DS Forums

 
 

The Ratings Thread (Part 62)


Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-12-2014, 11:48
JordyD
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,983
It's obvious Simon with his arrogance and cockiness bought back Cherl thinking everything would be ok... Obviously not worked and you could see this happening anyway.

Even if the 2010 panel had returned the following year, it would still decline as it reached its peak. It's in a different era now.

Simon thinking him and Cheryl would save it has led him to be idle about the rest of the show, thinking them two would save it by their own. Cheryl unfortunately is now a has been and so is Simon.
JordyD is offline  
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 07-12-2014, 11:52
Belligerence
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ghosts Forge
Posts: 38,995
I guess first within Cowell's sights for the chop will be Cheryl - he probably expected her return with his would recreate the old 'magic'. They'll probably make it out to be her leaving either way though. Then he probably wouldn't lose any sleep over getting rid of Mel, and probably Louis now too. And what about bland Dermot? Next year should be interesting.

Perhaps most of all what X Factor needs is a new perspective behind the scenes - many of the same execs have been involved for 11 series now. Mark Sidaway the main one on Twitter labelled Strictly a borefest. Lol.
It could do with a break. Lost all perspective trying to battle with Strictly.
Belligerence is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 11:53
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
He had his time, his golden touch is tarnished, more living off other people's ideas, XF as we know ( and settled out of court) is a rip off of Pop Idol. Created by Simon a Fuller 2001/2003, SC changed it a little, but same idea, same slot, same type of contest just change the judges a little. Cowell was the main judge and reinvented the wheel, and Fuller took him to court and SC had to be a judge in the USA on PI and not start XF USA there for a few years.

It's not his idea it was fullers, and BGT SC purchased the UK rights after seeing the success in the USA.
No, his company produces the American version of Got Talent. He holds the brand across the globe. The British show should have launched before the USA version with Paul O'Grady but he fell out with ITV just before the pilot so they put it on hiatus until they found another host (or in this case, hosts).

Now if you'd said it was a rip off of The Gong Show...
Fudd is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 11:53
hyperstarsponge
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North East
Posts: 12,254
I must admit that Snooker was a much better watch then The X Factor last night.
hyperstarsponge is offline Follow this poster on Twitter  
Old 07-12-2014, 11:56
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
I must admit that Snooker was a much better watch then The X Factor last night.
I'm surprised you watched The X Factor considering how much you hate it.
Fudd is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 11:58
JordyD
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,983
So it's not just the snooker who had a balls up?
JordyD is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:00
hyperstarsponge
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North East
Posts: 12,254
I'm surprised you watched The X Factor considering how much you hate it.
At least the Snooker has a small but dedicated audience.
hyperstarsponge is offline Follow this poster on Twitter  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:02
Fudd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
At least the Snooker has a small but dedicated audience.
I'm still surprised you watched The X Factor.

I'd argue The X Factor has a dedicated audience of just under 6m considering that's where it bottomed out on that Friday night opposite Strictly. But is that holding steady or is the dedicated audience also losing faith in the show?
Fudd is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:07
JordyD
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,983
But is that holding steady or is the dedicated audience also losing faith in the show?
Well, as I used to be a big fan of the show, since 2004, always watched it all, I started loosing interest after the Kelly Rowland series, and this is the first year I've not watched. I've watched bits, but I'm not bothered if I miss it or watch it. I used to never miss it.
JordyD is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:11
A.D.P
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7,319
No, his company produces the American version of Got Talent. He holds the brand across the globe. The British show should have launched before the USA version with Paul O'Grady but he fell out with ITV just before the pilot so they put it on hiatus until they found another host (or in this case, hosts).

Now if you'd said it was a rip off of The Gong Show...
Ok,

What about a ripp off of Opportunity Knocks?
A.D.P is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:12
Belligerence
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ghosts Forge
Posts: 38,995
He had his time, his golden touch is tarnished, more living off other people's ideas, XF as we know ( and settled out of court) is a rip off of Pop Idol. Created by Simon a Fuller 2001/2003, SC changed it a little, but same idea, same slot, same type of contest just change the judges a little. Cowell was the main judge and reinvented the wheel, and Fuller took him to court and SC had to be a judge in the USA on PI and not start XF USA there for a few years.

It's not his idea it was fullers, and BGT SC purchased the UK rights after seeing the success in the USA.

XF we all know, we have all seen it coming, is past its use by date and over milked over bloated now hence viewers leaving it, as they all know they can see a better pantomime at their local theatre, and on both we know in advance who will win.
Cowell did rip off Pop Idol but to say it was Fuller's idea and Fuller's alone is incorrect.

All Fuller did was get the ball rolling -- the story goes he was impressed with Popstars' success and invited Cowell to dinner to talk about creating their own music show. Cowell did the pitching, and all it took was two minutes for ITV to say yes. The Beeb made an offer but Heggessey wanted it in-house and she was tentative.
Belligerence is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:21
Glenn A
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
Not quite, Richard...

Pointless Celebrities: 5.92m (30.8%)
The X Factor: 7.04m (31.0%) exc +1
* peak: 7.87m (34.2%) at 21:00 exc +1

X Factor's share amongst younger viewers, from 4 to 44 hovers around 38% to 40%.
Dire, TXF has lost 40 per cent of its audience since 2009. People are just tired of the sob stories, the mediocre talent and the endless hype in the tabloids. However, notice how Pointless Celebrities is reaching hit status, being a shade under 6 million.
I am convinced Cowell will pull TXF at the end of its contract, on current trends the show will be down to 5 million by 2o16.
Glenn A is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:23
Glenn A
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
Ok,

What about a ripp off of Opportunity Knocks?
I'd say more New Faces, as BGT has a panel like New Faces. Op Knocks only had one presenter.
Glenn A is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:27
grondagronda
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 663
All of these modern talent shows were *ahem* inspired by the daddy of reality - Survivor.

Same cast, weekly eliminations. A deft blend of entertainment and documentary.

Big Brother came along, with its viewer interactivity, and the rest just cloned that model.

The fact that Simon has no new ideas is because telly hasn't had any new ideas for him to *ahem* take inspiration from.
grondagronda is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:33
Glenn A
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
All of these modern talent shows were *ahem* inspired by the daddy of reality - Survivor.

Same cast, weekly eliminations. A deft blend of entertainment and documentary.

Big Brother came along, with its viewer interactivity, and the rest just cloned that model.

The fact that Simon has no new ideas is because telly hasn't had any new ideas for him to *ahem* take inspiration from.
I always thought BB was the grandaddy of reality, starting in Holland in 1999. Indeed its first series had an episode that ran for 24 hours and is in the Guiness Book of Records. Survivor doesn't really have much in common with TXF, but I suppose it had some influence( the son of Survivor, though, is IAC).
It's odd that while Survivor only ran for two series and was cancelled when it failed to beat BB in the ratings, in America the show is still going strong.
Glenn A is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:33
H of De Vil
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 11,449
There is no point trying to boost viewing figures by paying big bucks fr new judges. The fact is Xf is past its sell by date (but still holding a 7.5m audience) and viewers who have left will never return. The only possibility to stablise TXF is to make the best show possible.Enough with the novelty acts, enough with the VT's that are so fake (like reading from a script), the judges entrance fanfare. Its need a fresh take. The mass of adverts every 5minutes do it no favours.

ITV really need to prioritse their 10-part, dramas next year over TXf if they are scheduled together. If it gets a good audience its a possibilty it might outlive TXF, and make them more money with overseas sales.
H of De Vil is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:38
Glenn A
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
There is no point trying to boost viewing figures by paying big bucks fr new judges. The fact is Xf is past its sell by date (but still holding a 7.5m audience) and viewers who have left will never return. The only possibility to stablise TXF is to make the best show possible.Enough with the novelty acts, enough with the VT's that are so fake (like reading from a script), the judges entrance fanfare. Its need a fresh take. The mass of adverts every 5minutes do it no favours.

ITV really need to prioritse their 10-part, dramas next year over TXf if they are scheduled together. If it gets a good audience its a possibilty it might outlive TXF, and make them more money with overseas sales.
I think it will continue to slide, it's been on too long and viewers are getting fed up. I don't think it will decline like BB did and fall out of favour with the mags and the redtops, but I can imagine the last series playing to 5 million.
TXF has been very profitable for ITV, making £ 50 million a year at its peak, but it's also a very expensive show and now ratings are falling, ITV and Cowell will probably call it a day in two years time. Dramas, if they are successful, can also run for years on ITV 3, whereas TXF is more or less an instant show.
Glenn A is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:41
soupnazi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 593
Simon cared more about the USA show than the UK show. It was imperative the former took off and if the latter took a hit then so be it - though I don't think he expected such a hit.

Then again, for all the finger pointing at the panel the production for 2011 was atrocious and exaberared the decline - the 'point and laugh' final audition, the saga of Frankie Cocazza taking over boot camp, axing four acts, including the pre-live favourite, without a public vote in the first live show... it was a complete mess and never recovered.
yes that 'Big Twist' quadruple-elimination was terribly executed. This year there's nothing glaringly wrong. It's just a general malaise with the format that is causing the decrease. I think its time is up, but even getting 5m would be OK for ITV, give how hard it has been to find any new entertainment hits.
soupnazi is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:44
Belligerence
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ghosts Forge
Posts: 38,995
I always thought BB was the grandaddy of reality, starting in Holland in 1999. Indeed its first series had an episode that ran for 24 hours and is in the Guiness Book of Records. Survivor doesn't really have much in common with TXF, but I suppose it had some influence( the son of Survivor, though, is IAC).
It's odd that while Survivor only ran for two series and was cancelled when it failed to beat BB in the ratings, in America the show is still going strong.
Survivor was brilliant., the right show at the wrong time. Would be cool if there was a civilian IAC.
Belligerence is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:45
H of De Vil
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 11,449
"And for those who think the BBC waste money, you can make 24 episodes of Pointless Celebrities for the same price of ONE episode of X Factor" - Richard Osman on Twitter.

Stupid comparison. PC is not the BBC's main Saturday night programme, SCD is. Its like comparing The Chase achieving 4.5m to The Voice dropping below 6m for a LIVE show when the rights to it cost millions.

Trust the Radio Times to pick up on this.

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2014-...s-better-value
H of De Vil is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:46
Jokanovic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: West London
Posts: 5,659
I agree. Finding new entertainment shows is incredibly difficult.
They will plod on at least for another two series though I doubt there is anything they can do to stop the decline.
Perhaps as someone mentioned, 4 new younger judges who are maybe more relevant.
Louis has just become a joke judge.
Jokanovic is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:49
sally_bowles
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,264
Could this be the week Countryfile beats TXF?

A show in its death throes. Amusingly itv has no alternative but to keep it going as nothing else would get even 5m in its place.

Re bbc1's idents. Love the endboards not exactly wowed by the ident. Don't like the circle of trees. Looks more wintry than xmassy. Lacks the impact of the endboard tree scene.

Have only seen the one before Atlantis and the short form presumably serious one that aired before Andrew Marr. Perhaps I need to see the variants.
that is to cater for the none christian amongst us, which is a large proportion of the population.
sally_bowles is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:51
sally_bowles
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,264
"And for those who think the BBC waste money, you can make 24 episodes of Pointless Celebrities for the same price of ONE episode of X Factor" - Richard Osman on Twitter.

Stupid comparison. PC is not the BBC's main Saturday night programme, SCD is. Its like comparing The Chase achieving 4.5m to The Voice dropping below 6m for a LIVE show when the rights to it cost millions.

Trust the Radio Times to pick up on this.

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2014-...s-better-value
its all fun in the ratings war. love to see simon's face.

bless.
sally_bowles is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 12:58
JordyD
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,983
Mr Osman being smug as well now? Wonder how his show would have held up without overlapping and being a lead in with Strictly?
JordyD is offline  
Old 07-12-2014, 13:00
derek500
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 20,370
It could do with a break. Lost all perspective trying to battle with Strictly.
Doesn't X Factor still beat Strictly in the demos they aim the show at?

Can't imagine TalkTalk sponsoring X Factor if the majority of its audience was 55+ like SCD.
derek500 is offline  
 
Closed Thread




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21.