• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
SCD Week 8 (Blackpool) Discussion Thread - Sat 7pm/Sun 7.15pm
<<
<
13 of 63
>>
>
anyonefortennis
15-11-2014
The professional dancers who have trained for years must be thrilled by Darceys comments. *rollseyes*
Anya D
15-11-2014
I loved it, but it was very Janettecentric.
I really enjoyed watching it though and actually enjoyed the part the additional dancers played, which I generally don't.
Laptop Lil
15-11-2014
I think the backing dancers could be in the bottom two tonight
toofast
15-11-2014
Originally Posted by penelopesimpson:
“I am not a big fan of Tess, but I have to say she is being judged on a job she should never have been given. She simply doesn't have what it takes to be a No. 1, even though she was an adequate No. 2 to a very specific No. 1. in Bruce. She is wooden, her excitement sounds faux and no amount of scripting is going to improve her.”

Spot on. She presents like she is talking to a class of 5 year olds, She sounds so scripted and acted in it's delivery.
Thank for lord for Zoe!
What name??
15-11-2014
I liked the character and mood but would like her to push him more on the dancing rather than tge dazzle. Jake did it well.
Arcana
15-11-2014
Jake & Janette

9, 9, 9, 9 = 36
Mrs F
15-11-2014
Originally Posted by penelopesimpson:
“Why are we having extra dancers?”

to fill the space?
penelopesimpson
15-11-2014
Originally Posted by mrbernay:
“At least we're not having standing ovations this week (yet....)”

What? For those of us who can't see, Tess has just drawn our attention, a la Bruce
Big Boy Barry
15-11-2014
Great score

Four 9's
Hogs Head
15-11-2014
Hmmm, I don't think it was worth 36 at all.
richie4eva
15-11-2014
Much better from Jake, deserved 9's
tonycollins100
15-11-2014
There are too many distractions. The jazzy flashing lights and particularly jakes supporting dancers.
StrictlyEastend
15-11-2014
Four nines, well deserved.
FiercelyHip
15-11-2014
Extremely overmarked.
Anightlikethis
15-11-2014
wow a 9 from Craig!!
Rhumbatugger
15-11-2014
Originally Posted by MissMidgard:
“Have to say, having thought about it, the foxtrot section in the middle was very well done.”

I'll watch it again.

I think it was worth eights. And I'm a MASSIVE fan of Jake and vote for him (and Sunetra and Caroline).
BFGArmy
15-11-2014
I wasn't expecting that from Craig. But pleased to see it - good for Jake.
Fudd
15-11-2014
He barely danced and got straight 9s.

If the judges aren't going to be critical then why should the public?
BuddyBontheNet
15-11-2014
Originally Posted by valkay:
“I was watching an old Miss Marple earlier, and Jake was in it as a teenage tearaway, with a head full of red hair.”

Wish I'd seen that!

That routine was much more BTF than SCD. I like Janette, but her lack of Ballroom is showing and letting him down - well it was until the judges gave 4 9s. I know nothing!
Gordon_McKinnon
15-11-2014
Overmarked but thought it would be
edy10
15-11-2014
Originally Posted by owen10:
“A couple of tens maybe”

For what he hardly did anything
Originally Posted by Mr_XcX:
“It was all about Janette though.

She should showcase him as the celeb. Not the other way round.”

Exactly
stargazer61
15-11-2014
Great score for Jake!
bigbro24
15-11-2014
They obviously don't want him in the dance off
Natalie_Cranny
15-11-2014
Originally Posted by Hogs Head:
“Hmmm, I don't think it was worth 36 at all.”

Is Donny under there scoring for the judges? No way was that worth 36???!?!?
FrostyJim
15-11-2014
We'll definitely have a 40 tonight going by these scores. I'm guessing........Judy?
<<
<
13 of 63
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map