• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
No vote leaks thus far - does that mean we are voting just as the producers want?
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
jerefprdterra
06-11-2014
Originally Posted by yohinnchild:
“Laura White, Aiden Grimshaw, Lucie Jones, The Risk, Tamera Foster, Rhydian Roberts, Ella Henderson

Betting odds mean sweat FA in terms of the voting. I would say one or even two of the four you've listed aren't doing that well and someone like Stevi and Jay probably are doing a heck of a lot better than expected”

Stevi and Jay are just the novelty acts though that attract people for a few weeks, and then their interest wains.
yohinnchild
06-11-2014
Originally Posted by jerefprdterra:
“Stevi and Jay are just the novelty acts though that attract people for a few weeks, and then their interest wains.”

I think the fact Jay has been leading a fair few of the itune releases and is the only one to go top 10 shows his popularity is clearly more than just a fad. I don't understand it, but it's wrong to underestimate it.

I agree with the Stevi novelty though; however again I think he could be doing better than people are giving him credit for.

Also I don't think you got my point; the acts listed above were mostly beaten by novetly acts in where they placed anyway, despite all having 'better odds' - therefore to list the four you did and back it up with the odds is frankly silly
jerefprdterra
06-11-2014
Originally Posted by yohinnchild:
“I think the fact Jay has been leading a fair few of the itune releases and is the only one to go top 10 shows his popularity is clearly more than just a fad. I don't understand it, but it's wrong to underestimate it.

I agree with the Stevi novelty though; however again I think he could be doing better than people are giving him credit for.

Also I don't think you got my point; the acts listed above were mostly beaten by novetly acts in where they placed anyway, despite all having 'better odds' - therefore to list the four you did and back it up with the odds is frankly silly”

I can see where you are coming from.
Singy Thingy
06-11-2014
It may mean nothing at all, but if the "wrong" act(s) were in danger, I suppose showing them as getting the fewest votes might fire up their supporters .
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map