• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 62)
<<
<
62 of 792
>>
>
C14E
12-10-2014
Strictly seems to be following X Factor this year in the unpredictable stakes - a couple of hefty y-o-y declines this series but also some really solid consistent figures as well. XF on the right side of 7.5m and up on last week despite the clash and only slightly down on last year (less than 5%). With Strictly down quite a bit, the gap between the two doesn't look half bad.

Originally Posted by grahamzxy:
“A lot of tedious Samuel bashing I see, people will notice that he never retaliates... Sticks and stones spring to mind.”

You're right, I think you're meant to use a club on trolls.

Anyone got one to hand?

Originally Posted by James J:
“#StrictlyComeDancing peaked last night at 7.55pm with 9.32m/40.8%. #TheXFactor peaked at 8.40pm with 9.27m/38.9% (including +1).”

That's tight, the 5 minute peaks always work better for ITV shows as they indicate a peak audience actually watching the show rather than the 15's which include 4 minutes of ads.

I think ITV may have got it spot on with the scheduling last night. 444,000 on +1 (included in the 7.7m figure) and an increase on the main channel as well. Also, we've seen time and time again that X Factor will peak shortly before 9pm and then start dipping. Had they gone on beyond 10pm it could have been worse than airing against Strictly. Plus, such a late start and late finish damages the rest of the schedule.
Fudd
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Only 2.7 m for the chase, very poor. That is the power of SCD. A few weeks ago it was getting 4m. But SCD has shaved off a million from the chases figures.”

The question is what else could they air there? I thought starting Celebrity Chase at the same time as Strictly would give it a slight boost but obviously not.

Family drama is the obvious choice but would they really throw Beowulf, Jekyll and Hyde or Thunderbirds against Strictly and risk it not sticking? Comedy worked to an extent with TV Burp but that only took up 30 minutes and they have little in pre-watershed comedy outside Birds of a Feather. It's a bit like the BBC's conundrum with Downton - even though the latter is bleeding viewers it's still very difficult to schedule against.
AlexiR
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“The problem for XF is that the audience levels rise straight after SCD finishes. But the audience level then starts dropping from about 9.15 pm onwards. So there's only really a half an hour window between 8.30 to 9pm when XF really has a good free run.

Itv starting XF later next week will help boost XF slightly but worth remembering that the 10.20 finish won't do it any favours. SCD will hopefully see a nice boost next week with such a small overlap.”

You've certainly changed your tune overnight. Yesterday this was the greatest and craftiest piece of scheduling since time began.
SamuelW
12-10-2014
Look at the breakdown:

Time ………. BBC1 ……………… ITV ……………… BBC2 ……………… CH4 ……………… CH5
18:00 ….. 4.5 (28.2%) ….. 1.6 ( 9.8%) ….. 0.6 ( 3.6%) ….. 0.9 ( 5.7%) ….. 0.6 ( 3.8%)
18:15 ….. 5.1 (30.4%) ….. 1.8 (10.6%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.9%) ….. 0.8 ( 5.0%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.9%)
18:30 ….. 7.0 (36.7%) ….. 2.2 (11.6%) ….. 0.6 ( 3.3%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.8%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.4%)
18:45 ….. 8.0 (40.1%) ….. 2.7 (13.4%) ….. 0.8 ( 3.8%) ….. 0.3 ( 1.7%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.3%)
19:00 ….. 8.6 (42.4%) ….. 3.3 (16.4%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.3%) ….. 0.3 ( 1.3%) ….. 0.5 ( 2.4%)
19:15 ….. 9.2 (43.7%) ….. 3.5 (16.9%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.3%) ….. 0.3 ( 1.3%) ….. 0.4 ( 2.1%)
19:30 ….. 9.1 (38.6%) ….. 6.4 (27.3%) ….. 0.5 ( 2.2%) ….. 0.2 ( 1.1%) ….. 0.5 ( 2.0%)
19:45 ….. 9.2 (39.5%) ….. 6.3 (26.8%) ….. 0.5 ( 2.0%) ….. 0.2 ( 1.0%) ….. 0.5 ( 2.0%)
20:00 ….. 9.0 (37.3%) ….. 7.5 (30.9%) ….. 0.6 ( 2.4%) ….. 0.4 ( 1.6%) ….. 0.4 ( 1.8%)
20:15 ….. 9.1 (37.3%) ….. 7.5 (30.8%) ….. 0.6 ( 2.6%) ….. 0.5 ( 2.2%) ….. 0.6 ( 2.3%)
20:30 ….. 6.5 (27.6%) ….. 8.4 (35.6%) ….. 1.4 ( 5.7%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.1%) ….. 0.6 ( 2.5%)
20:45 ….. 4.9 (21.3%) ….. 8.5 (36.6%) ….. 1.7 ( 7.4%) ….. 0.9 ( 3.8%) ….. 0.6 ( 2.7%)
21:00 ….. 4.9 (21.6%) ….. 8.4 (36.9%) ….. 0.8 ( 3.6%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.0%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.3%)
21:15 ….. 4.3 (19.2%) ….. 8.1 (36.3%) ….. 0.9 ( 3.9%) ….. 0.7 ( 3.2%) ….. 0.8 ( 3.6%)
21:30 ….. 3.5 (16.1%) ….. 7.9 (35.6%) ….. 1.0 ( 4.5%) ….. 1.0 ( 4.5%) ….. 0.9 ( 3.9%)
21:45 ….. 4.1 (18.9%) ….. 7.7 (35.7%) ….. 0.5 ( 2.3%) ….. 0.9 ( 4.1%) ….. 0.9 ( 4.1%)

SCD had 9.2million between 19.15-19.30 but then once XF started, it didnt go above 9.2m for any quarter. With the way SCD was building, SCD would've rated around 10m just before 8pm if XF started at its usual post-8pm timeslot. #

XF did poor between 7.30-8pm, absolutely battered by SCD by about 3m viewers! Its audience started to tail off from 9.15pm onwards when total tv audiences start decreasing, so that doesnt bode well for next Saturday when it airs all the way till 10.20pm. Looking at that breakdown, next Saturday it could be averaging only 7.4m inc +1 between 10-10.15pm.
Andy_Smith1
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by Drifter:
“The other thing is X Factor, aside from starting halfway into Strictly, has some pretty mean competition during its entire run - even Casualty at the end. Strictly has NOTHING to bother it.

That's two facts that are going to naturally damage it that have nothing to do with its quality. Yes a lot of people are tired of these shows, it will have naturally lost viewers to that too, but it seems to me the other factors are bigger.

Now imagine if ITV actually turned up and gave X Factor a strong lead in that doubly boosted the show and ate into Strictly. The mind boggles..”

But the Chase was strong with 4m and strictly took viewers from it ? And you can't just throw away the hour and 5 minute clash as no competition
Good for Doctor Who really liked last night, maybe Frank Skinner and Foxes have big fan bases.
guestofseth
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by ronant:
“The hour long clash really hurt both shows. Will post the 5 minute breakdown of I can later, but Strictly was going up and up until 7.30. X Factor gained viewers once Strictly was over, but then lost quite a few of them...”

Will be interesting to see how the hour without the clash rated compared to last week, I'm betting it was around the same, indicating Strictly being down was everything to do with the clash and nothing to do with the quality.

Strictly was always going to be down, every week we see it starts of relatively low and rises so when you stop that rise prematurely the overall rating will be down.
Score
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by ronant:
“The hour long clash really hurt both shows. Will post the 5 minute breakdown of I can later, but Strictly was going up and up until 7.30. X Factor gained viewers once Strictly was over, but then lost quite a few of them...”

Not surprising really, the clash was always going to cause problems. Then X Factor tailing off again isn't too surprising, it's audience always tails off after around 9pm.
dennisboy
12-10-2014
A poor rating for Strictly. That must be its lowest Week 3 Rating for quite a while? I think that considering the clash, X Factor was solid.
johnnymc
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by sw2963:
“Strictly need to put Claudia as the main presenter and relegate Tess to the points. Bruce had star quality for me. Plus there was a run of 5 very bland performers in the middle which tempted me to turn over to see its rival as I felt I was waiting for the main event of Doctor Who.

Donny Osmond was atrocious.”

There is work to be done on making "Strictly Come Dancing" the ratings giant of Saturdays. A fifth judge was irrelevant. Too many bland contestants. Tess underperforming. I think they should have some shock tactics in there and surprise the celebrities by having a double eviction process here and there and cut the running time. There's lots for the BBC to fill on Saturdays as "Casualty" is already being forced to the edges of peak time.
Andy23
12-10-2014
What happened to clashes being great for the programme that comes on first, brilliant scheduling from SCD crushing TXF for an extended period?

Now apparently we are being told that clashes effect both programmes?
C14E
12-10-2014
STRICTLY:
6.30pm 7.0
6.45pm 8.0
7.00pm 8.6
7.15pm 9.2
7.30pm 9.1
7.45pm 9.2
8.00pm 9.0
8.15pm 9.1

X FACTOR (inc +1):
7.30pm 6.5
7.45pm 6.3
8.00pm 7.5
8.15pm 7.5
8.30pm 8.5
8.45pm 8.4
9.00pm 8.4
9.15pm 8.1
9.30pm 7.8
9.45pm 7.7
Fudd
12-10-2014
Thanks for the breakdown.

The X Factor jumped by over 1m viewers at 8pm - people were obviously caught out by the start time. The final quarter would have been hurt by the early finish so the drop off isn't quite as bad as it looks but still a concern for next week.
AlexiR
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“The question is what else could they air there? I thought starting Celebrity Chase at the same time as Strictly would give it a slight boost but obviously not.

Family drama is the obvious choice but would they really throw Beowulf, Jekyll and Hyde or Thunderbirds against Strictly and risk it not sticking? Comedy worked to an extent with TV Burp but that only took up 30 minutes and they have little in pre-watershed comedy outside Birds of a Feather. It's a bit like the BBC's conundrum with Downton - even though the latter is bleeding viewers it's still very difficult to schedule against.”

I think if they want to win back any ground in the slot then they need to be bold and schedule something big there. The Celebrity Chase while a solid performer usually is also eminently missable in much the same way Pointless Celebrities would be airing opposite The X Factor. I'm not entirely sure what the solution to the problem is though. If its even a problem. As has been said before they probably don't want anything too successful in that slot since it would impact the ad load for The X Factor.
yorkie100
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“IF this decline is repeated over the next couple of weeks, then maybe there is a case to answer. Whether that would then be down to a repetitive format (which, in truth, they keep on messing with anyway by introducing new dances, being more free with the interpretation of the rules, having more & more silly props, songs that really don't suit the dance, and costumes that are much more about the theme or the song than the dance itself).”

Arnt all formats repetitive though, and I thought thats what people like?
dennisboy
12-10-2014
It will obviously go up next week but I wouldn't be too surprised if it was posting 1m+ declines all series. The results show has no clash with X Factor's Tommorrow so it should be solid on last week. Which could put it ahead of the performance show.
sw2963
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“There is work to be done on making "Strictly Come Dancing" the ratings giant of Saturdays. A fifth judge was irrelevant. Too many bland contestants. Tess underperforming. I think they should have some shock tactics in there and surprise the celebrities by having a double eviction process here and there and cut the running time. There's lots for the BBC to fill on Saturdays as "Casualty" is already being forced to the edges of peak time.”

True. Tess is too beige for me. It needs somebody with sparkle and edge. Even Alison Hammond would be better with Claudia.

Tess' interaction with the studio audience and judges is vital in keeping the audience's interests sustained during these longer shows.
jlp95bwfc
12-10-2014
The X Factor 7:30pm start time caught out a million viewers. Next week will be much higher.
pjh8
12-10-2014
So the clash didn't hurt Strictly as it had it's highest ratings while XF was on so no excuse for Strictly's drop..
yorkie100
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“What happened to clashes being great for the programme that comes on first, brilliant scheduling from SCD crushing TXF for an extended period?

Now apparently we are being told that clashes effect both programmes?”

I have always said clashes affect both programs but necessarily equally.
AlexiR
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“What happened to clashes being great for the programme that comes on first, brilliant scheduling from SCD crushing TXF for an extended period?

Now apparently we are being told that clashes effect both programmes?”

In fairness it clearly was better for Strictly than The X Factor last night.
Jokanovic
12-10-2014
BBC won't be happy with the drop but the consolation is its still the number one show on a Saturday night and you won't hear Simon or Louis talking about ratings as they used to.
SamuelW
12-10-2014
SCD's strategy of keeping the best acts till the final half an hour kinda worked. Here is the analysis:

Last week between 6.30-7.30pm SCD averaged 8.7m against YBF/Chase, this week in that time period SCD averaged 8.2m against Chase - so down 0.5m week on week for that time period. Some of that will be because the Chase is slightly tougher competition than half hour of YBF.

Between 7.30-8pm, SCD averaged 9.9m last week against Celebrity Chase. This week between 7.30-8pm, SCD averaged 9.1m against XFactor. So 0.8m down from last week, clearly the earlier TXF overlap hurt it for that half hour. This period was the one SCD was down the most week on week, Itv did good damage to SCD in this half hour by shifting XF earlier.

Between 8-8.30pm, SCD averaged 8.9m last week against XF. This week between 8-8.30pm, SCD averaged 9.1m. This was the only half hour which was up week on week. Clearly, BBC putting all the best contestants late on, helped boost the final half hour of SCD compared to last week's episode.
Fudd
12-10-2014
Regarding Doctor Who, it looks like the episode was steady at 4.9m; the 5.1m possibly takes in a bit of Strictly, which didn't finish until 20.36.
ronant
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by guestofseth:
“Will be interesting to see how the hour without the clash rated compared to last week, I'm betting it was around the same, indicating Strictly being down was everything to do with the clash and nothing to do with the quality.

Strictly was always going to be down, every week we see it starts of relatively low and rises so when you stop that rise prematurely the overall rating will be down.”

First hour of Strictly last week - 8.19m (42.1%)
First hour of Strictly this week - 8.22m (40.7%)
guestofseth
12-10-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“I have always said clashes affect both programs but necessarily equally.”

Most people have, what Andy is forgetting is that Samuel does not equal the entire thread.

Originally Posted by pjh8:
“So the clash didn't hurt Strictly as it had it's highest ratings while XF was on so no excuse for Strictly's drop..”

Without the clash the rating would have continued to rise throughout the show, with it it just kept hold of the audience it had. That's what caused the drop.
<<
<
62 of 792
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map