|
||||||||
Well done Thom and Please STOP bashing Scott |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
Quote:
It's an entertainment show about celebrities learning to dance. I actually think the producers have too much power and the leaderboard shouldn't count towards the results and the dance-off should be scrapped. It would be more exciting if the whole thing was down to the public vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: in the Sun (ツ)
Posts: 11,219
|
What's Scot supposed to be working hard on, exactly? I could have a stab at doing his dances the way he does them in less than an hour.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 14
|
I agree that even though I loved Thom it isn't Scott's fault! People will vote for who they want to keep in, it doesn't matter what criteria they choose for that as it is their vote and they can do what they want with it. Thom didn't get the votes so he was in the bottom two along with Simon he wasn't as strong a dancer as Simon so the judges voted him to leave.
I don't feel like Scott is enjoying the experience much but he has a right to canvass for votes and to promote himself and as long as he's being voted in to stay then that is it. I've always loved the show for having a mixture of talented dancers, real beginners who improve every week and real no hopers. I'm sad when my favourites (whatever their talent is) leave but there is no point in blaming any other contestant or the people voting for them. One year I might like a OK contestant who goes too early, the next I could enjoy a bad one who I vote and help stay in over better dancers. I like that mix and Scott and the people voting for him aren't to blame for Thom not getting enough votes to stay in the competition. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 62
|
"'I agree that even though I loved Thom it isn't Scott's fault! People will vote for who they want to keep in, it doesn't matter what criteria they choose for that as it is their vote and they can do what they want with it. Thom didn't get the votes so he was in the bottom two along with Simon he wasn't as strong a dancer as Simon so the judges voted him to leave.
I don't feel like Scott is enjoying the experience much but he has a right to canvass for votes and to promote himself and as long as he's being voted in to stay then that is it. I've always loved the show for having a mixture of talented dancers, real beginners who improve every week and real no hopers. I'm sad when my favourites (whatever their talent is) leave but there is no point in blaming any other contestant or the people voting for them. One year I might like a OK contestant who goes too early, the next I could enjoy a bad one who I vote and help stay in over better dancers. I like that mix and Scott and the people voting for him aren't to blame for Thom not getting enough votes to stay in the competition." Awerka Precisely Last edited by ddmatt05 : 26-10-2014 at 22:44. Reason: Define quote |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
Well done Thom and Iveta on a fantastic serie
even though it was cut short today.At the end of the day, this show is mostly a popularity contest so I wished some people in this forum would stop vilifying Scott (Im starting to feel a bit sorry for the guy ![]() ; He is clearly working really hard and putting the hours in and that has to be commended IMO ) ; Its NOT his fault that the public likes him and vote for him every week..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Gorey, Co. Wexford, Ireland
Posts: 11,772
|
I dont vote. But I enjoy Scott more than some of the few remaining. But tbh, this forum sometimes make me want vote for him.
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,192
|
Well I am a fan of Scott's radio show & so is hubby! We are middle-aged, conservative, intelligent, professionals; & self-confessed snobs. We find him amusing & a good DJ. (So we are not from the 'yoof' demographic).
I never vote on these shows, (wouldn't waste my hard earned money; as imho the judges have too much clout) however I feel sorry for him, as he is trying so hard and is obviously out of his element, suffers from stage fright & has untreated talipes. I loathe Simon & I am not surprised he was in the bottom two again, he makes me cringe so much I fast forward all his bits; even when he is on ITT (as we Sky+ everything & watch it later; so we can cut the credits, boring stuff & adverts). I even expect Simon will be joining Scott & Judy again in the dance-off at some stage, (if he's not already out) as he is unpopular. However I don't expect him to give up because he is obviously not very likeable! I look on Strictly as an entertainment show & don't take the dance competition side of it seriously until the final. They tell us to vote for our favourite & if I was voting; it would be Luke as he's naturally brilliant & as far as my research has gone he's not a ringer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ripper Street
Posts: 630
|
STOP bashing Scott?
He's rubbish - can't dance, doesn't try and has zero personality. We'll get to the stage where very good dancers are leaving and this piece of uselessness continues - spoils the show. He's truly dire - worse than Judy and Alison and that's saying something. |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In my shell
Posts: 3,178
|
Quote:
They tell us to vote for our favourite & if I was voting; it would be Luke as he's naturally brilliant & as far as my research has gone he's not a ringer.
you've obviously researched him in depth!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Running up that hill
Posts: 8,256
|
Quote:
Well I am a fan of Scott's radio show & so is hubby! We are middle-aged, conservative, intelligent, professionals; & self-confessed snobs. We find him amusing & a good DJ. (So we are not from the 'yoof' demographic).
I never vote on these shows, (wouldn't waste my hard earned money; as imho the judges have too much clout) however I feel sorry for him, as he is trying so hard and is obviously out of his element, suffers from stage fright & has untreated talipes. I loathe Simon & I am not surprised he was in the bottom two again, he makes me cringe so much I fast forward all his bits; even when he is on ITT (as we Sky+ everything & watch it later; so we can cut the credits, boring stuff & adverts). I even expect Simon will be joining Scott & Judy again in the dance-off at some stage, (if he's not already out) as he is unpopular. However I don't expect him to give up because he is obviously not very likeable! I look on Strictly as an entertainment show & don't take the dance competition side of it seriously until the final. They tell us to vote for our favourite & if I was voting; it would be Luke as he's naturally brilliant & as far as my research has gone he's not a ringer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 114 Gorgie Road Edinburgh EH11
Posts: 2,744
|
Quote:
I dont vote. But I enjoy Scott more than some of the few remaining. But tbh, this forum sometimes make me want vote for him.
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,589
|
Quote:
STOP bashing Scott?
He's rubbish - can't dance, doesn't try and has zero personality. We'll get to the stage where very good dancers are leaving and this piece of uselessness continues - spoils the show. He's truly dire - worse than Judy and Alison and that's saying something. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,656
|
Quote:
To be honest I fail to see what's even likeable about him and I would have thought the majority of his "fans" would be watching X Factor anyway. If I were in his position, or Judy's, I'd be acutely embarrassed to the extent that it would be severely reducing my enjoyment of taking part. Still I suppose the money remains an attraction.
There is plenty to like about him depending on your opinion of what makes someone likeable. I can't see any appeal whatsoever in Judy, but others do... this is how these things work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,443
|
Quote:
It ebbs and flows on my 'anger meter' when rubbish stars stay in however let's be rational:
1. It's not a pro dance competition. 2. The celebs agree to take part, get booked, get a fee. 3. If the voting public spend their hard earned keeping you in, regardless of their reasons, is that the celebs fault? Not really. 4. If a celeb bows out early, how does that make viewers feel that have been spending their hard earned to keep them in? 5. Although there's a balance to be found, unexpected bottom twos etc creates debate between viewers i.e. the show gets talked about. 6. Although the production team can never call it 100%, in terms of dance ability they'll want a celeb mix of 'they're likely to be good', 'they're likely to be average', 'they're likely to be poor.' 7. It's ENTERTAINMENT ![]() Quote:
Well I am a fan of Scott's radio show & so is hubby! We are middle-aged, conservative, intelligent, professionals; & self-confessed snobs. We find him amusing & a good DJ. (So we are not from the 'yoof' demographic).
I never vote on these shows, (wouldn't waste my hard earned money; as imho the judges have too much clout) however I feel sorry for him, as he is trying so hard and is obviously out of his element, suffers from stage fright & has untreated talipes. I loathe Simon & I am not surprised he was in the bottom two again, he makes me cringe so much I fast forward all his bits; even when he is on ITT (as we Sky+ everything & watch it later; so we can cut the credits, boring stuff & adverts). I even expect Simon will be joining Scott & Judy again in the dance-off at some stage, (if he's not already out) as he is unpopular. However I don't expect him to give up because he is obviously not very likeable! I look on Strictly as an entertainment show & don't take the dance competition side of it seriously until the final. They tell us to vote for our favourite & if I was voting; it would be Luke as he's naturally brilliant & as far as my research has gone he's not a ringer. ![]() ![]() Quote:
As a total non Scott fan, I have to take issue with that. All the evidence suggests that he tries very hard and puts in the hours in the training room just as much as the others. Unfortunately, he just has no aptitude for dance whatsoever. Maybe if they had a month rather than a week to learn each dance he would fare a bit better but they don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,043
|
Luke for the win!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
I don't feel like Scott is enjoying the experience much but he has a right to canvass for votes and to promote himself and as long as he's being voted in to stay then that is it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,668
|
Quote:
All of the celebs canvass for votes. It's no particular fault of Scott's if the public want to see him next week instead of Thom or Simon.
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,192
|
Quote:
Do you mean Jake By any chances
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,443
|
Quote:
Ha ha yes I meant Jake; sorry was falling asleep & had a bit too much to drink last night!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Its okay lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
|
Quote:
Well I am a fan of Scott's radio show & so is hubby! We are middle-aged, conservative, intelligent, professionals; & self-confessed snobs. We find him amusing & a good DJ. (So we are not from the 'yoof' demographic).
I never vote on these shows, (wouldn't waste my hard earned money; as imho the judges have too much clout) however I feel sorry for him, as he is trying so hard and is obviously out of his element, suffers from stage fright & has untreated talipes. I loathe Simon & I am not surprised he was in the bottom two again, he makes me cringe so much I fast forward all his bits; even when he is on ITT (as we Sky+ everything & watch it later; so we can cut the credits, boring stuff & adverts). I even expect Simon will be joining Scott & Judy again in the dance-off at some stage, (if he's not already out) as he is unpopular. However I don't expect him to give up because he is obviously not very likeable! I look on Strictly as an entertainment show & don't take the dance competition side of it seriously until the final. They tell us to vote for our favourite & if I was voting; it would be Luke as he's naturally brilliant & as far as my research has gone he's not a ringer. Why the need to be snobby. Horrible trait in a person..IMO
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 239
|
Whilst I agree that Scott is not a dancer, I really don't know why he should be subjected to so much criticism. He seems pleasant enough, and takes the judges' comments on the chin. At least he doesn't answer back as Ann Widdecombe used to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,161
|
to put things into perspective when people compare him to Ann Widecome
1 he tries to dance, he does not dictate what the character of the dance should be ie he does not say he does not think Latin should be raunchy. 2 he practices, Ann said she and Anton put in a couple of hours a day, where as Scott and Joanne, practice for hours each day. 3 he stands there and accepts critism, he does not interrupt the judges with pre scripted " witticisms " that were never witty or remotely funny. 4 he accepts being dressed in the costumes the BBC dictate, and does not lay down rules for what he will and will not wear, leading to leggings under costumes so he does not compromise his dignity. I never found Ann remotely funny, I also don't find Scott on SCD funny and he really cannot dance. However he tries and is willing . Anne was not, she wanted to dictate everything on her terms and really did not try to learn to dance. I think there is a re writing of SCD history here when people are lumping Scott in with Ann and saying at least she was funny. To an awful lot of people there was nothing funny about her at all. . Least we forget Ann saw off Jimi Mistri, Patsy Kensit, Felicity Kendal, Tina O' Brien and Michelle Williams who were all without a doubt much better dancers than her. So far the only person demonstrably better than him who has gone before Scott is Thom. I don't find Scott entertaining or claim he can dance on SCD, I still like him a lot on his radio show in his comfort zone. Ultimately I think we all, and I include Scott in this think he would be happier if he left. Of course he is canvassing for votes, his job depends on him being popular, it doesn't mean he has to want to be there though. Most importantly of all I think to lump him in with Ann Widdecombe would be so personally hurtful to him as she is a famously homophobic biggot where as he is an openly gay man, who has confounded the producers and some viewers with not being camp. I have to say I do wonder whether some of the animosity towards him is because he has had the audacity to not be the camp gay person. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,120
|
Quote:
What's Scot supposed to be working hard on, exactly? I could have a stab at doing his dances the way he does them in less than an hour.
I don't think it is Scott's fault, but he does plug himself on his radio show quite a bit (I actually listened to his show for a couple of days). I really think this should stop. Although it does happen when a good dancer goes before a bad one, Scott is probably the worst dancer since Christopher in series 1. I am really hoping this is Scott's last week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,043
|
Normally people will vote for the "joke" contestant until the first Shock Boot. Or conversely, those who haven't bothered voting before, will do so after the Shock boot.
Will be interesting to see what happens this weekend |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: in the Sun (ツ)
Posts: 11,219
|
Well, the wobbly ship Scott is certainly enlightening. Thom was supposed to be the poster-boy hunk model but didn't have his own platform to canvass for votes, and now he's gone. And we have this basically uncoordinated guy who it's not even clear is enjoying it after all this humiliation, trying to stay in at others' expense. Weird.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:35.




even though it was cut short today.

you've obviously researched him in depth!
Why the need to be snobby. Horrible trait in a person..IMO