He looks more and more embarrassed each week
Should Scott do "a Sargeant?"
1 of 3
Originally Posted by firefly_irl:
“Nope this is democracy in action, and I'm not a Scott fan.”
“Nope this is democracy in action, and I'm not a Scott fan.”
Agreed
I don't think he should walk but I hope he's voted off sooner rather than later, it's unfair on the likes of Thom, Simon, etc...
No, people are voting for him so he's entitled to stay until and unless he ends up in the bottom two. Them's the rules, same as every year when we have the same discussion.
Q: Should Scott do "a Sargeant?"
A: No. Lovely Thom did his best but did not get enough public votes. Not Scott's fault.
A: No. Lovely Thom did his best but did not get enough public votes. Not Scott's fault.
Nope, Sergeant should never have stepped down imho, it was unfair to people who were voting for him. Plus I doubt very much he would have won.
Originally Posted by lightonmyfeet:
“Q: Should Scott do "a Sargeant?"
A: No. Lovely Thom did his best but did not get enough public votes. Not Scott's fault.”
“Q: Should Scott do "a Sargeant?"
A: No. Lovely Thom did his best but did not get enough public votes. Not Scott's fault.”
Agreed.
Gutted about Thom, though.
Oh for gods sake if some fans are voting for Scott more than others why should he leave? Some people need to stop moaning because they are not getting their own way. Thom and Simon did not get many votes and were placed into the bottom two despite having three other contestants below them on the leaderboard. Why should those who the public are not voting for get to stay?
Definitely agree the answer is NO and JS shouldn't have left either. Probably the show's lowest moment.
Originally Posted by BuddyBontheNet:
“Definitely agree the answer is NO and JS shouldn't have left either. Probably the show's lowest moment.”
“Definitely agree the answer is NO and JS shouldn't have left either. Probably the show's lowest moment.”
True but made for one of the funniest press conferences I have ever seen.
We can go four more weeks without worry but then if Scott and Judy are both still left then there's a problem. If they both drop out at the same time it would be odd, but if they both continue then it harms the credibility of the show (as a dancing competition).
Maybe they can just go on holiday like Esther Rantzen?
Maybe they can just go on holiday like Esther Rantzen?
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“True but made for one of the funniest press conferences I have ever seen.”
“True but made for one of the funniest press conferences I have ever seen.
”
So wish I could agree.
Originally Posted by knawtitypaos:
“He looks more and more embarrassed each week”
“He looks more and more embarrassed each week”
You mean, should he get a contract with a cruise company to do speaking engagements half way through the series? I'm sure it would pay well.
Scott (or indeed Judy/ Allison) haven't knocked out a good dancer yet. Thom was ok, but he was never going to win let's be honest.
The crap always goes out in the end - look at how long Dave stayed and Anne and all the others.
Their time will come
The crap always goes out in the end - look at how long Dave stayed and Anne and all the others.
Their time will come
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“True but made for one of the funniest press conferences I have ever seen.”
“True but made for one of the funniest press conferences I have ever seen.
”
I recall when he was allowed back on the show to do a farewell dance, the four judges sat there stony faced - if looks could kill!
Originally Posted by zelda fan:
“Oh for gods sake if some fans are voting for Scott more than others why should he leave? Some people need to stop moaning because they are not getting their own way. Thom and Simon did not get many votes and were placed into the bottom two despite having three other contestants below them on the leaderboard. Why should those who the public are not voting for get to stay?”
“Oh for gods sake if some fans are voting for Scott more than others why should he leave? Some people need to stop moaning because they are not getting their own way. Thom and Simon did not get many votes and were placed into the bottom two despite having three other contestants below them on the leaderboard. Why should those who the public are not voting for get to stay?”
Exactly! There is no specified order for departure - if it were according to the judges' leader board then why bother with a public vote. The public vote does as it says, and if the dancers that everyone misses so much after they have gone got more votes, then they would still be here.
Originally Posted by yohinnchild:
“Scott (or indeed Judy/ Allison) haven't knocked out a good dancer yet. Thom was ok, but he was never going to win let's be honest.
The crap always goes out in the end - look at how long Dave stayed and Anne and all the others.
Their time will come”
“Scott (or indeed Judy/ Allison) haven't knocked out a good dancer yet. Thom was ok, but he was never going to win let's be honest.
The crap always goes out in the end - look at how long Dave stayed and Anne and all the others.
Their time will come”
More wise words. It is reassuring to see that the predicted meltdown on here has not been as bad as I had feared.
Originally Posted by davegold:
“We can go four more weeks without worry but then if Scott and Judy are both still left then there's a problem. If they both drop out at the same time it would be odd, but if they both continue then it harms the credibility of the show (as a dancing competition).
Maybe they can just go on holiday like Esther Rantzen?”
“We can go four more weeks without worry but then if Scott and Judy are both still left then there's a problem. If they both drop out at the same time it would be odd, but if they both continue then it harms the credibility of the show (as a dancing competition).
Maybe they can just go on holiday like Esther Rantzen?”
It has never been a proper dance competition, otherwise last series they would have handed Natalie the trophy in week 1 and be done with it. It's who entertains the public. Chris Parker made to the final in series 1.
Originally Posted by davegold:
“We can go four more weeks without worry but then if Scott and Judy are both still left then there's a problem. If they both drop out at the same time it would be odd, but if they both continue then it harms the credibility of the show (as a dancing competition).
Maybe they can just go on holiday like Esther Rantzen?”
“We can go four more weeks without worry but then if Scott and Judy are both still left then there's a problem. If they both drop out at the same time it would be odd, but if they both continue then it harms the credibility of the show (as a dancing competition).
Maybe they can just go on holiday like Esther Rantzen?”
It's not a dancing competition. It's a light entertainment show based on the premise of celebrities learning to dance with an elimination element based on public vote. Chris Parker set the tone back in Series 1. It has no "credibility" as a dancing competition beyond the people who persist in treating it as a serious dancing competition, which it never has been.
Originally Posted by DeltaBlues:
“It's not a dancing competition. It's a light entertainment show based on the premise of celebrities learning to dance with an elimination element based on public vote. Chris Parker set the tone back in Series 1. It has no "credibility" as a dancing competition beyond the people who persist in treating it as a serious dancing competition, which it never has been.”
“It's not a dancing competition. It's a light entertainment show based on the premise of celebrities learning to dance with an elimination element based on public vote. Chris Parker set the tone back in Series 1. It has no "credibility" as a dancing competition beyond the people who persist in treating it as a serious dancing competition, which it never has been.”
you arre right something I had to learn to do was chill out over the dancing and just accept it for what it is
Originally Posted by davegold:
“We can go four more weeks without worry but then if Scott and Judy are both still left then there's a problem. If they both drop out at the same time it would be odd, but if they both continue then it harms the credibility of the show (as a dancing competition).
Maybe they can just go on holiday like Esther Rantzen?”
“We can go four more weeks without worry but then if Scott and Judy are both still left then there's a problem. If they both drop out at the same time it would be odd, but if they both continue then it harms the credibility of the show (as a dancing competition).
Maybe they can just go on holiday like Esther Rantzen?”
How so?
Besides, didn't Scott already do a JS last night (dragging Joanne around the floor).
1 of 3
