Originally Posted by Philip Wales:
“I like her, but yesterday I think she let herself down. The bottle design was horrible, if your going to use a white label, then the rest has got to be classy looking and a very minimal design. If you going for a colour punch type logo then the labels got to be colour too or the thing looks insipid which it did. For someone who I would imagine sees a lot of drinks containers in her job, it was poor.
What I find strange in all these tasks, is no one ever seems to think right what does so and so do, which colours do so and so use. I mean these companies spend millions on marketing, but no one ever seems to use them as a sounding board. We've had a few tasks where people have gone into supermarkets to have a look but its rare and thats usually in place of a focus group.”
But if no one takes them to look at the competition , They don't get to see the competition.
You are right - in the old US series some of the classic wins start with a trip to the shops/supermarket see how things are done by the professionals . But if the production team don't take you there, you can't do that..
Blue water and yellow pineapple has a logic - in that it follows the ingredients, and can't look too garish, or artificial and sell as healthy. Mark's team had no better ideas, and the only idea they sent back was the same one that Katie/Daniel had fed them. It just looks too dull - reflecting a duller concept. .An exciting advert/ name/promotion/can for a dull concept is a big challenge. Neither of them, though, is offering an advertising agency or claiming to be artists.
Things were only better with the other team because the can and name did stand out more. But even that can had the bone design issue The other team also had their own massive failure at the strategic level - in that there was no concept to go with the name anyway. They ended with a can and name , but no concept, or supporting argument, to base an advert on.