Originally Posted by
missfrankiecat:
“I think they would have to be prepared to slog it in less glamorous venues and towns (where there is less competition for market). The only two really successful Strictly pros who have toured on their own repeatedly are Anton & Erin and Flavia & Vincent (I don't think Brendan still does, does he?) and they both have very clear products to sell. Anton and Erin tapped into the old-fashioned variety show with dancing for all the family years ago, and have built up a very clear image that can now sell out huge venues like the Royal Albert Hall (Anton's detractors on DS never seem to get how calculated and successful his 'brand' is). Flavia and Vincent have also worked hard to build on their AT expertise as shook for a show with broad contemporary appeal which can attract good (and repeat) audiences. I'm not sure I want to think what James' USP would be!
”
Which is where they are reaping the benefits of actually being on Strictly. For a profession with a short shelf life (for want of a better way of putting it) and limited chances for recognition outside of the dance world, they've probably doubled the length of their career and more than doubled their earning potential. The name recognition that comes from being on the show must be worth its weight in gold.
(Similar, but different

, was watching the World Road Race cycling championships at the weekend where one of the commentators was Rob Hayles - Team GB medal winning cyclist, world champion in a number of events, with a long, distinguished career and he was talking with some glumness at the wages of pro cyclist now as compared to when he was under contract

Just because you are a world champion and well known in your own field doesn't mean the money automatically follows. It needs something to get the participants into being a household name and for dancing that something seems to have been Strictly).