• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Get Kim Medcalf back as Sam Mitchell once and for all!
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Hildaonpluto
24-08-2014
For me personally despite growing up in the era that Daniella was Sam for me Kim is my favourite Sam.Prior to Kim Sam was never a character I had too much interest or fondness for.I didnt dislike the character not at all but I was always more of a Sharon,Kathy,Pauline,Mel kindof boy and Sam wasnt high on my list of characters I was invested in.
For me this all changed when Kim Medcalf was cast,Sam very quickly became a characterI was interested in,rooted for and enaged with.One of my favourite iconic EastEnders moments of all time was the three witches conspiracy over Dens murder between Chrissie,Sam and Zoe.For me those scenes in the queen vic are iconic and perhaps Im being unfair but I just cannot imagine those iconic scenes being played by Daniella.Kim played it to perfection.
I feel very sorry for Daniella in some ways but from the perspective of the show I dont want her back as San.
0...0
24-08-2014
Yes, I really liked that portrayal of Sam and I do agree with you. I loved her when she was trying to outwit Chrissie and when she dug up Den. Ello Den!

BTW I love your username. It makes me think of Mrs Ogden in a space suit!
Hildaonpluto
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by 0...0:
“Yes, I really liked that portrayal of Sam and I do agree with you. I loved her when she was trying to outwit Chrissie and when she dug up Den. Ello Den!

BTW I love your username. It makes me think of Mrs Ogden in a space suit!”

Thank You!I love your take on my username and if it makes you giggle......

Now is not the right time for a Sam return but when it is I hope the red carpet is rolled out for Ms Metcalf
0...0
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by Hildaonpluto:
“Thank You!I love your take on my username and if it makes you giggle......

Now is not the right time for a Sam return but when it is I hope the red carpet is rolled out for Ms Metcalf”

I thought that's the image you were going for!
What does it mean if you don't mind me asking?
Hildaonpluto
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by 0...0:
“I thought that's the image you were going for!
What does it mean if you don't mind me asking?”

It means an eccentric older woman called Hilda is trying to positively influence the universe from a very cold place!Pluto is also ambigous its kind of an outsider to the other planets because some scientists dispute its really a planet -by classification.Thats all there in the mix!
Stube
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by james_killroy:
“Danniella was Sam just like Melissa was Lucy. What was disrespectful was recasting the role in the first place. They only reason Kim lasted is because Bab's was forced into a break through illness and Steve went on a 12 month break. So to keep the Mitchell's in the show they used Sam but Kim was always out of her depth. She had zero chemistry with any of her screen family. When Steve, Ross and Bab's returned in 2005, Kim looked like an imposter and very much out of place. Kim had no chemistry with Sid Owen which caused their 2002 planned reunion to be dropped completely and in turn resulted in the correct decision to bring back Danniella in 2009.

Danniella's second return in 2010 was so much better than the 2009 one. Kirkwood wanted her back full time but Danniella moved to America for that period so couldn't.

Maybe once Danniella is back on her feet DTC will bring her back. He also said she was his Sam. Seems like alot on the show never believed in Kim.”

How was it disrespectful? Yes it is extremely sad what ha(d/s) happened to Danniella but EE is a show at the end of the day and Sam was/is a major character. Danniella had three chances with the show and blew all of them. She's clearly not reliable enough to commit to a soap therefore a recast is the only option. The producers shouldn't have to leave a massive character with huge potential in the past just because the original actor cannot return.

I really like Danniella as a person but she's out of her depth as Sam. You might argue that she's the original Sam but Danniella isn't the same person she was in 1990. Drugs have probably affected her acting skills.
0...0
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by Hildaonpluto:
“It means an eccentric older woman called Hilda is trying to positively influence the universe from a very cold place!Pluto is also ambigous its kind of an outsider to the other planets because some scientists dispute its really a planet -by classification.Thats all there in the mix!”

I like it! Is this a novel in the making?
Can she have some flying ducks in there?
benbenalen
24-08-2014
Kim was my fave! Didn't she win an award for best new comer on the BSA?

Daniella won't be winning any awards!
Hildaonpluto
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by 0...0:
“I like it! Is this a novel in the making?
Can she have some flying ducks in there?”

Possibly!Although no flying ducks Im afraid!I can promise any novel of mine would have much more bizarre doses of stuff than that!
ewoodie
24-08-2014
I can't see why re-casting a role is in any way disrespectful. If EE wants to bring back Sam Mitchell, then it's their choice depending on who is available. Even if they decided on a new actress, there's nothing wrong in it.
Stube
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by ewoodie:
“I can't see why re-casting a role is in any way disrespectful. If EE wants to bring back Sam Mitchell, then it's their choice depending on who is available. Even if they decided on a new actress, there's nothing wrong in it.”

To be honest I don't think it's a black or white situation.

I think it can be disrespectful if the original actor did a great job and impressed the EP who created the character. If a new EP was then employed and wanted to recast that character for no valid reason then I think it's disrespectful.

Regarding the Sam Mitchell recasting, there's nothing disrespectful about it. Danniella was given multiple chances and none of them worked out. No point flogging a dead horse when there are others out there.
dantay24uk
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by Stube:
“No point flogging a dead horse when there are others out there.”

Dead horses?
ewoodie
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by Stube:
“To be honest I don't think it's a black or white situation.

I think it can be disrespectful if the original actor did a great job and impressed the EP who created the character. If a new EP was then employed and wanted to recast that character for no valid reason then I think it's disrespectful.

Regarding the Sam Mitchell recasting, there's nothing disrespectful about it. Danniella was given multiple chances and none of them worked out. No point flogging a dead horse when there are others out there.”

That would be bad! Has it happened? What about the recasting of Lauren Branning? Broadly speaking and in the case of Sam Mitchell, I can't see anything wrong if no one is playing the role. Although EE has sent characters away for a while then recast.
Fudd
24-08-2014
Kim's Sam showed natural progression during her time in the show. She matured but she was still the same Sam underneath. Daniella's return as Sam was a regression; everything she had learned in Spain and during her previous time in Albert Square had been completely forgotten. It's as though the Kim Medcalf era hadn't happened and, yes, it was slightly insulting to Kim but the main insult was to the audience who had to accept that Sam went away with emotional maturity and somehow returned with the mentality of a lovesick, desperate teenager.
welshboy89
24-08-2014
Originally Posted by starry_rune:
“Sadly the Sam ship has sailed.

bringing back Kim would be a joke now and very disrespectful to Daniella. Why kick someone while shes down? She will bounce back like before. Drug addiction is something that exists and can't be ignored. Sharon fills this role now.

Bringing back Daniella will just lead to another chav mum and this role is already filled by Lola, Bianca, Kat.

Another recast would alienate viewers

killing her off is an option but its too soon after Lucy.”

Sam's character I feel is done , this is the only option i think.

I loved Kim as Sam she was so classy and professional , I think them bringing back Daniella as the role was a huge mistake Diederick Santer ever made during his time as Exec. Producer.

Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Kim's Sam showed natural progression during her time in the show. She matured but she was still the same Sam underneath. Daniella's return as Sam was a regression; everything she had learned in Spain and during her previous time in Albert Square had been completely forgotten. It's as though the Kim Medcalf era hadn't happened and, yes, it was slightly insulting to Kim but the main insult was to the audience who had to accept that Sam went away with emotional maturity and somehow returned with the mentality of a lovesick, desperate teenager.”

Exactly my thoughts.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map