|
||||||||
Three - disappointing initial tests |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
Quote:
2Mbps on 4G? That is bad.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,876
|
wavejock is gonna have a field day in this thread...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
Quote:
wavejock is gonna have a field day in this thread...
if he is then i'll be telling him that O2 is just as bad in the city, and O2 coverage is piss poor elsewhere. |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,547
|
OP is this in a phone, or another device? it it tethering? have you tested a couple of different speedtest servers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
Quote:
OP is this in a phone, or another device? it it tethering? have you tested a couple of different speedtest servers?
i said i was in sauchiehall street in glasgow at the time. 3 tests done using 2 different servers. |
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,547
|
Quote:
screenshots clearly show it's a phone.
i said i was in sauchiehall street in glasgow at the time. 3 tests done using 2 different servers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
Quote:
Ah ok, that is a shame. I guess it's worth testing for a little longer just in case, but maybe EE is an option for you? more money but their 4G is in a much later rollout phase due to bigger investment in 4G and starting earlier.
we use them for our mobile devices at work and their 3G/HSPA data network isn't all that great considering they claim to have the biggest network. only reason i'm still with O2 is that i'm still on an old legacy unlimited data package at £12pm (with discounts). as a Three sim only deal would be a similar cost also with unlimited data then they are the only network i would consider moving to. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,759
|
Quote:
EE - over priced, crap monthly limits, wouldn't touch them with a barge pole.
we use them for our mobile devices at work and their 3G/HSPA data network isn't all that great considering they claim to have the biggest network. only reason i'm still with O2 is that i'm still on an old legacy unlimited data package at £12pm (with discounts). as a Three sim only deal would be a similar cost also with unlimited data then they are the only network i would consider moving to. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
Quote:
Do you get 4G on that o2 deal?
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 561
|
My location
Download Speeds Three UK - 20-30meg EE - 10-25meg O2 - 4meg Vodafone - 0.03meg |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
Quote:
My location
Download Speeds Three UK - 20-30meg EE - 10-25meg O2 - 4meg Vodafone - 0.03meg |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 561
|
Quote:
that's very nice for you, however your location is not really relevant to me.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,014
|
Almost 25Mbps at Heathrow Terminal 2 today (airside). There must be cells within the airport for this. Surprisingly no 4G though.
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
Quote:
Speeds vary upon location but it'll contribute to the way you overall see the networks.
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
Quote:
Almost 25Mbps at Heathrow Terminal 2 today (airside). There must be cells within the airport for this. Surprisingly no 4G though.
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 561
|
Quote:
with 25Mbps who needs 4G!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,759
|
Quote:
no, as any change to my O2 account would result in me loading my legacy unlimited data package. 4G didn't exists when i took that package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Wales
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
no, as any change to my O2 account would result in me loading my legacy unlimited data package. 4G didn't exists when i took that package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
Quote:
You might be able to add the 4G access bolt-on for £5 a month though. This would not change the tariff or the discounts. Just a thought in case you're interested.
i'm specifically testing Three to see how their network coverage compares to O2. that fact that 4G is included as standard with Three is an added bonus. |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,014
|
Quote:
with 25Mbps who needs 4G!
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 546
|
Quote:
Hillsborough is in the middle of a "strong" 4g area on Three but i have never seen it either in the stadium or in the wide open space that is the Wednesdayite car park.
The maps a bit of an arse i think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: S6 1SW WTID UTO FTB
Posts: 6,327
|
Quote:
I remember tweeting with delight from Hillsborough on a 4G connection when Simon Church buried that header for us, stopping you from having your Sheffield derby!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Ayrshire
Posts: 11,397
|
do Three and O2 share masts?
Three have a 4G are down here in Ayrshire, and suspiciously O2 also have the same 4G area (according to their coverage maps anyway). |
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,412
|
It is nuts that this sort of problem exists in the first place. IMO this nonsense about company A not having reception in Town B and company B not having reception in town A is a glaring example of one of the basic flaws of capitalism, namely a tendency to unnecessary duplication. It's one thing when a society's resources are used to produce a hundred different floor cleaners all doing exactly the same thing, but when it comes to something that is rapidly becoming a near-essential, like the mobile phone network, it's quite another.
Many people who are hardly dyed-in-the-wool Marxists are fiercely critical of Rail privatisation as a service that is not best served by a naked free-market approach, yet even there nobody would suggest that each Train Operating Company build there own rail network connecting the same cities. In these days of uber neo-liberal orthodoxy, I fully expect to get flamed to death, but in my idea of a sane world the mobile network would be a public one, or at least a national private one like BT's, with companies providing the services all using the same network and competing on price as well as other benefits and services and not simply reception. (And on that note imagine if the landline industry had always been privately owned and had evolved in the same way as the mobile industry, with each operator having it's own individual cabling which duplicated that of its rivals). That would at least produce a more sensible market for those who get off on that sort of thing - consumers wouldn't be forced to stick with a company they hated simply because nobody else could give them a signal in the Back of Beyond. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:37.



