• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Seriously, how sleazy is Dexter?
<<
<
1 of 4
>>
>
PorkchopExpress
17-10-2014
He's really uncomfortable to watch. Just awful.
trevor tiger
17-10-2014
Dexter sleazy I thought Nancy went to find him and wasn't it Nancy that suggested getting comfortable in the back seat of the car in the garage Sorry Dexter is not the sleazy one here.
soap-lea
17-10-2014
they both wanna get it on innit

think that was more nancy than dexter tho
masterquan
17-10-2014
Really. Really. Seriously this place needs cleaning up and threads like this reported. A young guy getting busy with a cute girl who likes him back. What a disgusting person he is
londongirlGre
17-10-2014
Dexter did nothing sleazy. They are both into each other.
PorkchopExpress
17-10-2014
I mean generally.
soap-lea
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by PorkchopExpress:
“I mean generally.”

oh just another Dexter hate thread then
trevor tiger
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by PorkchopExpress:
“I mean generally.”

How He seems perfectly normal to me.
londongirlGre
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“oh just another Dexter hate thread then”

Yep. I don't understand what is so bad about Dexter. He acts just like a normal London boy.
QueenAmy
17-10-2014
His axing is coming up, surely
sorcha_healy27
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by masterquan:
“Really. Really. Seriously this place needs cleaning up and threads like this reported. A young guy getting busy with a cute girl who likes him back. What a disgusting person he is”

this is exactly why this forum has gone downhill. reporting threads like this is just utterly absurd. do you believe in censorship too?
trevor tiger
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by QueenAmy:
“His axing is coming up, surely”

Far from it now he's snared the darling of the show
Keyser_Soze1
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“this us exactly why this forum has gone downhill. reporting threads like this is just utterly absurd”

Well said Sorcha.

All the fun is being drained out of it recently and I am sure I am not the only one to notice.

The lovely Priscilla has gone for example - she was one of my favourite posters that you could really have a laugh with.
sorcha_healy27
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by Keyser_Soze1:
“Well said Sorcha.

All the fun is being drained out of it recently and I am sure I am not the only one to notice.

The lovely Priscilla has gone for example - she was one of my favourite posters that you could really have a laugh with.”

it really is a shadow of what it used to be.
trevor tiger
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“this is exactly why this forum has gone downhill. reporting threads like this is just utterly absurd. do you believe in censorship too?”

Why People can report what they like and I'm sure they do but I would only agree with your point about censorship if the moderators actually acted on a report like this. I'm quite sure they wouldn't.
Aurora13
17-10-2014
I'm not sure sleazy is the right word but Dexter as a character is so one dimensional and irritates me when he comes on the screen. He should have left with his mother but sadly DTC/BBC would have been slated for lack of ethnic minority characters so we are stuck with Dexter for timebeing. Same with Fat Boy he is left high and dry without Poppy.
sorcha_healy27
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by trevor tiger:
“Why People can report what they like and I'm sure they do but I would only agree with your point about censorship if the moderators actually acted on a report like this. I'm quite sure they wouldn't.”

people reporting threads because they think the subject matter is not their opinion is completely different to reporting an offensive thread. Regardless of whether the mods act on it or not is not the point imo. anyone who cries alert the mod at the slightest thing is one of the reasons many long serving and great fms have left.
trevor tiger
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“people reporting threads because they think the subject matter is not their opinion is completely different to reporting an offensive thread. Regardless of whether the mods act on it or not is not the point imo. anyone who cries alert the mod at the slightest thing is one of the reasons many long serving and great fms have left.”

I just don't see how you can police individuals. The alert button is there and posters use it. My point is that surely moderators only act on the report if there is a beak of the rules so I don't see what the problem is

Why would members leave because others alert posts I'm sorry if I'm being thick but I just don;t understand why that would bother you. I mean normally you wouldn't even know would you

ETA In fact I believe abusing the alert system is against the rules as well as telling posters that you are going to alert
soap-lea
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by Aurora13:
“I'm not sure sleazy is the right word but Dexter as a character is so one dimensional and irritates me when he comes on the screen. He should have left with his mother but sadly DTC/BBC would have been slated for lack of ethnic minority characters so we are stuck with Dexter for timebeing. Same with Fat Boy he is left high and dry without Poppy.”

that is very dismissive of dexter, the actor who plays him and DTC and the BBC. I am very sure hik being part of the cast has nothing whatsoever to do with the colour of his skin. nor will he be kept in the show to fill a quota.
sorcha_healy27
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by trevor tiger:
“I just don't see how you can police individuals. The alert button is there and posters use it. My point is that surely moderators only act on the report if there is a beak of the rules so I don't see what the problem is

Why would members leave because others alert posts I'm sorry if I'm being thick but I just don;t understand why that would bother you. I mean normally you wouldn't even know would you ”

mo mouse and uncle q were banned because people didn't like their humour. that's what I mean. they were never rude or abusive but people complained about their posts.
J-B
17-10-2014
I don't think he was particularly sleazy tonight (he has been in the past, however) - he's just as dull as dishwater with half the personality.
RingoJ739K
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“mo mouse and uncle q were banned because people didn't like their humour. that's what I mean. they were never rude or abusive but people complained about their posts.”

I noticed a similar thing happening with Jasper last night in the Hollyoaks thread. He's currently banned. Not sure if it's permanent though.
trevor tiger
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“mo mouse and uncle q were banned because people didn't like their humour. that's what I mean. they were never rude or abusive but people complained about their posts.”

Mo Mouse was a hoot and never rude I agree. I really miss his posting here but we don't really know why he was banned so it's hard to discuss. Isn't UQ's ban over now?

I just feel that posters crying report shouldn't put other posters off. That would mean we were censoring ourselves.
SpiderMan 83
17-10-2014
Originally Posted by trevor tiger:
“Dexter sleazy I thought Nancy went to find him and wasn't it Nancy that suggested getting comfortable in the back seat of the car in the garage Sorry Dexter is not the sleazy one here.”

Dexter will always be blamed. Nancy could put her vag in his face and it still be Dextet who is to blame. Pathetic really.
cezzy
17-10-2014
I'm not a Dexter fan,but the amount of hate he gets on here is ridiculous! The scene was vomit inducing, not a Dexter-led-full-on-sleazy scene.
<<
<
1 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map