Quote:
“There's not much of a link between Virgin's fibre network and Virgin's "fibre" network (i.e. their copper coaxial cable TV one).”
“There's not much of a link between Virgin's fibre network and Virgin's "fibre" network (i.e. their copper coaxial cable TV one).”
I was just trying to find a reason as to why 3 seem to be dodging enabling even one 4G mast anywhere within about 7 miles of Congleton and that's generally the same throughout a lot of Cheshire, with many places not even having DC-HSDPA. 3G is currently running at an amazing 0.22mbps and is dire day and night. Interestingly when I put my work postcode into the coverage checker it returns this message
We've super-pumped our network signal in this area. To see how your coverage might change, enter a device below.
EE has managed to bring 4G to one small part of the Town about 9 months ago, but seems to have immediately given up doing the other 4. EE's 3G speeds are just as poor as 3's too, so i'm guessing its infrastructure based.





It's as if mobile industry buzzwords got together but couldn't quite make a coherent sentence.