it clearly said on the phone, Danny Calling with the picture saying slide here to answer call or reject, lol.
did anyone notice the problem with the call that Danny and Clara were having?
Originally Posted by garbage456:
“it clearly said on the phone, Danny Calling with the picture saying slide here to answer call or reject, lol.”
“it clearly said on the phone, Danny Calling with the picture saying slide here to answer call or reject, lol.”
what was the problem ?
Originally Posted by Virgil Tracy:
“what was the problem ?”
“what was the problem ?”
They were talking but her phone was ringing if you bothered to read the first post you would of seen.
Originally Posted by garbage456:
“They were talking but her phone was ringing if you bothered to read the first post you would of seen.”
“They were talking but her phone was ringing if you bothered to read the first post you would of seen.”
I did read the first post but you didn't say "They were talking but her phone was ringing" (maybe you didn't read your own post )
.
Originally Posted by Virgil Tracy:
“I did read the first post but you didn't say "They were talking but her phone was ringing" (maybe you didn't read your own post )
.”
“I did read the first post but you didn't say "They were talking but her phone was ringing" (maybe you didn't read your own post )
.”
Read the title they were having a conversation you know what most people do. Did you watch the program. Do I really have to spoon feed you all the details.
Originally Posted by garbage456:
“They were talking but her phone was ringing if you bothered to read the first post you would of seen.”
“They were talking but her phone was ringing if you bothered to read the first post you would of seen.”
"Would have seen" or "would've seen"; never "would of seen".
Originally Posted by garbage456:
“Read the title they were having a conversation you know what most people do.”
“Read the title they were having a conversation you know what most people do.”
That doesn't even make sense.
I did see when she was talking to him at times it looked like it was still ringing and sometimes didn't look on at all.
Originally Posted by garbage456:
“Read the title they were having a conversation you know what most people do. Did you watch the program. Do I really have to spoon feed you all the details.”
“Read the title they were having a conversation you know what most people do. Did you watch the program. Do I really have to spoon feed you all the details.”
I did read the title , it says nothing about them having a conversation .
your post then refers to what normally appears on a phone screen when a call is incoming , as best as I could tell you were refering to that .
btw - are you usually so rude in your posts ?
.
Originally Posted by Dogmatix:
“"Would have seen" or "would've seen"; never "would of seen".”
“"Would have seen" or "would've seen"; never "would of seen".”
You quite clearly know what was meant. These ridiculous "correction" posts are cringe-inducingly common on here now. Some people just need to feel superior, I guess.
Originally Posted by Dogmatix:
“That doesn't even make sense.”
“That doesn't even make sense.”
Yes it does.
It really says a lot about someone when their sole response to a thread is to deride and correct grammar.
Originally Posted by garbage456:
“Read the title they were having a conversation you know what most people do. Did you watch the program. Do I really have to spoon feed you all the details.”
“Read the title they were having a conversation you know what most people do. Did you watch the program. Do I really have to spoon feed you all the details.”
Your top post and the thread title are both sentences that begin with lower case letters and this one is a question without a question mark.
Do we really have to spoon feed you common courtesy AND English grammar?
Originally Posted by SillyBillyGoat:
“It really says a lot about someone when their sole response to a thread is to deride and correct grammar.”
“It really says a lot about someone when their sole response to a thread is to deride and correct grammar.”
Yes, It says they're possibly lowering themselves somewhat in order to perform the social service of taking a pop at someone who needs taking down a peg or two from the looks of how they speak to people
Originally Posted by Shoppy:
“Yes, It says they're possibly lowering themselves somewhat in order to perform the social service of taking a pop at someone who needs taking down a peg or two from the looks of how they speak to people”
“Yes, It says they're possibly lowering themselves somewhat in order to perform the social service of taking a pop at someone who needs taking down a peg or two from the looks of how they speak to people
”
Yes, because that's constructive and mature.
Surely, a decent way to tackle someone who is being rude would be to pull them up specifically on the way they speak to people, rather than simply launching off on a tangent of mocking minor grammatical errors that had no bearing on how understandable the post was. I appreciate that the first responder to the thread genuinely misunderstood part of the opening post, but yourself and your fellow "social service" performer were simply nitpicking at irrelevent issues because you just dearly wanted to find something to mock the OP for.
I'm not sure what service is being fulfilled here, other than looking down on people (not just the OP) who possibly don't possess perfect grammatical skills, losing any right you had to be offended by rudeness in the first place.
So, no, you don't need to spoon-feed anyone English grammar. As for common courtesy, there is more than one person in this thread who could do with some classes on that particular subject.
