Originally Posted by cylon6:
“BBC2 need to reintroduce a 90 minute comedy block.”
I don't think there's any great need for that, to be honest. They're probably better off doing what they do now with comedy at 10pm most nights. With news on BBC1 and ITV there's a big floating audience around and it's an obvious alternative, people get used to thinking of BBC2 at 10pm because they know there's usually comedy there (obviously it might be better if BBC3 and BBC4 didn't also show comedy there).
If you stick it all in one go it doesn't neccessarily mean it pulls everything up, it can just as well drag everything down. There's ninety minutes of comedy on BBC1 on Fridays at the moment but it's hardly helping Big School, is it?
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“It was decent but BBC2 and Channel 4 need some big hits. Grandma's House was little watched too. There's only so much budget. You can't have a schedule full of shows that don't take off.”
BBC2 have got plenty of comedy hits, they have QI, Mock The Week, Buzzcocks and Sarah Millican to name but a few, with Russell Howard still to come. Those are all successful shows which provide the flexibility to allow them to also do things like Grandma's House. We know nobody much watched it, you keep on telling us. but those who did watch it thought it was brilliant. Peep Show and The IT Crowd both regularly went under a million for first run episodes on C4 in recent years. Does it matter? Saying those aren't successful shows is to just take one look at the ratings and ignore all other artistic and commercial criteria.
It's not like this is a new thing either. Stewart Lee was getting under three million with Fist of Fun on BBC2 in 1995, at 9pm in a four-channel environment. To be getting a million at 10pm now, in a thousand-channel environment, is I think amazing. BBC2 have always had low-rating shows, that's the point of the channel. They had a load of flops in the Friday comedy slot in the nineties that nobody remembers (The Creatives? Sunnyside Farm? The Fall Guy? Pulp Video?). Certainly as many as they had now, and they relied on a small number of hits like Shooting Stars, Red Dwarf and HIGNFY. Exactly like now, and the channel's still going.
Originally Posted by Zac Quinn:
“The Apprentice does get a repeat doesn't it? On BBC Three? I must be going mad. Very little repeat value in Strictly though, what with it being a live show with a heavy emphasis on the public vote which closes so soon after the Saturday live show goes out.”
In 2006 they used to do a semi-repeat of Strictly on a Sunday night on BBC2, with the main show and the results re-edited into an hour. Couldn't do that when Sunday Strictly began of course, and there is a hell of a lot of it now. ITV can repeat The X Factor as they have nothing else on Sunday afternoons and ITV2 is 24 hours a day and can show what it wants, unlike BBC3 which has stringent criteria over how much BBC1 content it can repeat.
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“All in all, adding to the perception that the BBC has lost its way where BBC one is concerned (with a few notable exceptions).
Leading to more people taking a more negative attitude towards it
And more people (including influential MPs and Ministers) seeing that the BBC is becoming more and more like a commercial broadcaster.”
Despite the fact 24 hours earlier they were getting over twelve million for a PSB-friendly factual programme.
No, Your Home In Their Hands hasn't been very good. But a three-part bit of light factual fluff is the most ridiculous thing to get worked up over. On the face if it Your Home In Their Hands looked like it could be the next DIY SOS, the problem was they executed it incredibly badly. But it wouldn't even appear in a list of the thousand worst things in the history of BBC1.
As for "more and more like a commercial broadcaster", i could mention Eldorado and Cauught In The Act here again. Oh, I just have.