Originally Posted by chrisy:
“I'd have expected them to add that at the same time if they were going to.
But why break it up into two separate changes before the "big one". Why not do it all on the same day? Adding POP+1 on 76 when it is going to move in two days and most likely before it starts broadcasting is just weird. Why not hold out for two days and do the mux move combined with the new LCN? TBA on 136 - why add it a week before the changes on the new LCN, when they clearly can't even use the real name?
There's not a single change there (and last week) that couldn't have waited until the 3rd.”
I agree. Given that channel numbers can be allocated but not activated for a while (eg TBN), they did not need to add the services until tomorrow morning. (eg stage 1, 11:00 activate placeholders for new channels on 69, 90, 126 and 136, stage 2 at 1:00, change news and children's channel numbers. Where capacity is available, start activating the new services shortly thereafter.)
And a timeshift having greater coverage than its main channel is difficult to explain to audiences.
But it is interesting to see how the last two waves of changes have occured in the afternoon, rather than the 10:45-11:45 timeframe that has previously been used. Is this an indication of when the hopefully final set of changes are made?
Also to note is that COM6/ArqB was configured to have enough null packets to allow two services to launch shortly after BBC RB302 was closed, before the null packets were reduced. Therefore I think we should expect a new stream to activate there shortly.