• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 62)
<<
<
104 of 792
>>
>
yorkie100
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“Looking on Twitter, the only people watching Waterloo Road are kids who think the new pupils are 'fit'

Can't believe they've got a new head, lots of new staff and lots of new students yet again, this show has had about 3 reboots too many. They've also fallen into the trap that they always do of not getting the balance between new and old characters right, meaning it's like a completely new show every year.

The main storyline seems to be around pictures of a teacher sat on the toilet being posted around the school, like a storyline from Grange hill during its less gritty pre-teen CBBC era.”

They must pay good money because they do get some decent actors on it - just a shame there appears to be no money left over for scriptwriters.
NeilVW
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“I liked Murphy's Law, but I think that's the highest-rated show he's ever topped the bill in. I think this series will struggle in the ratings.”

Further to cylon6's answer, Cold Feet went higher. Its later series fairly often went over 9m officially and the finale in March 2003 scored 10.72m. Best I can find for Murphy's Law is 7.48m for the pilot in September 2001.
cylon6
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by hyperstarsponge:
“Waterloo Road is more for the CBeebies channel these days.”

An insult to Cbeebies!
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“Big School has more drama and is more realistic than Waterloo Road. ”

Waterloo Road is poor drama in primetime. Who watches it in big numbers apart from kids? Limited cross-generational appeal. That's why it has low ratings.
Jaycee Dove
15-10-2014
As I have said many times about Our Zoo it will likely depend on if it sells well abroad or if TV everywhere has lost interest in feel good well acted, well scripted shows that do not feature guns, sex, car chases or aliens.
Andy23
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Philip Wilson:
“580k

http://www.itvmedia.co.uk/highlights/ratings

Down around 300k on last years equivalent episode and also below Plebs inc +1 on Monday.”

I thought that might be the case, many say this series isn't as good as previously, and it's time to call it a day, although with BBC3 being axed this is probably the case anyway.

For me it's gone from must watch highlight to something I record and catch up with whenever.
johnnymc
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“The BBC has the funding to recommission it for a 2nd series, like for The Musketeers and Atlantis. They can't just axe it because its not a massive hit.”

But would I be right in thinking both of those shows got very early commissions before even the run had ended? I think that BBC one have been very quiet over "Our Zoo" in terms of saying anything about its long term future. They haven't rushed to greenlight another series so quickly as "Atlantis" etc. I'm not suggesting they shouldn't but its an expensive drama so it may hold back some of their decision making.
Jaycee Dove
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“An insult to Cbeebies!

Waterloo Road is poor drama in primetime. Who watches it in big numbers apart from kids? Limited cross-generational appeal. That's why it has low ratings.”

The politically correct jump the shark moment when they moved the school to Scotland by bus was the end. It was predicted in the thread on here when announced that it would kill the show. It was so obvious but politics took precedence over sense.

I imagine it has only lasted as long since as it has to justify the cost of the move.

Why not create a new show set in Scotland with some genuine Scottish theme to it instead of take an English school from Rochdale, keep many of the staff and pupils (who were English!) and so in effect make it look like neither one thing nor the other.

Patronising to the audience and to Scotland and missed a great opportunity to create something really different that was Scottish through and through like past successes such as Monarch of the Glen.

Even bringing back Take the High Road would have been a (slightly) more sensible move.
yorkie100
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“"This Life" on BBC TWO ended its series without all ends being tied up, but it sometimes suits a series.

If the BBC don't renew "Our Zoo" there is bound to be a little bit of backlash about their decision as its developed a following at around 5 million. However can't help but think its as far as its going to go in the ratings charts now. I don't think series two will climb at all. It reminds me very much of how "The Paradise" faired in the ratings. A faithful following but unspectacular figures for the drama department to sustain it.”

That is true but they have kept other shows on such numbers and a lot less. I think it has a chance of renewal but it would probably be only one more series anyway so they may think it not worth it.
johnnymc
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“That is true but they have kept other shows on such numbers and a lot less. I think it has a chance of renewal but it would probably be only one more series anyway so they may think it not worth it.”

They may give it another run as they don't tend to give up after just one attempt to launch a show. I was convinced it would be another hit like "Call The Midwife" but I've only seen certain scenes from the show, so can't really tell why it failed to take off.

Can't believe I missed the chance to see Peter (Doctor Who) Capaldi in Edinburgh National Galleries last week! Would have been nice to see the real "Who"
seansnotmyname@
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“As I have said many times about Our Zoo it will likely depend on if it sells well abroad or if TV everywhere has lost interest in feel good well acted, well scripted shows that do not feature guns, sex, car chases or aliens.”


BIB agreed. In the end things like Atlantis and Musketeers were always going to sell abroad, the Beeb can always get money out of those. Our Zoo maybe a tougher sale.

The BBC has to justify their costs more than ever nowadays.
Chris1964
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“The politically correct jump the shark moment when they moved the school to Scotland by bus was the end. It was predicted in the thread on here when announced that it would kill the show. It was so obvious but politics took precedence over sense.

I imagine it has only lasted as long since as it has to justify the cost of the move.”

I used to watch WR on and off, but I haven't seen a minute since they all randomly piled into a minibus and drove to Scotland.
H of De Vil
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“But would I be right in thinking both of those shows got very early commissions before even the run had ended? I think that BBC one have been very quiet over "Our Zoo" in terms of saying anything about its long term future. They haven't rushed to greenlight another series so quickly as "Atlantis" etc. I'm not suggesting they shouldn't but its an expensive drama so it may hold back some of their decision making.”



Yes both got early recommissions before they aired.

They shouldn't be worrying about ratings as much, just producing quality drama. Its still over 5m consolidated.
Pizzatheaction
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Visited by The Devil seemingly and telling JR to commit suicide. I'm not making this up.”



Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“You heard the gun go off, I think. It was years later in the first of the two mediocre TV movies that it was resolved but pretty much just in passing in the script.

Though at least there was continuity there - which is hard to see much of in the new Dallas. Part of its problem. Not enough respect for the old show from someone who admitted she has never seen the original.

Just imagine those behind the new Thunderbirds admitting they had never seen an episode of that? Would not happen. It would be pure luck if it was any good or remotely aligned with the original.

If you revive an old show you have a responsibility to at least know as much as the viewers that you expect to tune in about what made the first incarnation work for so many years. Especially when bringing back the same characters if you do not want to create the impression they have had a brain transplant or been taken over by aliens.”

Thanks. Surprised they didn't choose a fan of the original, though.
Jaycee Dove
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“They may give it another run as they don't tend to give up after just one attempt to launch a show. I was convinced it would be another hit like "Call The Midwife" but I've only seen certain scenes from the show, so can't really tell why it failed to take off.”

I have thought a lot about this. We have discussed all the possible things like schedule and family audience and everyone watching it loved it given the AIs.

So it seems to have just been a kind of show that in the modern world might not work.

If Heartbeat was launched now I suspect it might get similar figures. A loyal following, appreciation from those who watched, but lots of none viewers for whom - in the modern multi channel watch everything everywhere world - it was just too gentle/bland to be must see TV.

If that is true elsewhere then it will not come back. If other nations will still watch it then it should translate and sell and it might.
yorkie100
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“Yes both got early recommissions before they aired.

They shouldn't be worrying about ratings as much, just producing quality drama. Its still over 5m consolidated.”

It was 5.56m last week IIRC.
Pizzatheaction
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by guestofseth:
“Each show has been five minutes longer than last year, despite it running much faster without Bruce messing up every five minutes, it only worked for them last week because of the extra judge (which should never be repeated.) That and the lopsided running order, which I hope is sorted this week, are holding back the show far more than the hosts are, and I say that as someone who is not a fan of Tess. Watched the dances again before and if the good ones were evenly spread out instead of clumped in the second half, and Donny Osmond was wiped from existence, Saturday's episode would have actually been a great show.”

Some of Tess's links have been very short, but they've chopped five minutes off the Pointless Celebrities slot for the 25th, making me think Strictly will start and end a minute or two early.
johnnymc
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“I have thought a lot about this. We have discussed all the possible things like schedule and family audience and everyone watching it loved it given the AIs.

So it seems to have just been a kind of show that in the modern world might not work.

If Heartbeat was launched now I suspect it might get similar figures. A loyal following, appreciation from those who watched, but lots of none viewers for whom - in the modern multi channel watch everything everywhere world - it was just too gentle/bland to be must see TV.

If that is true elsewhere then it will not come back. If other nations will still watch it then it should translate and sell and it might.”

Doubt it will go down without a fight, but I'm thinking of the fate of " Upstairs Downstairs " and "The Paradise" when the audience wasn't there for them, they swiftly axed them.
cylon6
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“As I have said many times about Our Zoo it will likely depend on if it sells well abroad or if TV everywhere has lost interest in feel good well acted, well scripted shows that do not feature guns, sex, car chases or aliens.”

I think Call The Midwife got a second series after two weeks of r ratings and before it was sold anywhere. And CTM is actually a very good seller abroad.
Pizzatheaction
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by NeilVW:
“Further to cylon6's answer, Cold Feet went higher. Its later series fairly often went over 9m officially and the finale in March 2003 scored 10.72m. Best I can find for Murphy's Law is 7.48m for the pilot in September 2001.”



Never brilliant figures for Murphy then. I remember 4m overnights (or possibly officials) for series 5.
yorkie100
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“

Never brilliant figures for Murphy then. I remember 4m overnights (or possibly officials) for series 5. ”

Nesbit was good in Murphys Law though.
Pizzatheaction
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“Nesbit was good in Murphys Law though.”

He was. I loved it.
NeilVW
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“

Never brilliant figures for Murphy then. I remember 4m overnights (or possibly officials) for series 5. ”

Officials of 4.56m / 4.81m / 4.66m for the final series stripped over three nights: Monday 1 - Wednesday 3 October 2007.

ITV competition was Doc Martin (8.58m) / Champions' League (4.79m from 19:30) / Torn (5.47m).

No ITV HD or ITV+1 to think about back then.
yorkie100
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by NeilVW:
“Officials of 4.56m / 4.81m / 4.66m for the final series stripped over three nights: Monday 1 - Wednesday 3 October 2007.

ITV competition was Doc Martin (8.58m) / Champions' League (4.79m from 19:30) / Torn (5.47m).

No ITV HD or ITV+1 to think about back then. ”

So it had pretty tough competition then.
Glenn A
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“If they end up having an hour of ED on Tuesdays, they should split it and show the second half at 8pm. It should at least keep the programme in the 8.30-9pm slot over 2m because viewers have nowhere obvious to go with no junctions on other main channels.

Denting EastEnders has no financial benefit if everyone turns over at 8pm to watch Holby or whatever's on BBC Two/C4/C5.”

I think this could work. Put on some weak filler at 7.30 against Eastenders, have Emmerdale at 8.00, then a strongish gameshow at 8.30 and drama at 9.00. ITV will need to think of something as their 2.5 hours of football will be gone next autumn for at least 3 years.
yorkie100
15-10-2014
Originally Posted by Glenn A:
“I think this could work. Put on some weak filler at 7.30 against Eastenders, have Emmerdale at 8.00, then a strongish gameshow at 8.30 and drama at 9.00. ITV will need to think of something as their 2.5 hours of football will be gone next autumn for at least 3 years.”

This is what I fear will happen. Fill the gap with more soap, cheap filler, gameshow. They will never have enough drama to fill the slot all year so that will finish as cheap filler as well for a lot of the time. In other words almost the same as what they do now when football isnt on.
They should in theory have some extra money but will it be used for Tuesdays?
<<
<
104 of 792
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map