DS Forums

 
 

EE: Do you think they'll let Ronnie keep her baby?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-09-2014, 22:23
Noush
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,504

.....Do you think they'll let Ronnie keep her baby or do you think TPTB will make her lose it again? I remember an interview with an EE producer who said if they gave Ronnie any happiness her character would be ruined.....

How would you feel if they didn't let Ronnie have her baby? Personally I'm finding her life such a drain that I whimper when she suddenly appears on screen! I really hope they let her have it and keep it etc....
Noush is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 08-09-2014, 22:24
Firegazer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Downtown
Posts: 5,810
.....Do you think they'll let Ronnie keep her baby or do you think TPTB will make her lose it again? I remember an interview with an EE producer who said if they gave Ronnie any happiness her character would be ruined.....

How would you feel if they didn't let Ronnie have her baby? Personally I'm finding her life such a drain that I whimper when she suddenly appears on screen! I really hope they let her have it and keep it etc....
She has a constant look of sadness on her face - but then again, so would I after all she's been through!
Firegazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 22:26
Kim_x
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
If it's true that Sam Womack was going to quit if she had to play out more depressing Ronnie, then yeah.

Also, I think it being a mutual grandchild of Archie Mitchell and Nick Cotton is enough to save it.

I personally don't think she should have a baby, but there we go.
Kim_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 22:27
Harlowe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
I think there would be a uproar if something happens to this baby, most fans didn't want her pregnant again but if they've just done it to cause further grief then she might as well be gone cause it shit.

But that being said the baby might not necessarily bring her happiness she just thinks it will.

Add to that we have no clue what Charlie's ulterior motives might be, he didn't seem keen in the trailer but if she is found unfit to be a mother she could loose her child in another way.
Harlowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 22:28
Fergie86
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4,919
She has a constant look of sadness on her face - but then again, so would I after all she's been through!
Exactly, this is why she should keep the baby and have a happy ending, she has been through enough, plus how many more ways can she lose a baby. if they want to pile on the misery as it is EastEnders let her get Post Natal Depression and see her struggle with Motherhood originally after yearning for it for so long, before eventually overcoming it and becoming a brilliant Mother who loves her Child.
Fergie86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 22:29
Chris Mark
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Digital Spy init.
Posts: 4,677
If anything happens to that baby or Ronnie I will turn into Annie Wilkes.
Chris Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 22:31
Noush
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,504
Yes, I agree.....enough with the sadness! By rights a lot of people would have ended their lives after all she went through but she carried on. They should show how there is light at the end of the tunnel if you stay strong.
Noush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 04:25
Noush
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,504
In the trailer for September, she looks quite big, eg so quite far gone.....it would be so out of order if they killed the baby off
Noush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 05:07
Leon Bilson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,025
They should not have made her pregnant yet again. Can they not find a storyline not focused on babies? Knowing EastEnders, Charlie will probably run off with the tot, bringing Ronnie to “Four Ways to Lose a Child”.

Talking of her, what happened to Carl White's mum and brother? She confessed that she had killed him, but then what? Surely they didn't just accept this and never bother her again?
Leon Bilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 05:29
Noush
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,504
They should not have made her pregnant yet again. Can they not find a storyline not focused on babies? Knowing EastEnders, Charlie will probably run off with the tot, bringing Ronnie to “Four Ways to Lose a Child”.

Talking of her, what happened to Carl White's mum and brother? She confessed that she had killed him, but then what? Surely they didn't just accept this and never bother her again?
Didn't Phil sort the mother and brother out??? Can't remember either...

I think Nick Cotton is more likely to kidnap the baby and hold it to ransom......maybe this is where the gunshot comes in??? 🔫
Noush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 06:01
Kim_x
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
Didn't Phil sort the mother and brother out??? Can't remember either...

I think Nick Cotton is more likely to kidnap the baby and hold it to ransom......maybe this is where the gunshot comes in??? 🔫
Aleks put the brother in hospital didn't he?
Kim_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 06:53
Scrabbler
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
They will not kill off a descendant of Dots again, killing Ashley put them in a hole.
Scrabbler is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 07:16
x-Angel-Wings-x
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 125
I want Ronnie back nowwww with baby. Smiley, happy Ronnie lol yeah, right.
x-Angel-Wings-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 07:35
Ell_Ren
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
This is going to sound bad but I don't think they should have made Ronnie pregnant yet. I want her to have her happy ever after like everyone else but, I don't see it working having her tied down to a baby. (I know that sounds bad, but you can see where I am coming from?)
Ell_Ren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 07:42
mintchocchip
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,556
I would hate it if they killed the baby! Give her just one thing to smile about please DTC!
mintchocchip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 09:30
Chloe_Beads
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 192
Its stupid timing any way ... Just as kats had her babies they cant have Ronnie lose another one as Kat walks round with hers again but, equally alfie and Kat haven't had an easy ride where pregnancies and kids are concerned so to have one of the children harmed in the fire would be stupid to... With the timing I don't see how anything can happen to Ronnie or baby or Kat or babies with out it been very contrived .. I do think we will have a shock death in the fire of alfie .... Going off topic I know but with Lucy ... A shock fire death and the shooting along with a rape can east enders really cram any more sorrow in before Christmas involving kids again??
Chloe_Beads is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 11:36
Mattehhhftw
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,687
I just don't see what would be gained if she got pregnant and lost the child AGAIN. I'd (as I'm sure other fans) would be very angry if she lost the baby. I just can't see DTC putting her through that again
Mattehhhftw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 13:13
Chris Mark
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Digital Spy init.
Posts: 4,677
Genghis Cotton Mitchell will be able to use a samurai sword by the time he/she is able to walk. A baby with Mitchell and Cotton genes will make Ben, Nick and Ronnie herself look sane.


With Archie Mitchell and Nick Cotton as grandparents this one will be a force to be reckoned with.
Chris Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 13:35
The_abbott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,574
I think the baby will be born but there will be complications and then the battle with Charlie/Nick about the baby as ronnie wouldn't want Nick hanging around it. So the can keep giving Ronnie miserable storylines but at least she has something to live for now. You always kind of felt that Ronnie should have topped herself as she has nothing left in her life. At least she has that now.
The_abbott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 13:38
The Queen Vic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,916
Yes.

Treadwell-Collins created the Mitchell sisters and he cares a great deal with them. Also, one of the reasons why Sam Womack left was because she felt Ronnie had been given too much misery, and she was sick of crying every day. I know she's being turned into a villain of sorts, but having her lose another baby would send the woman over the edge and also, it'd be almost like rehashing history.

I personally don't want to see that again. I like Ronnie. I want her to be happy. I know she's done some terrible things and inevitably she will pay for those actions (people in soaps always do) but don't let her lose her baby. It'd also give Charlie a lot to do beyond the Nick storyline - I imagine he will be sticking around.
The Queen Vic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 13:40
Hit Em Up Style
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cell Block H
Posts: 11,878
No it will be born perfectly healthy around Christmas.

Ronnie will get the happy storyline of the festive period while the Carters and the Beales all have heartache.
Hit Em Up Style is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 13:56
Chris Mark
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Digital Spy init.
Posts: 4,677
No it will be born perfectly healthy around Christmas.

Ronnie will get the happy storyline of the festive period while the Carters and the Beales all have heartache.
Happiness for Ronnie.

Does that mean the sun will rise in the west tomorrow? Or that snow will fall in the Amazon rainforest?
Chris Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 13:59
SecretLifeoBees
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dorothy Fish Common Room
Posts: 31,209
Trish Barnes will rock up and declare Ronnie unfit to be a mother because of her past.
SecretLifeoBees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 21:17
Noush
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,504
No it will be born perfectly healthy around Christmas.

Ronnie will get the happy storyline of the festive period while the Carters and the Beales all have heartache.
I really would love to see a happy Ronnie - for once....
Noush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 23:16
Hav_mor91
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The rolling Green of Wales.
Posts: 16,031
I think they sort of have to if that makes sense.

When Danielle and Jack were bumped off it caused uproar and controversy with many fans feeling short changed. Plus it's unrealistic and rehashing her past.

Agreed they need to do something interesting with her but please please let her have a healthy and happy baby.
Hav_mor91 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28.