• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
What they didn't mention at the trial
hachiman
19-10-2014
Was when Peter blurted out that he and Tina were even at her funeral even though he was drunk.
lou_123
19-10-2014
The trial has been good, but some of the writing is SO poor! Tina died at half 8, on 28th May, yet it was pitch black?:/ and tbh there's no concrete evidence he did kill Tina...
J-B
19-10-2014
Originally Posted by lou_123:
“The trial has been good, but some of the writing is SO poor! Tina died at half 8, on 28th May, yet it was pitch black?:/ and tbh there's no concrete evidence he did kill Tina...”

Hard evidence is pointless when you have good old circumstance and rumour
lou_123
19-10-2014
Originally Posted by J-B:
“Hard evidence is pointless when you have good old circumstance and rumour ”

I suppose!
CriticFan
20-10-2014
That he's a bigamist?
Eastenderstreet
20-10-2014
their dna would have been all over each other especially when Tina scratched him, thats certainly evidence
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map