|
||||||||
Bottom of the Leaderboard should be up for the dance off every week |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,299
|
Bottom of the Leaderboard should be up for the dance off every week
That way this farce voting wouldn't keep happening!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,187
|
Quote:
That way this farce voting wouldn't keep happening!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Stratford-Upon-Avon
Posts: 37,533
|
I wish people would get over this!
If you did that, you render the public vote entirely useless as A) the public wouldn't be getting much of say and B) it'd be the dullest result show ever as you'd know who was going simply by looking at who was ranked last. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: In Svalbard with Mr Bear
Posts: 6,253
|
That would make the show really boring and predictable and hand way too much power to the producers (who already have too much power anyway). The whole point of the show is viewer participation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 🖥⌨🖱
Posts: 29,243
|
The occasional shock exit is very positive for the show.
Obviously that's no consolation to the fans of the shock eliminee but I'm looking at it from a broader perspective. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,982
|
I don't think bottom of the leaderboard should be in the dance off but I think in the event if a judges tie it should go to viewer votes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 7,605
|
Quote:
That way this farce voting wouldn't keep happening!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,043
|
Quote:
I don't think bottom of the leaderboard should be in the dance off but I think in the event if a judges tie it should go to viewer votes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,710
|
Quote:
The occasional shock exit is very positive for the show.
Obviously that's no consolation to the fans of the shock eliminee but I'm looking at it from a broader perspective. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 1,388
|
Quote:
I don't think bottom of the leaderboard should be in the dance off but I think in the event if a judges tie it should go to viewer votes.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,710
|
Quote:
I don't think bottom of the leaderboard should be in the dance off but I think in the event if a judges tie it should go to viewer votes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,314
|
The bottom of the leaderboard *are* up for the dance off every week. Along with every other couple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 749
|
Quote:
I don't think bottom of the leaderboard should be in the dance off but I think in the event if a judges tie it should go to viewer votes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 24,531
|
Others are saying that the bottom two should at the very least do the same style of dance .I agree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,710
|
Quote:
I wish people would get over this!
If you did that, you render the public vote entirely useless as A) the public wouldn't be getting much of say and B) it'd be the dullest result show ever as you'd know who was going simply by looking at who was ranked last. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: In Svalbard with Mr Bear
Posts: 6,253
|
Plus a show that goes on involving the celebs the public least want to watch would be a way to kill off viewing figures. For whatever reason more people wanted to watch Scott, Judy, Alison, Sunetra and Steve this week than Simon and Thom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,710
|
Quote:
I wish people would get over this!
If you did that, you render the public vote entirely useless as A) the public wouldn't be getting much of say and B) it'd be the dullest result show ever as you'd know who was going simply by looking at who was ranked last. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
The public gets what the public wants. The show is not run for the benefit of the judges. The show is run for the benefit of the voting public.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 11,807
|
Why? The public should get the chance to save any and all of the couples, which is fair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,710
|
Quote:
The public gets what the public wants. The show is not run for the benefit of the judges. The show is run for the benefit of the voting public.
You'd get a better result of "what the public wants" by getting the public to rank all the contestants in order and then take an average. Just perhaps too cumbersome initially but feasible for the last 10 onwards. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kandy Kitchen
Posts: 37,693
|
If everyone who moans about the result actually voted it would probably be a different story.
Happens every year - yes Thom/ Simon weren't the worst of the night, gut obviously neither clicked with the public during their dances. I'd imagine Scott, Judy or Allison will be gone next week anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 495
|
Quote:
I wish people would get over this!
If you did that, you render the public vote entirely useless as A) the public wouldn't be getting much of say and B) it'd be the dullest result show ever as you'd know who was going simply by looking at who was ranked last. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,484
|
I would get rid of the vote and have the judges decide ...... just like Masterchef and Bake Off. It works perfectly well there.
They could have two votes each, technique and entertainment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,672
|
Quote:
I wish people would get over this!
If you did that, you render the public vote entirely useless as A) the public wouldn't be getting much of say and B) it'd be the dullest result show ever as you'd know who was going simply by looking at who was ranked last. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 691
|
Yes surely SCD is about contestants with no dancing background improving (and sometimes winning i.e. Gough & Hollins) as well as the ones who obviously have had dance experience before just about dancing everyone
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:14.



