|
||||||||
Rainie Branning / Cross and Daniella Westbrooke |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,663
|
Rainie Branning / Cross and Daniella Westbrooke
So they are unwilling to give Daniella some work, perhaps due to her drug addiction, even writing or research for the drugs story, despite the fact she has family there.
However, they are prepared to give Rainie screentime, and are trying to push the drug addiction story as realistic as possible. That doesn't sit right with me. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,180
|
This makes no sense at all.
Rainie is a drug addict, not Tanya Franks. The actress doesn't have an issue with drugs. Sam Mitchell isn't a drug addict, but obviously Daniella has relapsed. That's completely different. And why should they bring Daniella back? Obviously she isn't in a great place, and maybe they don't want Sam back. I don't want people getting parts out of pity. Silly thread. They don't owe Daniella anything never mind employment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,981
|
Agreed with above, stupid thread.
Besides, Daniella Westbrooke was bloody awful the last time she was in EE. If Sam were to come back I would want the other actress. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 16,810
|
None of this makes any sense
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,663
|
Its just that with storylines they prattle on about raising awareness, saving lives, being realistic, like moral guardians. then the one person who they could help with councilling, part time work etc they basically ignore. seems like double standards. just my opinion though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,917
|
Quote:
Its just that with storylines they prattle on about raising awareness, saving lives, being realistic, like moral guardians. then the one person who they could help with councilling, part time work etc they basically ignore. seems like double standards. just my opinion though.
![]() Oh and if you knew how to spell Danniella's first or second name correctly it may convince more people you cared what she was going through right now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,547
|
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 317
|
I don't agree with your idea that a drug addict deserves a high profile and well paid job simply because they have relapsed. Whether or not the Eastenders team are in support of drug rehabilitation it would be completely irresponsible of them to take it into their own hands, especially in the public eye.
It's not Eastenders' job to save the world, though I imagine what they are doing is beneficial to all drug addicts. Daniella Westbrook is not more important than the millions of other drug addicts in the country. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,113
|
this really is a stupid thread
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,101
|
Tanya Franks is an excellent actress. Ms Westbrook is not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 17,148
|
Quote:
Its just that with storylines they prattle on about raising awareness, saving lives, being realistic, like moral guardians. then the one person who they could help with councilling, part time work etc they basically ignore. seems like double standards. just my opinion though.
It's not up to them to go giving jobs out for pity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
|
Quote:
Tanya Franks is an excellent actress. Ms Westbrook is not.
(imo)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,180
|
as others have pointed out. very silly topic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The Sixth Circle of Hell
Posts: 20,237
|
Quote:
Tanya Franks is an excellent actress. Ms Westbrook is not.
Tanya is superb and I would argue that Westbrook was never an actress full stop!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:28.




(imo)