Originally Posted by Chris Davies:
“
I'm not sure why you're holding up Douglas Adams as an exemplar - his reputation as a writer for Doctor Who is largely based on one serial of which he was only co-writer and which was not based in on his own idea. He certainly didn't give his best ideas to the show.
”
Sorry, bit of a long response time on this one but I've not looked at the thread since I last posted.
I used Douglas Adams as an example simply as he is probably the most famous and respected (outside of the show) author to have written for it, My point wasn't that he 'gave his best work to the show', but that such a prestige writer only has material in the Doctor Who archives because he created it (just) before he established his reputation: ie. it was early work. Doctor Who managed to find a great writer at the
beginning of his career and has wonderful material like City of Death and the Pirate Planet (I'm aware not everyone would consider them wonderful but that quibble is beside the point) in its catalogue because of that. I think there is
everything to be said for new writers in favour of old hacks living on their reputation.
Originally Posted by Steven_P:
“So we have to have SM but personally I think he needs to stop for a while and get some new ideas, but as it's part of the the game.”
Listen was a pretty new idea wasn't it?
Originally Posted by Marcus_Smith:
“Im surprised nobody has mentioned Richard Curtis i would have him back writing for a couple of episodes.”
How many ideas does he have? He's not really a fantasy / Sci-Fi writer. Perhaps having ticked the Doctor Who box on hi CV he feels no desire to write another.I would be surprised if they hadn't approached him given how well received 'Vincent and the doctor' was, particularly as it seems to have been a favourite with the production team too.