Everyone thinks it's Patrick, but could Nico's father actually be Dodger?

I mean, the first person Nico met in the village was Dodger.. so it only makes sense he is the dad. And with Sienna becoming so obsessed with Dodger, maybe it's because she wants her little family back.

Did Sienna have sex with Dodger when he was either:

(A) Drunk and off his head
(B) Sleeping
(C) Taking his shirt off - in which scenario, he completely forgets about anyone and everything in his surroundings as it becomes The Dodger Show.

This would be a weird way for the storyline to go, but hey, we're in Bryan Kirkwood land so anything works!

No just no. It would be too far fetched even for HO. What are the chances that two twins would meet have sex and forget. Then meet again years later for the 'first' time. You are looking too much into this and adding 2&2 and coming up with 2million.

Nico doesn't seem deformed in anyway to be the twin siblings offspring!

I agree.

No. Just no no and no.

For once I actually believe Sienna that she doesn't know who Nico's dad is. I don't think it's Patrick- he just made her feel ashamed and dirty. It's definitely not Dodger. The only reason Nico is connected to him so much is because she sees him as a father figure.

It could be she found him at 13 and he never knew who she was, Its why i came to the forum for first time in weeks.

Deformation happens rather if there's already illness in a family or child is a result of constant inbreeding. Otherwise , it's unlikely.
Still , please don't make Dodger Nico's father!

(8) Digital Spy Forums Sentence of the Weeeeeeeeek( 8)

Nothing is too far fetched in Hollyoaks.

Believe me, it's taken me a while to think like this.. but when it comes to Hollyoaks, it's usually some messed up crazy idea plucked out of nowhere.

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Calm down. Hollyoaks have got away with a lot worse!

I really don't think it's Dodger's baby or the idea that this would be sweet! We are talking about incest.

It's like before with Peri. Sienna got a crazy idea in her head and just went with it without question. She is convinced that Dodger would make a great father (and really who else in the village would volunteer?) so she becomes obsessed with him.

Remember when she first arrived she was under Patrick's spell, saying that he was all she needed and she was all he needed. But the spell has been broken, partly by Maxine's abuse but also because of the betrayal over Nico. Now Sienna has a daughter she can break free of being trapped as a teenage girl.

Sienna latches on to any chance of escaping her father and getting her nuclear family. The obsession with Dodger is part of that.

I don't think that the father story will be left at 'he was a randomer'. Even if it was a randomer, there'll be more to the story.

It could of happened I suppose. They were both at a party drunk (despite only being 13) not knowing they were twins so they slept together. And Sienna said she had no clue who the father is. So it's not out of the realms of possibility.

How DISGUSTING would that be??
I hope Hollyoaks don't go down that road.

No they haven't. A product of twincest? What's worse than that? Nico would have obvious deformed features.

This is Bryan Kirkwood so its probably going to happen. He retcons history at the drop of a hat to suit whatever storyline is playing out that week.

I'm hoping that's a step to far even for him. Still not sure how/why he re-worked Darren's parentage.

I don't think he'd do it; it would be too confusing for the audience. The only reason he did it with the Roscoes is to try and validate them and give them links. But as neither they nor Darren would care if they left, it was all a bit pointless.

god i hope not

The only person that definitely isn't the father is Tom. Just because something is possible doesn't make it likely. It's possible that Freddie Roscoe is the father; that doesn't make it likely.