Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“I said that before Friday's ratings come in. I was basing the "Around 2.5m" on previous series ratings. So because it got around the same as Big School, that makes it a good rating?
Citizen Khan got a 1 star review from Telegraph. Vicious was poor for its 1st two episodes, but improved a lot for the rest of the series.
Vicious Christmas special got 3.4m last year, which suggests it has more legs than Citizen Khan.”
“I said that before Friday's ratings come in. I was basing the "Around 2.5m" on previous series ratings. So because it got around the same as Big School, that makes it a good rating?
Citizen Khan got a 1 star review from Telegraph. Vicious was poor for its 1st two episodes, but improved a lot for the rest of the series.
Vicious Christmas special got 3.4m last year, which suggests it has more legs than Citizen Khan.”
Not quite 3.4m, and if we're going to bring in the Christmas special for Vicious, we'd better do the same for Citizen Khan hadn't we? Only fair 'n' all:
Friday 20 December 2013
20:30 - Citizen Khan: 3.07m (14.6%)
* v Text Santa (4.89m/24.5% inc +1 from 20:00-23:00)
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...postcount=7354
Friday 27 December 2013
21:00 - Vicious: 3.10m (13.9%) / 3.27m (14.7%)
* v Death Comes to Pemberley (4.40m/20.1% from 21:00-22:00)
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/news/...oUuyRsf1sKTVcz
So pretty much on a par, factoring in the different slots - one over Christmas, one before Christmas - by noting the similar shares. It's a battle of the pygmies really, and on this evidence, Vicious doesn't appear to have longer legs.




