Originally Posted by Fuchsia Groan:
“Who was to say which out of Dave & Mark would be the duffest duffer, though? Or any of the other duffers who fetch up from year to year?
OK, in the case of Dave & Mark, if you had to do so in advance, you'd pick Mark as the better of the two because of his performance skills. But who, for instance, would you have chosen as duffer in chief in John Sergeant's year? Quite possibly John himself.
My point is that the perceived dufferness of individual celebs means nothing until their pros get to deal with them and, of course, how the celebs are able to project themselves to the viewers.
I have absolutely no axe to grind with Aliona, but do not feel that she's been dealt with any less fairly than any other pro.
I do think, however, that she's not as good at being an SCD pro as some of her peers.”
Dave because Mark could dance. He wasn't the best, he had major limitations but the only comparisons I see between them is they're both fat and both funny. To me, the duffer is always the one who we know has little to no dancing ability but camps it up with performance and stunts. Dave was entertainingly bad and he left just as the joke was wearing thin so it was the right time.
Tony was not a duffer but he was always likely to be the first to go last year and it was the same case with Johnny. Tony is a golfer which has no relation to dancing and is a sport with a very select fan base, usually, although not always, older. What's more he is a retired golfer so not even in the public eye in his chosen field for a long time, older (how many over 55's have we seen get to the latter stages of the show) and was never going to be the joker of the pack like Dave. He was a sitting duck, sadly, because I liked Tony and would have liked to have seen him go further.
Gregg was actually someone I thought might go further but Aliona was given a very divisive character due to the recent revelations regarding his personal life and the mere fact that he is a marmite personality. As soon as they were in the dance-off, I thought that would be it no matter what they did. I also thought that although Jennifer shouldn't have been there, Gregg should have survived as he at least attempted to correct the areas where the judges stated he went wrong even though his dance still wasn't great. Jennifer made exactly the same mistakes she made first time around.
As I said in another thread:
To go out in the first round once is unfortunate.
To go out in the first round twice is suspicious.
To go out in the first round three times is a vendetta.