Originally Posted by BuddyBontheNet:
“I agree wholeheartedly.
It is natural that the element of 'it's not like it used to be' kicks in, but this is more than that. In 2004 the BBC introduced a new idea for a show and it took off like a rocket. Then over the years the various producers have tried to make the show bigger and better. I'm definitely not against all of the changes, but in the process of change (gradual or not so gradual at times), the producers have mismanaged the heart of the show - watching a celebrity learning to dance with a pro partner.”
“I agree wholeheartedly.
It is natural that the element of 'it's not like it used to be' kicks in, but this is more than that. In 2004 the BBC introduced a new idea for a show and it took off like a rocket. Then over the years the various producers have tried to make the show bigger and better. I'm definitely not against all of the changes, but in the process of change (gradual or not so gradual at times), the producers have mismanaged the heart of the show - watching a celebrity learning to dance with a pro partner.”
To be fair, series one was really a companion programme to Sports Relief. It was never really expected to be anything other than a one off money raising phantasmagorical spread over a few weeks - but even then, it ploughed the furrow in dancing versus entertainment with Chris Parker in the final.
I think the way it took off took them by surprised hence the reason series two followed hot on the heels in the same year.
By series 3 the main 'storylines' were in place. All it needed for completeness was an 'it's harder for boys blokey bloke sportsman, never danced me, I'm from Yorkshire, I've had a journey (from all of week one to week two, but hey)' winner. Step forward Mr Gough.





before phone votes were worrying and all the Blue Peter pets were correctly named then the phone lines opened immediately after the eliminated celeb had done their last dance - so the sooner the phone lines opened the better.



