Originally Posted by dander:
“I realise you are probably a lovely person and I do applaud your niceness in sticking up for the band but I guess I'm not as nice because I don't see why I should have to make allowances for professional musicians on a very high profile gig.
Ultimately though I definitely agree that the blame lies at the producer's door - the producer shouldn't be happy about the way the music sounds and should do what needs to be done to make it sound great - whether that means different musicians, more rehearsals, different music choices is the producer's job to work out and put in place.”
Sorry, it's not a case of "sticking up" for anyone. I'm not really being "a lovely person," I'm just expressing the little bit of basic musical knowledge I've gathered over the years, that many on here show that they similarly possess.
Some of the recordings you hear on CD's, can take months to record, every one of them can have the benefit of multi-tracking, editing, numerous takes, over-dubbing, some even have a bit of post-recording "key changing" for notes that are difficult for artists to reach.
It's going back a bit but, here's a classic example. It was clearly evident that Susannah Hoffs of the Bangles struggled if she attempted it "live" to make the full octave step in the last chorus of "Eternal Flame," she "managed" on the recording. She often sang it a sixth lower.
You're into the world of "make believe" in a recording studio.
And you want a live band to be able to replicate those sort of performances after a few run-throughs, of how many tunes?
I'm amazed how well they cope with the stupid and unreasonable demands of a ratings chasing numpty producer.