|
||||||||
EE - Is anyone else thinking Ronnie might lose the baby again? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,828
|
EE - Is anyone else thinking Ronnie might lose the baby again?
Kat and Cindy have both given birth to healthy babies. If Ronnie has a healthy baby too, that means there will be four babies on the square, which sounds like too many to me.
I am hoping DTC doesn't kill off her next baby as well. I am DONE with the show if this happens. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 125,435
|
If she does, maybe she comes back having had a miscarriage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
|
If they do that then it's game over.
Ronnie didn't need to get pregnant in the first place, this is what made the character go bat crazy in the first place all the fixation on babies, this one needs to live otherwise they might aswell say buh bye to her already. nobody really wants to see tragic heroine/weepy tortured Ronnie every 5 minutes she already got enough of that left to last a life time. The babies are merely a plot device it does seem DTC on a crusade to get as many women preggers as possible, why who knows other then creating future characters, I don't think babies add anything to the characters tbh, it does seem excessive but likely hood is we won't see them much anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Surely they couldn't be that cruel to her. I know they've got this whole 'tragic heroine' thing going on and everybody in soap has to suffer but to kill of yet another child (either before or after birth) would just be too much. If they do insist on heaping more misry on her, I think a more interesting approach would be that she finally gets her baby but can't bond with it (perhaps because she is scared of losing them again) so is still unable to be happy even though she's got what she wanted.
Re there being too many babies, they forget they exist most of the time anyway so I don't really think it is a problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 493
|
Please god no. Thats just too harsh on the character, theres only so much they can put her through, surely?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,547
|
I hope not, I really don't care what Ronnie haters say - "She Kidnapped A Baby! She Doesn't Deserve Happiness LMFAO!X"
She's a FICTIONAL character, and as a viewer in my point of view she's learned her lesson, she's DONE her time (excluding about 10 months ) and she actually does deserve some happiness - she even got rid of Carl White for us!
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 460
|
I really hope not :|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 125,435
|
From a storyline point of view, it may be interesting to see her come back having had an abortion but she tells people (well, Phil) she's had a miscarriage.
Just thinking aloud for plotlines that involve her not having the baby. I personally would like to see her and Charlie become a family and she has the baby. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 225
|
It would be ridiculous if they did that
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,362
|
I don't think the writers would be that stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,206
|
She should swap it again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,927
|
Quote:
Kat and Cindy have both given birth to healthy babies. If Ronnie has a healthy baby too, that means there will be four babies on the square, which sounds like too many to me.
I am hoping DTC doesn't kill off her next baby as well. I am DONE with the show if this happens. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: N. Ireland
Posts: 35
|
Maybe DTC wants to start up a creche
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,295
|
But if they kill the baby off, then her daughter and Ronnie's daunter won't be able to double-date with Bert and Ernie!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 533
|
This must not happen!!!
I want Ronnie to be happy!!!!!! SHE MUST BE HAPPY!!!!!!!! I'm sorry, I just love her too much to see her go through any more pain, it might just kill me... |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,800
|
If I was producer I wouldn't have given her a baby in the first place.
She is not mentally stable enough to be a mum, she's a kiddie snatcher and a murderder for hells sake, should be in prison. People who are saying why is Stacey allowed back, should look no further than Veronica Mitchell |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
|
I really hope not, thats just cruel writing if they make her loose a 3rd child - why make her pregnant in the first place if they are going to make her loose it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
That would be stupid, but then it wouldn't surprise me if it did happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,687
|
I really hope not. I'm sure DTC wouldn't do that to her again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,574
|
he does seem to be revisiting EE's greatest hits so it would not surprise me if she did jus to continue her on this dark path, however, I hope she does have the baby and give her other dramas instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 197
|
I'd like her to have a healthy baby and for her to bond with Dot seeing its her grandchild
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,180
|
No way on earth will anything ever happen to this baby. Sam quit because the tragedy became too much so she would never agree to playing out more of the same.
I know DTC said earlier in the year Ronnie was going to become Archie but judging from Inside Soap quotes and the things Ronnie said in her final episode about going away to ''fix'' herself, I think what we will see when Ronnie returns is the Ronnie we first had in 2007. The fun Ronnie that Sam said she wanted back in 2013. This baby will form part of her redemption for killing Carl. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 4,617
|
The death of another baby would be the death of Ronnie. She's already lost a child to many, and another would see the character ruined beyond redemption. I was looking forward to her becoming a dark new villain. Her developing as a mother isn't what I was expecting, but I'm looking forward to it, especially because she isn't tied down by Jack Branning anymore.
A child with Nick Cotton and Archie Mitchell in the family tree is explosive, and I'm sure we could be seeing the creation of a top EE villain in years to come. A Dot/ Nick relationship between Ronnie and her child could be very interesting (assuming the show and ronnie are both around in years to come!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,467
|
I doubt they'll go down that route again, I reckon they'll let her have a healthy baby but I have a feeling Nick Cotton will try kidnap Ronnie's baby and Ronnie will kill Nick Cotton to protect her baby on the 30th Anniversary like she did to Carl in January.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Digital Spy init.
Posts: 4,677
|
Quote:
I doubt they'll go down that route again, I reckon they'll let her have a healthy baby but I have a feeling Nick Cotton will try kidnap Ronnie's baby and Ronnie will kill Nick Cotton to protect her baby on the 30th Anniversary like she did to Carl in January.
Have Ronnie and Nick actually met? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:15.



) and she actually does deserve some happiness - she even got rid of Carl White for us! 