• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
My problem with X Factor 2014...
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
d56
23-09-2014
Originally Posted by Julie_Evans:
“BIB - Excellent point.

The minute Simon changed the panel from 3 to 4, it became about the judges more than the acts, I've always thought that. Simon wanted to stir things up, and it changed from then on.”

So it wasn't about the judges when Sharon threw water in Louis' face on live national television or when Simon and Sharon kissed after Leona's performance or when Louis quit because of his treatment in series 2?

And when it became to four it was Sharon walking off set because two of her acts were in the bottom 2 at the end of the day...
Julie_Evans
24-09-2014
Originally Posted by d56:
“So it wasn't about the judges when Sharon threw water in Louis' face on live national television or when Simon and Sharon kissed after Leona's performance or when Louis quit because of his treatment in series 2?

And when it became to four it was Sharon walking off set because two of her acts were in the bottom 2 at the end of the day...”



You're very excitable

You've just named one of the X Factor's most memorable moments D (is it D for Dannii?) Well done

Of course you miss the point that myself and Hitstastic make - about it being more about the glitz and the glamour than the contestants.

Bringing Dannii and then Cheryl to the show changed all that - there is too much emphasis on the judges now, particularly the female judges.
d56
24-09-2014
Originally Posted by Julie_Evans:
“You're very excitable

You've just named one of the X Factor's most memorable moments D (is it D for Dannii?) Well done

Of course you miss the point that myself and Hitstastic make - about it being more about the glitz and the glamour than the contestants.

Bringing Dannii and then Cheryl to the show changed all that - there is too much emphasis on the judges now, particularly the female judges.”

There was always emphasis on the female judge. Sharon was seen as the "boss" during the early years.

The reason the press started to focus more on the female judges was two reasons.
Number one was the absolute EMBARRASSMENT Sharon Osbourne made of herself by slagging Dannii off for years and walking off set and being a total drama queen diva. Because of this, the press became obsessed with the female judges not getting along, no matter who they were. And the second reason is because people created a 'style war' where Dannii & Cheryl's outfits were compared because they were young and pretty and actually wore fashionable stuff rather than the same old like Sharon did.
noelw1969
24-09-2014
My problem (or problems) with X Factor 2014 are that Cowell and Cole are back on the show, officially taking it backwards and that Cowell has had a secondary "brain fart" resulting in Mel B being brought in to join them.

I have not watched a single second of this show but my reading tells me that Cowell is effectively now turning this into a game show meaning that the idea of hunting down this countrys' talent is now officially out of the window.
DavetheSensible
24-09-2014
Is it me or is this season far more cluttered than usual? Admittedly I normally watch on fast forward these days, generally only watching the performances, but I just get the impression there's far more artists wheeled on - many only for parts of songs. Which is irritating as if the artists are good I want to hear them, if they're mmmm might be interesting, ditto, and even if they're not good or even bad there's some pleasure in watching the car crash.

So that's my 'My problem with ...'. It's getting very messy and unfocussed, almost as if they don't care at all any more.
jerefprdterra
24-09-2014
I would rather see Alesha Dixon the the panel than Cowell.
puppetangel
24-09-2014
I'm way more interested in seeing more of Mel. I can't deal with Cheryls eye rolling and attitude with Simon. She's very beautiful to look at but I dont like the attitude especially as she pre-records and has autotune when singing.

And I'd rather see more acts than huge segments just on one act. And I'm I bored of the show. I'd rather see Pop Idol back.
grimtales1
24-09-2014
Originally Posted by Hitstastic:
“The only way they could make X Factor work again is by going back to basics. Strip it all back to circa 2006.

There were no backstage "conversations", there were no "profiles" of the auditionees before they've even sang a note. By having these profiles, their basically showing you in advance who has made it through to judges houses - maybe even the live shows, I've hardly been watching it this year.

They need to scrap the live auditions as that doesn't work. The acoustics in a small room and a large stadium are so different. In a small room, a bum note stands out like a sore thumb. In a stadium, with 50k people in the crowd cheering, masks any bum notes that are performed. If you're in the stadium with people screaming all around you, someone could sing slightly off key and everyone will think "wow, they sound good" but then you watch it back on a TV set with very different acoustics and those bum notes and off key vocals really start to stand out.

Then again, X Factor is no longer a singing competition. It was in the early years before they started introducing the novelty acts like Jedward and Wagner.

I think the reasons for the decreasing viewing figures has been summed up in this thread. It's all about the glitz and the glamour and no emphasis at all on the contestants. They're basically there to play a role that the producers have decided to align them with. Even if they're nothing like that in real life, they're moulded into a character.

As for The Voice, I don't think that's hindered the success of X Factor because The Voice itself has failed to generate any success. Hence why none of the winners have actually done well and the closest thing to a success story there, is Becky Hill who was eliminated before we got to the final.”

Great post, and lots of it I agree with. I've gradually lost interest over the years as I can see blatant manipulation and the fact its more about the judges than the acts. I havent even bothered watching so far this year.
Julie_Evans
24-09-2014
Originally Posted by d56:
“There was always emphasis on the female judge. Sharon was seen as the "boss" during the early years.

The reason the press started to focus more on the female judges was two reasons.
Number one was the absolute EMBARRASSMENT Sharon Osbourne made of herself by slagging Dannii off for years and walking off set and being a total drama queen diva. Because of this, the press became obsessed with the female judges not getting along, no matter who they were. And the second reason is because people created a 'style war' where Dannii & Cheryl's outfits were compared because they were young and pretty and actually wore fashionable stuff rather than the same old like Sharon did.”



BIB - I stopped reading after that bit. You're Dannii crazy
Julie_Evans
24-09-2014
Originally Posted by grimtales1:
“Great post, and lots of it I agree with. I've gradually lost interest over the years as I can see blatant manipulation and the fact its more about the judges than the acts. I havent even bothered watching so far this year.”


That is the fundamental reason the show changed, that's why there are so many threads on here devoted to either hero worshipping or slagging off of whoever is on the X Factor panel.

And it's always the female judges who get the emphasis not the men, you hardly see threads created to slag off Louis, Simon or Barlow, even though there is plenty to criticise them on - and that is entirely Cowell's fault, it's headlines for him, that's all he cares about.
Rangermick
24-09-2014
You two need to get a room!
Hitstastic
24-09-2014
Originally Posted by Rangermick:
“You two need to get a room!”

They did. It was a catastrophe. That's why they're so bitter with each other.

Only joking!!!
d56
24-09-2014
Originally Posted by Julie_Evans:
“BIB - I stopped reading after that bit. You're Dannii crazy ”

How embarrassing. I'm not "Dannii crazy" at all. She was my favourite judge. As was Nicole during her spell. You started to talk about how the emphasis was on the female judges when Dannii joined, and I pointed out how it was hardly her creating the headlines when it was Sharon walking off set, slagging her off and quitting.

Seriously, if you can't debate a point proper, don't bother replying
d56
24-09-2014
Originally Posted by Julie_Evans:
“That is the fundamental reason the show changed, that's why there are so many threads on here devoted to either hero worshipping or slagging off of whoever is on the X Factor panel.

And it's always the female judges who get the emphasis not the men, you hardly see threads created to slag off Louis, Simon or Barlow, even though there is plenty to criticise them on - and that is entirely Cowell's fault, it's headlines for him, that's all he cares about.”

Disagree. The reason headlines were created about female judges not getting on is because Sharon started to act like an utter mess when a younger, prettier female judge joined the show.

You can use how Dannii and Simon had a relationship/were sleeping together as the reason Sharon got so upset, but Sharon herself even admitted on her US show The Talk when the stories came out in 2012 that their relationship didn't bother her.

The truth is the second Dannii came on the show, it was someone to take the limelight off Sharon and she didn't like it. The fact that Dannii was criticised for not having a successful enough career that series to warrant a place on the panel, yet ended up winning with the final two acts her boys just rubbed salt in the wound for Mrs O and that's why she left.

Cowell stirred the pot and probably loved every minute of it, but it's not entirely his fault when Sharon was acting the bitter old witch in 2007 (and many years after it I might add)
Julie_Evans
24-09-2014
Originally Posted by d56:
“How embarrassing. I'm not "Dannii crazy" at all. She was my favourite judge. As was Nicole during her spell. You started to talk about how the emphasis was on the female judges when Dannii joined, and I pointed out how it was hardly her creating the headlines when it was Sharon walking off set, slagging her off and quitting.

Seriously, if you can't debate a point proper, don't bother replying ”


Yes you are

I'm very bored

Goodnight

PS - You need to accept that not all of us love Dannii as much as you do. Sharon seriously disliked her, and I completely understand why
d56
25-09-2014
Originally Posted by Julie_Evans:
“Yes you are

I'm very bored

Goodnight

PS - You need to accept that not all of us love Dannii as much as you do. Sharon seriously disliked her, and I completely understand why ”

Is that all you can come back with? Wow.
You can't debate the point because you know I'm right. Liking someone doesn't mean you're "mad on them" - I just much prefer Dannii to Sharon. I think most of Digital Spy and the public do too. I mean, it's like me saying you're "mad on Sharon", it's just embarrassing. Seriously, come back to me when you learn to be debate a point.
Master Ozzy
25-09-2014
Credibility doesn't work for this show. Persoanlly, I think the best two judges ever were Kelly Rowland and Nicole. Kelly knew what she walking talking about though and she knew her stuff...I think she realised how manipulated and fake the show was a bit taken aback. I don't think Kelly would have come back. Nicole knew what she was talking about too and really, Simon should have made sure she was back this year. Danni was very good too. I can't for the life of me understand this big obsession with having Cheryl on the Panel. She did very well with Alexandra, but apart from that I don't think she's been very good as a judge. I think Joe would always have done well in the show regardless as it wasn't exactly a year full of talent during that series.
Julie_Evans
25-09-2014
Originally Posted by d56:
“Is that all you can come back with? Wow.
You can't debate the point because you know I'm right. Liking someone doesn't mean you're "mad on them" - I just much prefer Dannii to Sharon. I think most of Digital Spy and the public do too. I mean, it's like me saying you're "mad on Sharon", it's just embarrassing. Seriously, come back to me when you learn to be debate a point.”



BIB - Couldn't be further from the truth D.

LOL at you lecturing me on how to debate a point
cooler
25-09-2014
Originally Posted by Hitstastic:
“They need to scrap the live auditions as that doesn't work. The acoustics in a small room and a large stadium are so different. In a small room, a bum note stands out like a sore thumb. In a stadium, with 50k people in the crowd cheering, masks any bum notes that are performed. If you're in the stadium with people screaming all around you, someone could sing slightly off key and everyone will think "wow, they sound good" but then you watch it back on a TV set with very different acoustics and those bum notes and off key vocals really start to stand out.”

They've already scrapped live auditions?
d56
25-09-2014
Originally Posted by Julie_Evans:
“BIB - Couldn't be further from the truth D.

LOL at you lecturing me on how to debate a point ”

I know LOL at me. It's true though, look at the points I made yet your reply was "I'm bored". Talk about admitting defeat

Oh and by the way, when you highlight a quote in bold, people usually know that's what you're talking about, kind of get tired of seeing BIB from you
Julie_Evans
25-09-2014
Originally Posted by d56:
“I know LOL at me. It's true though, look at the points I made yet your reply was "I'm bored". Talk about admitting defeat

Oh and by the way, when you highlight a quote in bold, people usually know that's what you're talking about, kind of get tired of seeing BIB from you ”



BIB (See what I did?) - I'll make sure I'll do it all the more then, just to annoy you sweetie

Oh, there's the ignore button if I rattle your little cage that much - D for Dannii
d56
25-09-2014
Originally Posted by Julie_Evans:
“BIB (See what I did?) - I'll make sure I'll do it all the more then, just to annoy you sweetie

Oh, there's the ignore button if I rattle your little cage that much - D for Dannii ”

You don't "rattle my cage" - you're actually funny. It's always funny seeing someone unable to reply or back their own comment up and having to resort to childish behaviour. Maybe that's why you love Sharon Osbourne so much. Unless you are her?

Next thing I know, I'll be getting sh*t in a box sent to my door...
Julie_Evans
26-09-2014
Originally Posted by d56:
“You don't "rattle my cage" - you're actually funny. It's always funny seeing someone unable to reply or back their own comment up and having to resort to childish behaviour. Maybe that's why you love Sharon Osbourne so much. Unless you are her?

Next thing I know, I'll be getting sh*t in a box sent to my door...”



PM me your address and I'll be delighted to oblige

Seriously D for Dannii, you're making a fool of yourself now
d56
26-09-2014
Originally Posted by Julie_Evans:
“PM me your address and I'll be delighted to oblige

Seriously D for Dannii, you're making a fool of yourself now ”

I'm the one making a fool of myself when you're the one who resorted to being childish and petty because you couldn't debate the points I had made? Ok then....
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map