|
||||||||
UK Compilation Chart |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 210
|
UK Compilation Chart
I reckon the OCC should abolish the compilation chart and allow compilations to chart in the UK Albums Chart.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England, West Yorkshire
Posts: 154
|
I think they should just include compilations in the normal chart as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,517
|
Quote:
I reckon the OCC should abolish the compilation chart and allow compilations to chart in the UK Albums Chart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
And we'd have a NOW CD at #1 for pretty much every single week of the year. That would be fantastic wouldn't it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 303
|
The UK Charts Company decided to exclude Multi Artist Compilations & Film Soundtracks
from the Album Chart from W/E 14th January 1989 onwards. And the Compilation Chart was created to put Multi Artist Albums & Film Soundtracks in. There is no way that, that decision will ever be reversed. The reasons why it was made were because when the 'Now' Albums first started in late 1983, they were forever taking over the No.1 spot. As were Albums in the 'Hits' series. It got really boring to see Compilations at No.1 all the time. It also stopped proper Artists from being No.1 as often as they could have been. For example, in 1985 the 'Like A Virgin' Album by Madonna would have been No.1 for 7 Weeks. It only had 2 Weeks at No.1 due to 'Now' Albums holding it at No.2. And if we allowed 'Now' etc. Albums back into the main Album Chart they would forever go to No.1 all over again. This is obvious, as there are many Weeks when the No.1 Album in the Compilation Chart outsells the No.1 Album in the main - 'Artist' - Album Chart. (There is no chance on Earth that the Chart Company will ever add the Compilation Chart to the Artist Chart again. It will never happen. And I - and many other people - are glad that it will never happen). Thanks to Film Soundtracks being allowed into the main Album Chart, in the 1950's & 1960's, the UK's Top 3 Albums - based on Weeks at No.1 - are all from that period - and all 3 are Film Soundtracks. 1) SOUTH PACIFIC (SOUNDTRACK) - (1958) - 115 Weeks at No.1 (Over 2 Years at No.1! Including all of 1959) 2) THE SOUND OF MUSIC (SOUNDTRACK) - (1965) - 70 Weeks At No.1 3) THE KING & I (SOUNDTRACK) - (1956) - 48 Weeks At No.1 The nearest Artist Album is 'Bridge Over Troubled Water' by Simon & Garfunkel. (1970). That was No.1 for 33 Weeks from 1970 to 1971. But - as you can see - it is no-where near the Top 3 Albums with the most No.1 Weeks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 461
|
The Now! CD's are the biggest selling albums of the year. They'd be number one all the time. It would be so incredibly boring if that was reversed.
Silly idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,517
|
Quote:
But at least it wouldn't be six months at number 1 like Adele's album or two months at number 1 like Ed Sheeran's album
I love your logic, it's really inspired |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
So instead of Adele's album being number 1 for 'six months' (it wasn't number 1 for anywhere near that long but we'll go with what you say for the sake of argument) you'd rather have a Now CD number 1 for the majority of the year?
I love your logic, it's really inspired |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
|
I agree, they should be added to the main chart
They are in the US |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,657
|
I think it's an awful idea. As already posted, the NOW! albums are usually the best sellers of the week so the chart would very rarely change, until the new edition of NOW! comes out of course
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
I think it's an awful idea. As already posted, the NOW! albums are usually the best sellers of the week so the chart would very rarely change, until the new edition of NOW! comes out of course
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,517
|
Quote:
Not necessarily. In 2011, sales of Adele's album were strong enough to keep NOW 78 off number 1 or maybe, NOW 78 would have only managed a week at number 1 if the compilation chart wasn't created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,124
|
I don't think the record labels would like it either. Much fewer artists would be able to get #1, which would make them more difficult to market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
Ok, so Adele is the only exception in recent years to the Now CD domination. But unless we have another album reaching the success of Adele's 21, 'Now' will still dominate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 461
|
Quote:
Not just Adele. In 2010, sales of Take That's complete reunion album Progress were strong enough to keep NOW 77 off number 1.
It will destroy albums. Numerous dates throughout the year will be blacklisted to release an album and nobody is going to want to release an album within 2-3 weeks of a Now album being released. Also Mothers Day, Easter, etc when special compilations are released will see the same old album hitting the top spot. Same thing with Now Christmas which gets a huge amounts of sales every year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 210
|
It's not just numbered NOW albums. They also release spin offs as well just before the numbered release but some of the spin offs seem to fail in the chart
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
So you get a couple albums per year beating the compilations to the top? What is the point, that is exactly why a compilation chart was created. Compilations are full of singles which have had their chance to chart on the Singles Chart, why should they dominate the albums chart too.
It will destroy albums. Numerous dates throughout the year will be blacklisted to release an album and nobody is going to want to release an album within 2-3 weeks of a Now album being released. Also Mothers Day, Easter, etc when special compilations are released will see the same old album hitting the top spot. Same thing with Now Christmas which gets a huge amounts of sales every year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 461
|
Quote:
17th November, NOW 89 and One Direction's fourth album are both being released. If compilations still charted in the album chart, One Direction's album might beat NOW 89 to number 1.
One Direction's last album managed 237,000 first week sales (during the highest selling period of the year) compared with Now 86 selling 270,000 copies in first week. It's pretty much impossible for anyone who isn't at global level like 1D/Adele etc to get a number one if compilations were reintroduced. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
Still quite unlikely unlikely. Now 88 (which was released at the slump period of the year) managed 225,000 copies sold in its first week. The most a studio album has achieved so far this year in its first week is Ed Sheeran with about 130,000.
One Direction's last album managed 237,000 first week sales (during the highest selling period of the year) compared with Now 86 selling 270,000 copies in first week. It's pretty much impossible for anyone who isn't at global level like 1D/Adele etc to get a number one if compilations were reintroduced. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:49.

