Originally Posted by xTonix:
“From what I have seen/read it is, double standards goes on as well, e.g with Lauren and Ben, who both celebrated getting through, but only Lauren get's called cocky, full of herself, ect.”
Then I think you are noticing one set of accusations and not the other.
Every year it happens and it's pretty much split down the middle in terms of gender. Last year there were threads and comments about Nicholas 'getting cocky' or complaining that he was excited for getting through to the final two and not showing due commiserations to Luke. Olly Murrs got it a loads in his year as did Matt Cardle in his.
My take on it is that it's nothing to do with gender, and everything to do with contestants who are perceived as 'threats' to other people's favourites. Lauren is widely considered a frontrunner. So if you don't like Lauren, or you just don't get why she's popular, and if your favourite appears to be struggling to get the support in comparison, then it's easy to disapprove and maybe even resent her celebration of being called safe. It's gauche, or it's disrespectful, whatever. Same goes for Nicholas, same goes for Olly and Matt. They were all up there competing for the top spots and it pisses people off.
XF lives and dies on us getting emotionally invested in our favourites, on becoming passionate in support or outraged at injustices. It's tabloid tittle-tattle, and it's tribal. It's why The Voice struggles so much, because it's too worthy to go for the cheap emotive stunts (or if they try, they're just not very good at it) and too short for us to 'gone on a journey' with the contestants. And having an emotionally charged audience leads to emotive outbursts, either positive or negative. These sorts of accusations are just one of the results. I don't believe it's gendered, just that sometimes the language is.