In last night's highlights, after the HMs saw Audley's nomination for Dee, Dee very rudely said "There's a difference between votin' tactically and sticking your head up someone's arse".
Audley said the nomination was tactical (what does he think it means?) and had a valid reason. Dee said it wasn't tactical and that the reason wasn't valid because she saw it as saying she was out of order and Gary wasn't (failing to understand the reason he'd actually given).
Then she said "I don't mind the tactical playing, but the game-players...."
So far it's clear: she thinks tactical is ok, game-playing isn't, and thinks Audley wasn't being tactical.
Next, a bit later, after George said something about eyes on the prize Audley, and Audley said "I have my eyes on the prize", Dee gave another of her smug, smirking nods and said "You definitely have got your eyes on the prize".
The insinuation seemed to be that Audley was doing things with the aim of winning the show. But wouldn't that be tactical, as "tactical" would normally be understood?

Then they see another of Audley's nominations, saying "I don't know if he's earned his stripes". Dee says she'd put money on it being George. James says Audley went for the two he knew weren't gonna go up, because it gives him better odds to stay in to the final. (Which makes little sense, really, but would obviously be tactical.)
That led to Audley asking Dee why she'd said he wasn't being tactical. She claimed his reason for nominating her wasn't tactical.
But that still leaves the problem of fitting the "eye on the prize" insinuation as a criticism even though she though being tactical was ok.
So still
Audley said the nomination was tactical (what does he think it means?) and had a valid reason. Dee said it wasn't tactical and that the reason wasn't valid because she saw it as saying she was out of order and Gary wasn't (failing to understand the reason he'd actually given).
Then she said "I don't mind the tactical playing, but the game-players...."
So far it's clear: she thinks tactical is ok, game-playing isn't, and thinks Audley wasn't being tactical.
Next, a bit later, after George said something about eyes on the prize Audley, and Audley said "I have my eyes on the prize", Dee gave another of her smug, smirking nods and said "You definitely have got your eyes on the prize".
The insinuation seemed to be that Audley was doing things with the aim of winning the show. But wouldn't that be tactical, as "tactical" would normally be understood?

Then they see another of Audley's nominations, saying "I don't know if he's earned his stripes". Dee says she'd put money on it being George. James says Audley went for the two he knew weren't gonna go up, because it gives him better odds to stay in to the final. (Which makes little sense, really, but would obviously be tactical.)
That led to Audley asking Dee why she'd said he wasn't being tactical. She claimed his reason for nominating her wasn't tactical.
But that still leaves the problem of fitting the "eye on the prize" insinuation as a criticism even though she though being tactical was ok.
So still
It was totally combobulating as Gary would say. Dee is an idiot, hypocrite and liar of the highest order. You say you're still confused .... the answer is SHES A DICK!