• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 62)
<<
<
550 of 792
>>
>
wizzywick
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“Those decreeing it should win BAFTA's, awards etc. on the drama thread do for most dramas that are cut above the rest, either on BBC1 and ITV. Just like for Happy Valley, Marvellous, Cilla, even The Missing.

I haven't seen anyobody suggest its the best drama ever created, if they have point it out to me. But what your suggesting is exactly the same as when a BBC drama has an impact. This thread if filled with posters fawning over a drama, praising it to high hills.

Let's face it some on here stick to their favourite channel and do not budge from 'Channel 1', and will not watch ITV. Others are more open to watching a broad range of channels, like me I watch BBC One dramas, BBC Two dramas, ITV, occasionally Ch4 (but not very often).

If it was on BBC1 I would have watched it, like I have done with The Missing, Remember Me etc.”

Perhaps you would H, you are generally a lot more open minded about TV programmes, though there are a couple who probably wouldn't. You also have to bear in mind that it won't win any awards if ITV don't put it forward. I have every suspicion that Cilla will be their main choice for drama as the category it will be in will be just that: a category. People are possibly saying it's deserving of a Bafta because ITV drama this year has been a little sparse, and when a good one comes along, it is more memorable. I still maintain that compared to other mini-series' this year, this one is not on that level. For instance, The 7.49 back in January, again featruring Sheridan Smith, was superb. Of course the best drama of the year has to go to "Edge of Heaven"!
Dancc
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by Glenn A:
“Even if TXF was on BBC One, I wouldn't watch it, but I know was it on there, some people would say it was a marvellous show simply because it was on the BBC and others saying it was derivative and a waste of licence payers money.”

Talking of TXF, is there any point anybody tuning into the final tomorrow night? I'm seeing this Fleur East everywhere. Front page news this week and topped the iTunes charts already. Got it in the bag surely?

I'm sure the usual crowd these days of about 7.5m will turn up, but I don't see it getting much if any boost when the result appears to be a foregone conclusion this year.
wizzywick
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Talking of TXF, is there any point anybody tuning into the final tomorrow night? I'm seeing this Fleur East everywhere. Front page news this week and topped the iTunes charts already. Got it in the bag surely?

I'm sure the usual crowd these days of about 7.5m will turn up, but I don't see it getting much if any boost when the result appears to be a foregone conclusion this year.”

Could it be that Cowell is playing a "Boyle Card"? By that I mean heavily promoting (albeit silently) a finalist as if it's a surefire winner in order to deliberately generate a once non-existent buzz surrounding the other contestant(s)? I remember when Susan Boyle was on BGT and it was practically assumed she'd win. She was everywhere and anywhere and on the night, interest diverted to the dance troupe who eventually won! (Sorry, I forget the name)Diversity????? Anyway, I am trying to say that by promoting one act could ultimately lead to interest in others as viewers may be curious on the night.
jlp95bwfc
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Talking of TXF, is there any point anybody tuning into the final tomorrow night? I'm seeing this Fleur East everywhere. Front page news this week and topped the iTunes charts already. Got it in the bag surely?

I'm sure the usual crowd these days of about 7.5m will turn up, but I don't see it getting much if any boost when the result appears to be a foregone conclusion this year.”

I'd say it's one of the most open finals in recent years. Fleur only became favourite last week. Andrea and Ben have both been considered as the favourite at earlier points in the live shows.
Zac Quinn
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by NeilVW:
“Indeed, BBC One +1 won't cost anywhere near £85m.”

I apologise, I took that figure from a tweet by a regular contributor to the thread. Must have misinterpreted it.
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“BBC Music Awards: 3.94m (18.3%)”

Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“I don't think its that bad either, but it remains to be seen whether it can build a meaning and tradition in the same way the Brits has done. I presume this is the aim. Only 3 or 4 awards though? Seems more like a glorified third yearly edition of Top of the Pops. Not that I saw it.”

Originally Posted by Cestrian18:
“Decent Start for the BBC Music Awards last night, considering it's an inaugural event I actually think it did rather well, (in Comparison last year's BRITS pulled in 4.2 million (4.6 inc +1)) The Beeb will certainty be happy to build on that next year, it does seem to have the capacity to be the premier show of its type in a year or two as there are some very positive reviews of it out there this morning.”

Pity it couldn't at least get into 4m's but enough to be going on with. Now they should take two years to perfect the format, then after X Factor ends in 2016 move the 2017 edition to a Saturday night to form an 'awards weekend' with SPOTY following on the Sunday.
Originally Posted by ronant:
“Question Time?!?”

Originally Posted by NeilVW:
“Question Time

04.12.14, 22:45 - 2.32m (22.2%)
* Sajid Javid MP, Yvette Cooper MP, Shirley Williams, Omid Djalili, Jill Kirby

11.12.14, 22:40 - 3.40m (29.2%)
* Penny Mordaunt MP, Mary Creagh MP, Nigel Farage MEP, Russell Brand, Camilla Cavendish

Up +47% in volume and +32% in share on last week.”

Shame it's now taking a break until January so there's no hope of any extra viewers from last night sticking around.
Originally Posted by NeilVW:
“Must have been one of the youngest-skewing BBC One Thursday evenings for a while, with The One Show at the Music Awards, EE, the awards themselves, and Brand on QT.”

More please.
lewiep93
12-12-2014
Thought I'd post this If there are any mistakes feel free to correct them.

The X Factor Final (Results)
2013 (19:30-21:28) - 9.51m/9.73m (36.3%/37.1%), peak - 11.90m (42.7%)
2012 (19:39-21:39) - 10.94m/11.07m (39.1%/39.7%), peak - 12.53m/12.76m (44.0%/44.8%)
2011 (19:29-21:30) - 12.87m/13.10m (44.3%/45.2%), peak - 15.27m/15.50m (49.5%/50.2%)
2010 (19:29-21:31) - 17.16m (55.0%), peak - 19.44m (60.5%)
2009 (19:29-21:27) - 15.62m (53.2%), peak - 19.11m (61.9%)
2008 (21:45-22:51) - 13.46m (54.4%), peak - 14.59m (61.4%)
2007 (21:36-22:42) - 11.36m (49.1%), peak - 12.74m (55.1%)
2006 (21:29-22:30) - 10.37m (44.0%), peak - 12.57m (56.3%)
2005 (21:10-22:10) - 9.30m (35.9%)
2004 (21:30-22:00) - 9.70m (41.0%), peak - 10.50m (45.0%)

I have no idea how Sundays XF will rate. 8.5m to 9.5m I think.
jlp95bwfc
12-12-2014
You forget how amazing some of those X Factor Final ratings were. It really was event TV which you felt that everyone was watching back in 2010. It captivated the nation. Clearly destroying the panel at its peak killed the show.
Chris1964
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by Steve Williams:
“It also reminds me a bit of this, from 2001...
http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/schedules...01-19#at-20.00
...when the Beeb were throwing quite a lot of LE at the wall to see what stuck. I remember that was originally scheduled for a Saturday teatime and it first appeared in the Saturday TV guides in the Sunday papers, to much bemusement. The whole day's schedule is a great example of how odd BBC1 was immediately after they moved the news with shows starting at odd times (like 8.50) and odd one-offs flung in all kinds of places. Also note that night the unsuccessful attempt to rebrand Clive Anderson's chat show.Not really breaking news, this, it was in the schedules for January 3rd when they were posted here several days ago. I don't think it's that strange at all, a few years back we had The World's Greatest Elvis which was only a two-part programme.




Well, presumably not ever in terms of seven days a week because it would have gone lower when it ended up at 1am on Saturday night after that delayed England match just before the World Cup. And it went lower opposite the Olympics opening ceremony as well. It must be one of the lowest in something like normal circumstances, though. Any benefit it might have got from a larger than usual ABC1 inheritance from the drama was offset by them all switching over to Question Time.”

The moon landings are still breaking news to me so Iv no chance with something posted here three days ago And the Elvis programme I must have tried to forget presumably through sheer awfulness. However he has still got one up on Sinatra given he is only worth one show, Sinatra is probably turning in his grave as I type
Zac Quinn
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“Thought I'd post this If there are any mistakes feel free to correct them.

The X Factor Final (Results)
2013 (19:30-21:28) - 9.51m/9.73m (36.3%/37.1%), peak - 11.90m (42.7%)
2012 (19:39-21:39) - 10.94m/11.07m (39.1%/39.7%), peak - 12.53m/12.76m (44.0%/44.8%)
2011 (19:29-21:30) - 12.87m/13.10m (44.3%/45.2%), peak - 15.27m/15.50m (49.5%/50.2%)
2010 (19:29-21:31) - 17.16m (55.0%), peak - 19.44m (60.5%)
2009 (19:29-21:27) - 15.62m (53.2%), peak - 19.11m (61.9%)
2008 (21:45-22:51) - 13.46m (54.4%), peak - 14.59m (61.4%)
2007 (21:36-22:42) - 11.36m (49.1%), peak - 12.74m (55.1%)
2006 (21:29-22:30) - 10.37m (44.0%), peak - 12.57m (56.3%)
2005 (21:10-22:10) - 9.30m (35.9%)
2004 (21:30-22:00) - 9.70m (41.0%), peak - 10.50m (45.0%)

I have no idea how Sundays XF will rate. 8.5m to 9.5m I think.”

I'll go 8.5m. More interesting will be the peak - could it be set for a decline of 10m in just four years?
newkid30
12-12-2014
Just to put some perspective on TXF final ratings, does anyone have these numbers?
What did GBBO finale get? over night and official?
What did IAC finale get?
Thanks
Zac Quinn
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by newkid30:
“Just to put some perspective on TXF final ratings, does anyone have these numbers?
What did GBBO finale get? over night and official?
What did IAC finale get?
Thanks ”

GBBO an overnight 12.3m turned into 13.5m consolidated. XF has absolutely no hope of shaking so much as a tail at that.
JordyD
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by jlp95bwfc:
“Clearly destroying the panel at its peak killed the show.”

It would have started to fall either way. The panel wasn't that special at all.
jlp95bwfc
12-12-2014
The problem with the X Factor Final is that it's bloated beyond belief. 4 hours in total over the weekend and a casual viewer who would just tune in for the final probably wouldn't bother sitting through all that. If the results show was reduced in length then there might be a chance of a decent jump compare to previous live shows but it won't happen. ITV probably prefer 8.5m tuning in over a longer period.
Chris1964
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by jlp95bwfc:
“You forget how amazing some of those X Factor Final ratings were. It really was event TV which you felt that everyone was watching back in 2010. It captivated the nation. Clearly destroying the panel at its peak killed the show.”

Yes I agree. As I have said before to build to get regular 14 million audiences is one of the greatest ratings achievements in the multi-channel environment. Gloriously over the top pantomime tv and yet (whatever the reasons were) rather thrown away at its peak. The next season audition stage started out with huge interest iirc but the public soon learnt they weren't getting the same from the new judging line up and I think the decline has been far quicker because of it. As Dannc says, its even worse when the winner is telegraphed.
jlp95bwfc
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by JordyD:
“It would have started to fall either way. The panel wasn't that special at all.”

It's no coincidence that the rot set in at that point though. That panel had another 2 years of monster ratings in it at least (maybe not 19m but certainly much higher than it actually got).
newkid30
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by jlp95bwfc:
“The problem with the X Factor Final is that it's bloated beyond belief. 4 hours in total over the weekend and a casual viewer who would just tune in for the final probably wouldn't bother sitting through all that. If the results show was reduced in length then there might be a chance of a decent jump compare to previous live shows but it won't happen. ITV probably prefer 8.5m tuning in over a longer period.”

In fairness it has been bloated over a weekend for a good few years, but once upon a time it could pull huge numbers even over a longer time span.
jlp95bwfc
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by newkid30:
“In fairness it has been bloated over a weekend for a good few years, but once upon a time it could pull huge numbers even over a longer time span. ”

Yes I agree but if you're trying to entice casual viewers back then that isn't the way to do it. It's fine when the viewers are already hooked.
johnnymc
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“Yes I agree. As I have said before to build to get regular 14 million audiences is one of the greatest ratings achievements in the multi-channel environment. Gloriously over the top pantomime tv and yet (whatever the reasons were) rather thrown away at its peak. The next season audition stage started out with huge interest iirc but the public soon learnt they weren't getting the same from the new judging line up and I think the decline has been far quicker because of it. As Dannc says, its even worse when the winner is telegraphed.”

Regardless of past eras it will still get a massive audience over the weekend and rate among the highest of any entertainment show in 2014. A lot has changed in the television landscape since 2010, other genres such as the serial dramas "Coronation Street" and "EastEnders" were pulling in huge numbers in their anniversary year of 2010 and consider first how fragmented the audience has become and how fickle the younger viewers of "The X Factor" are. Its still pulling in a very decent if not spectacular audience for ITV and Cowell seems to be aware it needs work. ITV have yet to find anything as successful for an Saturday night in the autumn. Its slightly unfair to expect it to reach the heights of 2010 and use that as a benchmark.
Zac Quinn
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“ITV have yet to find anything as successful for an Saturday night in the autumn.”

Approach NBC and negiotate a fee for a UK version of Saturday Night Live, sorted. By 2016 it will have been almost 30 years since anyone did a version of SNL over here, worth a go.
johnnymc
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by Zac Quinn:
“Approach NBC and negiotate a fee for a UK version of Saturday Night Live, sorted.”

Well Zac you may be on to something there, but they need to be looking for a replacement before removing "The X Factor" its still pulling in a sizeable part of the audience that other ITV programmes can't get.
wizzywick
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by Zac Quinn:
“Approach NBC and negiotate a fee for a UK version of Saturday Night Live, sorted. By 2016 it will have been almost 30 years since anyone did a version of SNL over here, worth a go.”

Excuse my ignorance, but what exactly is Saturday Night Live? I realise it's some kind of late night US comedy show, but what is its format?
Andy23
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by James J:
“Russell Brand vs Nigel Farage.

Described as a "posh Jeremy Kyle".”

Indeed, with rough looking audience members shouting at each other, it was like a political Jeremy Kyle show, one of those ratings grabbing editions they do every now and then. In the end Brand initially took over the whole show, and then ended up looking bad, I doubt he will go on again.

Originally Posted by cylon6:
“"@overnightstv: The #BBCMUsicAwards, from 8pm on BBC1, won most of its 2-hour slot (after #Emmerdale), with avge 3.9m/18.3%"

"@overnightstv: Peak 5-min audience for inaugural #BBCMusicAwards was 4.7m/21.8% at 9pm."

"@overnightstv: Conclusion of #TheLostHonourOfChristopherJefferies on ITV at 9pm drew 2.9m/14.1%, and 229k/1.6 on +1."”

Shame again about Lost honour, but it did retain most of the audience from Wednesday

BBC Music Awards rating wasn't exciting either way, the fact there were hardly any awards was a bit strange. Interesting to see if any changes will be made before next year

Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“I said the Jeffries thing would tank weeks ago and so it proved.

Folk are just not interested in these real life crime biopics. Especially padded out to 3 hours over 2 nights? Was there that much to it or was Simon Cowell on the production team? ”

I see we have now moved into the realms of 'it rated low, therefore it must have been rubbish, let's laugh and slag it off'

Good programmes can rate low you know, even on ITV.

Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“It would just get completely lost over Christmas. And I garuntee it would have rated even worse during the festive period. Despite some lesser rating spots on the BBc between Xmas and NYD, I imagine even Mapp and Lucia (despite the niche sounding title) would have toppled The Lost Honour with over 1m between them.”

Exactly, those who think it would have rated better between Christmas and New Year obviously don't follow those ratings closely, it would have been completely lost, clashing with numerous major programmes.
Andy23
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Talking of TXF, is there any point anybody tuning into the final tomorrow night? I'm seeing this Fleur East everywhere. Front page news this week and topped the iTunes charts already. Got it in the bag surely?

I'm sure the usual crowd these days of about 7.5m will turn up, but I don't see it getting much if any boost when the result appears to be a foregone conclusion this year.”

As Steve regularly points out about bloated entertainment shows, it isn't there to just give out the result, it is there to entertain for numerous hours. Yes they could show the results in a 10 minutes long show and get 15m, but besides a number on a top ratings list, it wouldn't serve any other purpose.
Zac Quinn
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Excuse my ignorance, but what exactly is Saturday Night Live? I realise it's some kind of late night US comedy show, but what is its format?”

A recurring cast of players perform sketches satirising topical events, along with a different 'personality' each week who not only joins in with the sketches but performs an opening monologue and then acts as a 'host'. There is also a 'special guest musician' who performs whatever they're promoting - like X Factor but in multiple blocks. There is also a house band, and often the sketches include cameo appearances by other celebrities. It's possibly a bit adult for 8pm but after 9pm it'd be great if they did it right.
JordyD
12-12-2014
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Excuse my ignorance, but what exactly is Saturday Night Live? I realise it's some kind of late night US comedy show, but what is its format?”

It sounds like a programme that's outstayed it's welcome by many years and is only getting renewed as there's nothing better to put on?
<<
<
550 of 792
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map