• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment Services
  • Terrestrial
  • Freeview
Film4 +1 on BBC B mux - to be removed from ARQ B 20th November
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
lotrjw
21-11-2014
Originally Posted by AngusMast:
“On Freeview SD they were using MPEG2 at about 1.7Mb/s and MP2 audio at 128kb/s.

On Freeview HD they are using MPEG4 at about 1.2Mb/s and AAC at 96kb/s

Less bits, but the amount of efficiency gain with the newer codecs is greater, so it will look and sound better.”

Lol so its like an MPEG2 encoded channel at 2.4Mbps!
chrisy
21-11-2014
Originally Posted by AngusMast:
“On Freeview SD they were using MPEG2 at about 1.7Mb/s and MP2 audio at 128kb/s.

On Freeview HD they are using MPEG4 at about 1.2Mb/s and AAC at 96kb/s

Less bits, but the amount of efficiency gain with the newer codecs is greater, so it will look and sound better.”

Although Film4+1 is lower resolution than Film4, so it should look worse than that...
DragonQ
22-11-2014
Originally Posted by AngusMast:
“On Freeview SD they were using MPEG2 at about 1.7Mb/s and MP2 audio at 128kb/s.

On Freeview HD they are using MPEG4 at about 1.2Mb/s and AAC at 96kb/s

Less bits, but the amount of efficiency gain with the newer codecs is greater, so it will look and sound better.”

It's not MPEG4, it's AVC. MPEG4 is a generic term covering several codecs (over more than one generation).
bobcar
22-11-2014
Originally Posted by Mark C:
“Bollocks ! It benefits any screen size, as long as the native resolution is 1920 x 1080”

Not that much to do with the native resolution, the quality of the TV is more important and a 1320x768 may knock spots of a 1920x1080 but the screen size is the most important thing when judging whether HD will improve the picture or not. Actually an HD transmission will usually look better even when viewing via SCART because of the better compression.
Bearboydave
23-11-2014
Thanks, AngusMast. I rarely watch any SD Freeview channels on my big Samsung as the pictures are all generally lousy but Film4+1 definitely is slightly better. (The Freesat SD pics on it are streets ahead. HD is good on either). I hope C4 get out of their Sky tie-up so we can have Film4 HD on Freeview
DragonQ
01-12-2014
Originally Posted by lotrjw:
“Lol so its like an MPEG2 encoded channel at 2.4Mbps!”

A luxury in 2014!
jjne
06-12-2014
Originally Posted by chrisy:
“Although Film4+1 is lower resolution than Film4, so it should look worse than that...”

Resolution isn't everything.

I would rather watch a 'soft', but relatively artefact-free picture than a 'sharper' one with ringing and blocking everywhere.

The T2 SD images provide that.
Think TV
13-12-2014
Wow, to bring you the latest on the null packets transmitted at night (01:26 GMT) for BBC B multiplex is reportedly at 23.2Mbps, with all channels sampled, BBC One HD, BBC Two HD, BBC Three HD, ITV HD, Channel 4 HD and Film4+1. Seemingly BBC Four HD/Cbeebies HD and BBC News HD could move from COM7 mux to BBC B mux?

However, the mux was transmitting 9.6Mbps of null packets earlier on Friday (around 14:30 GMT)

Source: http://en.digitalbitrate.com/dtv.php...ng=en&mux=BBCB
eladkse
13-12-2014
Originally Posted by Think TV:
“Wow, to bring you the latest on the null packets transmitted at night (01:26 GMT) for BBC B multiplex is reportedly at 23.2Mbps, with all channels sampled, BBC One HD, BBC Two HD, BBC Three HD, ITV HD, Channel 4 HD and Film4+1. Seemingly BBC Four HD/Cbeebies HD and BBC News HD could move from COM7 mux to BBC B mux?

However, the mux was transmitting 9.6Mbps of null packets earlier on Friday (around 14:30 GMT)

Source: http://en.digitalbitrate.com/dtv.php...ng=en&mux=BBCB”

Just by the screencaps, I would say the COM7 signal isn't the strongest wherever the receiver is. When visiting the website in the past, I've seen that particular mux completely drop out sometimes, so I would take the figures with a pinch of salt (unless someone on the forum verifies of course).

As you note in your post, you have to look at the bigger picture. Even if last night's figure was accurate, the peaks are probably more important - about 9Mbps spare. More likely space for a single HD channel. (so status quo really)
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map