|
||||||||
Camerawork better this week. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 497
|
Camerawork better this week.
Still not perfect, but better. Do you think someone has had a word with them - at last?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,520
|
Quote:
Still not perfect, but better. Do you think someone has had a word with them - at last?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,038
|
Quote:
I thought that too, Wonder if they ever look at the DS forum.
......or maybe they've just cut down on the caffeine!! Usually, the camera work can appear a bit wired! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,736
|
Heaps better.
The only problem I saw in the whole show was down to an outsize fairground horsey in the way
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,029
|
Quote:
Heaps better.
The only problem I saw in the whole show was down to an outsize fairground horsey in the wayAnd agreed- it was better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 114 Gorgie Road Edinburgh EH11
Posts: 2,744
|
It was better. More focus on the dancers feet which is important. Much better!
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
|
Yes, I thought it was much better, more longer single shots showing dancing which is what it's all about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 718
|
I've not had a problem with the camerawork at all but it seemed different tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 17,127
|
I kind of wish we'd had a shot of Judy, after Anton chucked her down the floor like a bag of washing.
But that's just me being mean, I suppose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Planet Alan
Posts: 1,632
|
Definitely better, and, unless it was my imagination, the usual overpowering and irrelevant clapping was much less intrusive. Possible to hear the musicians for one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,187
|
Camera work was far better only one incident at the start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 242
|
A definite improvement but they still insist on doing the dizzying shot where they follow the dancers when they turn or spin which quite frankly makes me feel rather queezy.
So if anyone from the production team is checking in on DS please can you stop the spinning, thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,710
|
I didn't notice. But that in itself is high praise as the cameraman's work should never be noticed at the time of viewing - perhaps only after analysis.
Still too much Whirling Dervish for me. If not on Acid then on a Double Espresso. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,439
|
Watching tonight with several family members, and we all agreed the camerawork was much better tonight. Far more time when you could see the whole dancer from head to toe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: in the Sun (ツ)
Posts: 11,230
|
You must be pulling our plonker
There was a potentially fascinating quickstep from wosserface Flack and we didnt get to see her feet for half of it. Then when Anton did his big showpiece lift they zoomed out from where Horace the spider was living on ceiling fitting 39b. Duh. ****tarded I call it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:14.


The only problem I saw in the whole show was down to an outsize fairground horsey in the way
