|
||||||||
Should DTC make the Beales and the Mitchells have more kids? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,201
|
Should DTC make the Beales and the Mitchells have more kids?
Phil with Sharon?
Ian with....? Anyone but Rainie.... Would be nice to have their legacy live on for the future....we only really have Ben and Bobby...and maybe Peter... |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
|
It's a difficult one because Phil and Sharon don't make the best parents and age is a factor, babies storylines can drag a character down and then you have the fact the children are pretty useless for a good couple of years but then on the other had I think having a legacy for future characters and families are also important.
Ian i think is done unless him & Jane reunite and have a surrogate baby but that is unlikely, it's been the huge downside of killing of Lucy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,701
|
I think they've left it too late, but about a decade ago they should have definitely tried to get as many babies as they could, but then again I guess it was quite frustrating and would have been tedious to have Ian Beale/Phil Mitchell father consecutive children.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,701
|
Plus the point of children being pretty much useless and just a burden for the first 14/15 years after they're born.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London Town
Posts: 8,791
|
Jesus don't give Sharon another kid. The one she's got has almost ruined her as a character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
The Mitchells have Ben, Mark jr, Courtney, Louise, Lola, Lexi, William, Janet, Ami, Richard and baby Cotton/Mitchell.
The Beales will still have Peter, Steven and Bobby and then the Fowler branch Martin, Mark jr, Vicky and Rebecca. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
|
I can actually see the Beales being extended sideways at some point via Paulines brother Kennys family and I imagine children will be part of the mix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
|
I think the next best thing would be a long lost child, full formed from some random affair or one night stand lets be honest they've all got a long arse history of exes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,201
|
Quote:
I think the next best thing would be a long lost child, full formed from some random affair or one night stand lets be honest they've all got a long arse history of exes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
|
Perhaps its time for some male mitchell cousins to appear?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Quote:
Phil with Sharon?
Ian with....? Anyone but Rainie.... Would be nice to have their legacy live on for the future....we only really have Ben and Bobby...and maybe Peter... We already have Ben Mitchell Louise Mitchell Courtney Mitchell Mark Fowler (Mitchell) Richard Mitchell (Branning) Dennis Rickman Mitchell Peter Beale Bobby Beale And Cindy and Beth. That's a fair legacy isn't it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Plus of course Amy Mitchell Branning and Ronnie's next baby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London
Posts: 6,362
|
Quote:
Phil with Sharon?
Ian with....? Anyone but Rainie.... Would be nice to have their legacy live on for the future....we only really have Ben and Bobby...and maybe Peter... I hope they used a condom, maybe two for good measure! Ian is ageing too so I'm not sure about him having another child. Mind you it could be interesting if he had another daughter and becomes an over protective father. Perhaps Peter could father a baby but
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Firefox♂
Posts: 8,304
|
Quote:
Phil with Sharon?
Ian with....? Anyone but Rainie.... Would be nice to have their legacy live on for the future....we only really have Ben and Bobby...and maybe Peter... ![]() Roxy and alex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
|
Oh gosh, please no more kids yet!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
|
Quote:
No. There are enough already and potential for more.
We already have Ben Mitchell Louise Mitchell Courtney Mitchell Mark Fowler (Mitchell) Richard Mitchell (Branning) Dennis Rickman Mitchell Peter Beale Bobby Beale And Cindy and Beth. That's a fair legacy isn't it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
|
No but I wish there were more Watts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The Sixth Circle of Hell
Posts: 20,236
|
Quote:
No but I wish there were more Watts.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: HELL! ... 5th DB7
Posts: 10,041
|
Maybe Sharon and Phil could adopt a kid rather than have a baby.
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,729
|
Last year before they split up I thought it would have been a good idea to have Denise pregnant with Ian's baby. We need more Beales and a storyline showing Ian and Denise becoming parents again later in life could have been interesting. Denise is only 44 so still young enough to have a baby. There have been older mums than her Kathy was 46 and a grandmother of 3 when she had Ben.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
|
Quote:
Well there is one but unfortunately she has been turned into Philth Mitchell's doormat.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,128
|
the Beales are a little low on kids true (even more so with Peter leaving) Cindy I guess is helping, but she is not a Beale, the Mitchells on the other hand have loads of kids, they are just off screen.
Meanwhile Lexi is a Mitchell and kinda a Beale. As has been mentioned, Ian and Phil are both too old for more kids now (shame Lucy and Peter have or are leaving) still Ronnie and Roxy can pop out a few more Mitchells. I have more concerns about the Beales on this front than the Mitchells. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
Quote:
the Beales are a little low on kids true (even more so with Peter leaving) Cindy I guess is helping, but she is not a Beale, the Mitchells on the other hand have loads of kids, they are just off screen.
Meanwhile Lexi is a Mitchell and kinda a Beale. As has been mentioned, Ian and Phil are both too old for more kids now (shame Lucy and Peter have or are leaving) still Ronnie and Roxy can pop out a few more Mitchells. I have more concerns about the Beales on this front than the Mitchells. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,687
|
Bobby is getting to an age now where he can feature heavily in his own storylines, at least Ian has Jane to keep him going in storylines. I do feel though that maybe a long lost child of Ian's could be introduced from a one night stand? Typical I know but it'll be another Beale.
As for the Mitchell's, they could reintroduce Louise who will be 13 now. I think we need more Watts personally |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:27.



I hope they used a condom, maybe two for good measure! Ian is ageing too so I'm not sure about him having another child. Mind you it could be interesting if he had another daughter and becomes an over protective father. Perhaps Peter could father a baby but 