Originally Posted by who, me?:
“I agree, wonkey, that there is no legal problem here, which is why I titled it 'morals' - or ethics, perhaps. Implication is certainly 'passing off' - you can imply, through your packaging and branding and pricing, that goods are of high quality, when what's inside is dross. No overt lying took place, just a rather tawdry means of doing business.
Trollface, what you say is true. I am not a self-made millionaire. But do you mean, then, that self made millionaires dont employ people with the characteristics of honesty, trustworthiness and vision?”
Nothing tawdry about it at all. The concept of high end is totally vague and you could claim in on look, and primarily smell.
High is entirely in the eye of the beholder, and before you get it home and try it in the claim of the advertiser. In this case, it doesn't even matter what the consumer thinks when he has tried it - as you don't want to sell anymore next week. What its made of is irrelevant, if it has some other claim to quality. .All that you can't do is claim its made of Z, when its made of Y. All business people cut as many corners as they can - thats why there's little meat in super market meat pies .......and almost none in dog food.