Very welcome Ice.
Originally Posted by 0...0:
“Awesome thread Mr D!
Just realised it's not on BBC3. Why do they do this?”
Thanks 0...0.

I know it's annoying, is there much point showing it at 1:30 in the morning?
Originally Posted by dan2008:
“: Did you watch the same episode as me? :”
You were on BBC One right?
Originally Posted by guestofseth:
“Great post dullagj2, closest to my take on the episode. I don't get the problem with Charlie being a caretaker, it's not what the storyline has been building to all this time, that will all come out when Nick returns imo, it was just something that fleshes out his character. I really liked it, it shows that him and his mum are just normal people who have got caught up in whatever Nick's up to. It will make it easier for Charlie to settle in the square when it all blows over. As for Charlie's money, it could be drugs, it would tie in with both Nick and Lucy's storylines anyway, and I think Charlie was lying about stealing money from the home so his mother wouldn't worry about Nick still bothering them.
I think many are overreacting to a rather slow period of the year, I'm still enjoying it more than I'm not and it's still a hell of a lot better than it was last year. To be honest I'm baffled by the "warm bath or cold shower" thread as well, if it was this time last year then yes I'd understand it but while EastEnders might not be in "gritty Bafta" mode at the moment it's far from stuck in the "love and warmth" nothing's happening rut it was in last year.”
Thanks guestofseth.

Agree I'm still enjoying it and it's building nicely to a big Autumn/Winter/anniversary.
Originally Posted by MrJames:
“I agree wholeheartedly. It's had a few quiet moments over the Summer but all of the big stories are rumbling away in brilliant fashion ready for big climaxes in the coming months. I don't see what the problem is?”
+1
Originally Posted by Hit Em Up Style:
“I also agree about the Charlie story. I did keep saying he wasn't some big gangster drug dealer who was killing girls. I think so many people having crazy theories like that ruined it for themselves. But the fact he and Yvonne work in a carehome rings true. I also don't believe for one second Charlie is a bad man. I think he has just been caught up in a situation that has gone out of control.
I also think this serves as a lesson to the Lucy story. Her death and her killer will be the most simplest of things. Nothing sensational or far fetched.”
I foresaw a negative reaction coming. Firstly, the way it's been told means viewers want the pay off to be satisfying because it's been running for 5 months and secondly, I'm not sure there were many theories that would have satisfied some fans, people had built it up to be something it wasn't.
Personally I'm enjoying this story and all the twists and turns. I think he could be a drug dealer as he's flashed the cash on more than one occasion. It's always advancing and I'm positive there's more to come from this story, it's certain to run to the anniversary and beyond. It hasn't been paced too badly when you think about it.
March: Charlie arrives/fake funeral
April: Charlie/Ronnie sleep together
May: Dot doubts Charlie's a policeman/Yvonne debut
June: Ronnie pregnant/gives Charlie the brush off
July: Carol discovers Nick's alive/Charlie pays her daughter's debt
August: Max suspects he's bad news, Emma does some digging, Charlie worms his way out and is revealed as a caretaker in a care home, working with his mum. Nick attacks his car.