• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Music on Strictly
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
F&CStrictlyBlog
01-11-2014
Originally Posted by strictlyflick:
“ while I appreciate that if chosen carefully popular songs can work well I do think traditional music is usually more appropriate for most dances. Especially for dances like the paso doble and the samba.”

Hear, hear!

F&C
http://frankieandcloverstrictly.blogspot.co.uk/
VintageWhine
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“Well done the band!
They did an excellent job on some very unmusical songs, considering how little rehearsal time they get.
It amazes me why people on here criticise "live" performances of so many different genres of music...”

Finally the voice of reason.
pinkwafer
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by carriebebe:
“i am gutted that my fave song from wicked the musical was absolutely murdered tonight ”

No way! Hayley did great with that. It's a difficult song.
Starpuss
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by mourinhosmissus:
“The singer who screeched her way through Wuthering Heights tonight was the worst I'd ever heard on Strictly.”

It's one of my favourite songs and I was dreading it but I thought it was ok.

Danger! High Voltage on the other hand was dire. It's too quirky a song to be done by anyone one else other than Electric Six. That and the awful dress poor Pixie was wearing distracted me from the actual dance.
dander
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“
I really wish some of those who criticise the band realised how unnecessarily difficult the producer makes Dave Arch and the singers' jobs, just because they're chasing the X-Factor audience and so pick so many unsuitable tunes.
It's such a relief the times they've obviously cocked it up and chosen a decent one..”

I realise you are probably a lovely person and I do applaud your niceness in sticking up for the band but I guess I'm not as nice because I don't see why I should have to make allowances for professional musicians on a very high profile gig.

Ultimately though I definitely agree that the blame lies at the producer's door - the producer shouldn't be happy about the way the music sounds and should do what needs to be done to make it sound great - whether that means different musicians, more rehearsals, different music choices is the producer's job to work out and put in place.
Vientre
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by mourinhosmissus:
“The singer who screeched her way through Wuthering Heights tonight was the worst I'd ever heard on Strictly.”

And up there murdering songs was the bloke who tried to sing Poison.
Doghouse Riley
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by dander:
“I realise you are probably a lovely person and I do applaud your niceness in sticking up for the band but I guess I'm not as nice because I don't see why I should have to make allowances for professional musicians on a very high profile gig.

Ultimately though I definitely agree that the blame lies at the producer's door - the producer shouldn't be happy about the way the music sounds and should do what needs to be done to make it sound great - whether that means different musicians, more rehearsals, different music choices is the producer's job to work out and put in place.”

Sorry, it's not a case of "sticking up" for anyone. I'm not really being "a lovely person," I'm just expressing the little bit of basic musical knowledge I've gathered over the years, that many on here show that they similarly possess.

Some of the recordings you hear on CD's, can take months to record, every one of them can have the benefit of multi-tracking, editing, numerous takes, over-dubbing, some even have a bit of post-recording "key changing" for notes that are difficult for artists to reach.
It's going back a bit but, here's a classic example. It was clearly evident that Susannah Hoffs of the Bangles struggled if she attempted it "live" to make the full octave step in the last chorus of "Eternal Flame," she "managed" on the recording. She often sang it a sixth lower.

You're into the world of "make believe" in a recording studio.

And you want a live band to be able to replicate those sort of performances after a few run-throughs, of how many tunes?

I'm amazed how well they cope with the stupid and unreasonable demands of a ratings chasing numpty producer.
dander
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“
And you want a live band to be able to replicate those sort of performances after a few run-throughs, of how many tunes?

I”

No, that's not what I want. What I want is music that sounds good.

I'd rather they did away with the live band altogether and just played the cds if they are going to insist on doing every dance to pop hits. IF they are going to insist on a live band then they need to give them music to play that they can make sound good.

What we're getting at the moment is a mess.
fatskia
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“Sorry, it's not a case of "sticking up" for anyone. I'm not really being "a lovely person," I'm just expressing the little bit of basic musical knowledge I've gathered over the years, that many on here show that they similarly possess.

Some of the recordings you hear on CD's, can take months to record, every one of them can have the benefit of multi-tracking, editing, numerous takes, over-dubbing, some even have a bit of post-recording "key changing" for notes that are difficult for artists to reach.
It's going back a bit but, here's a classic example. It was clearly evident that Susannah Hoffs of the Bangles struggled if she attempted it "live" to make the full octave step in the last chorus of "Eternal Flame," she "managed" on the recording. She often sang it a sixth lower.

You're into the world of "make believe" in a recording studio.

And you want a live band to be able to replicate those sort of performances after a few run-throughs, of how many tunes?

I'm amazed how well they cope with the stupid and unreasonable demands of a ratings chasing numpty producer.”

Too right!

Compare live performances by the original artists with the Strictly band and the band seem pretty good.
Dancing Girl
02-11-2014
Thought the music and singing for Frankie's dance routine was just dreadful. How on earth did they dance a tango to that!!
F&CStrictlyBlog
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by Dancing Girl:
“Thought the music and singing for Frankie's dance routine was just dreadful. How on earth did they dance a tango to that!!”

Completely inappropriate for tango - wrong time-signature and being a narrative-focussed song, there were too many changes of tempo for it to work. Given the circumstances, both Kevin and Frankie - and indeed the band - did a remarkable job with it. There needs to be less focus on production and more on music.

F&C
frankieandcloverstrictly.blogspot.co.uk
goldberry1
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by dander:
“No, that's not what I want. What I want is music that sounds good.

I'd rather they did away with the live band altogether and just played the cds if they are going to insist on doing every dance to pop hits. IF they are going to insist on a live band then they need to give them music to play that they can make sound good.

What we're getting at the moment is a mess.”

Yes, this.
DeltaBlues
02-11-2014
The producer who chooses the music hates dance and wants it to die..

Dave Arch and the singers are the paramedics performing CPR in difficult circumstances. Sometimes they get lucky and the patient lives.
Doghouse Riley
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by DeltaBlues:
“The producer who chooses the music hates dance and wants it to die..

Dave Arch and the singers are the paramedics performing CPR in difficult circumstances. Sometimes they get lucky and the patient lives.”

Sometimes, with naff contemporary pop tunes, "resurrection" is required and even that is beyond the band's capability.

Originally Posted by dander:
“No, that's not what I want. What I want is music that sounds good.”

What you want and that numpty producer wants are poles apart.

You're "preaching to the converted."

How many times do we have to say we want "proper" ballroom tunes, from whatever era?
We don't need "pop songs." They're for X-Factor, this is a dance/entertainment programme.
henrywilliams58
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by Doghouse Riley:
“Sorry, it's not a case of "sticking up" for anyone. I'm not really being "a lovely person," I'm just expressing the little bit of basic musical knowledge I've gathered over the years, that many on here show that they similarly possess.

Some of the recordings you hear on CD's, can take months to record, every one of them can have the benefit of multi-tracking, editing, numerous takes, over-dubbing, some even have a bit of post-recording "key changing" for notes that are difficult for artists to reach.
It's going back a bit but, here's a classic example. It was clearly evident that Susannah Hoffs of the Bangles struggled if she attempted it "live" to make the full octave step in the last chorus of "Eternal Flame," she "managed" on the recording. She often sang it a sixth lower.

You're into the world of "make believe" in a recording studio.

And you want a live band to be able to replicate those sort of performances after a few run-throughs, of how many tunes?

I'm amazed how well they cope with the stupid and unreasonable demands of a ratings chasing numpty producer.”

Totally agree. there are very few "musicians" on the show who sing as well as the SCD in house band. They are singing live without any processing.
Starpuss
02-11-2014
I think less people listen to music live now. Or if they do it's at a concert where there are loads of sound effects etc.

Proper live music in a more intimate setting is very different
olivej
02-11-2014
I think Hayley did an incredible job with Wuthering Heights, Kate Bush has such a unique voice that anyone else who sings it is never going to sound "right" for want of a better word, for an incredibly difficult, iconic song, Hayley, in my opinion, pulled it off - well done to her

The band and singers do an incredible, sometimes not easy job, every single week - live!

they hardly ever get any thanks or recognition, the only one who is called by his name is Dave Arch

I think every single one of them is amazing - I couldn't do it, I think they deserve ALOT more praise and credit than they are given
Doghouse Riley
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by olivej:
“I think Hayley did an incredible job with Wuthering Heights, Kate Bush has such a unique voice that anyone else who sings it is never going to sound "right" for want of a better word, for an incredibly difficult, iconic song, Hayley, in my opinion, pulled it off - well done to her

The band and singers do an incredible, sometimes not easy job, every single week - live!

they hardly ever get any thanks or recognition, the only one who is called by his name is Dave Arch

I think every single one of them is amazing - I couldn't do it, I think they deserve ALOT more praise and credit than they are given”

Exactly!

I said on here, when I read that "Wuthering Heights" had been chosen that it would present difficulties as Kate Bush had a voice range of four octaves. Hayley did very well in the circumstances.

I also suggested, having seen the Kate Bush video a few times, I expected there to be a lot of "faffin about" at the beginning.

I was right, Alison's entrance reminded me of a white van being delivered on vehicle transporter. She looked ridiculous.
ESPIONdansant
02-11-2014
'Wuthering' was brilliantly done.

It's not the way they're performed that's the problem. It's the bizarre song-selection. Poor Dave Arch. Poor dancers.
alan29
02-11-2014
What we are getting is high quality live performances of songs.
Some songs survive live performances by non-original audiences because they are basically well written songs that stand up on their own feet.
Other songs rely so heavily on the performer or studio technicians to cover their defects that any sort of live performance just shows up their defects. That is what is people are noticing here, I think. Their favourite songs are just dependant on a particular recording.
The big problem for the producers of Strictly is that the styles of music associated with the dances tends to be the standard classic songs that are brilliantly written and don't need special pkeading by a particular singer etc .... they are just excellent songs. But the producers are determined to use more popular tunes that struggle to stand on their own two feet as pieces of music.
TWS
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by pinkwafer:
“No way! Hayley did great with that. It's a difficult song.”

You seriously think defying gravity was sung well, guess you have never heard it sung properly then
alan_tracy
02-11-2014
The music choice is also self limited by trying to avoid repeats. The number of songs that are a) recognisable to audiences b) suitable for conversion to dance and c) have not already been used is not great.
Jen_Piper
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by goldberry1:
“In my opiion - the music on Strictly isn't very good - is there any reason not to have the original music played whilst the dancers perform - Expensive? Copyright?

Tonight I was looking forward to Hallowe'en Strictly - it was spoilt by the music (and some bad performances).”


You mean you want to hear auto-tune and recorded lyrics?

It's LIVE, dahling. This is what music should sound like. Granted, the songs don't always suit the singer's voice, but that's because they're covering a chosen song not that it suits them.

One of the reasons I love Strictly is the chance to hear a live band and live vocal on television. It's a rare occurrence these days.
Smooth84
02-11-2014
I like the idea of a live band and I think the studio version of the song playing might feel a bit flat in compassion. If the song is unsuitable for a live band then it would be preferable I suppose.

I think generally speaking the band do a good job. There is one of the female singers who I'm not keen on - she has a very nasal quality to her voice which isn't to my taste, but they tend to dish out the main singing duties to whichever singer is most capable of replicating the original artist.

On the subject of music I really think more should be done to incorporate appropriate music for the dance. Several dances lost their character - the Tango should be passionate and intense. While it was undoubtedly performed well, Frankie's Tango didn't feel like a Tango. Likewise the character of the American Smooth should be Fred & Ginger glamour.

I'd love to see them using latin music for the Salsa, Cha Cha Cha and Samba. Maybe half dances performed to contemporary music with the other performed to authentic would make a nice mix.
Doghouse Riley
02-11-2014
Originally Posted by alan_tracy:
“The music choice is also self limited by trying to avoid repeats. The number of songs that are a) recognisable to audiences b) suitable for conversion to dance and c) have not already been used is not great.”

Hang on!

There's thousands of tunes eminently suited to ballroom that haven't been used.

As one example check through the song book of Sinatra.

Susannah McCorkle, yes I know you haven't heard of her, was reputed to have a repertoire of over 3000 standards. Most "standards" are "danceable."
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map