DS Forums

 
 

All networks 3G and 4G coverage maps snapshot


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20-11-2014, 23:24
Everything Goes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259

Ever wanted to easily compare 3G and 4G coverage for all 4 networks in one go but were unable to? Well fret no more. Here is a snapshot of 3G and 4G coverage for all networks as of June 2014. EE has the best followed closely by Three. O2 and Vodafone coming in last by a very wide margin showing what a decade of minimal investment will do!

http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php...g-roaming.html

The article is about National Roaming and is worth a read.
Everything Goes is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 20-11-2014, 23:33
d123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,993
Vodafone is absolutely awful on those maps, even compared to O2.
d123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2014, 23:38
KesterK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 2,618
Ever wanted to easily compare 3G and 4G coverage for all 4 networks in one go but were unable to? Well fret no more. Here is a snapshot of 3G and 4G coverage for all networks as of June 2014. EE has the best followed closely by Three. O2 and Vodafone coming in last by a very wide margin showing what a decade of minimal investment will do!

http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php...g-roaming.html

The article is about National Roaming and is worth a read.
Amazed at how patchy Vodafone and O2's national coverage is! However, not been following the 4G roll outs of anyone other than EE, surprised at how fast Vodafone and O2 are catching EE up, but what's going on with three's 4G?
KesterK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2014, 23:44
Zebb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 652
Are there any mobile phone aerials in that mast in the first photo?

O2 have started with 4G coverage in a little village around here not in the major cities or towns, very strange.

Those maps should change dramatically when the 4G DD coverage gets going next year.
Zebb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2014, 23:53
Everything Goes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
Amazed at how patchy Vodafone and O2's national coverage is! However, not been following the 4G roll outs of anyone other than EE, surprised at how fast Vodafone and O2 are catching EE up, but what's going on with three's 4G?
The problem for O2 and Vodafone is they only belatedly met Ofcom's 3G coverage obligations and did little beyond that. They both have a huge amount of work to do to even get remotely near EE. Three and EE continued to invest in their data networks beyond their coverage obligation's while O2 and Vodafone did nothing.
Everything Goes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 00:13
Step666
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,274
Amazed at how patchy Vodafone and O2's national coverage is!
The most amazing thing about Vodafone, IMO, is how frequently I can have decent signal but not actually be able to do anything - full bars H+ yet webpages won't load, apps that require data access don't update/refresh.

The problem isn't the handset, I go through them too quickly; nor is it the location as I've experienced it all over Scotland and a bit more - from Berwick to Dingwall.
Step666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 00:30
jonmorris
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
I find the same (good signal, no data) on O2 and Vodafone, and before the merger, it was just as bad on Orange. Perhaps worse in many places.

Orange clearly gained an awful lot by merging with T-Mobile, and the additional benefit of T-Mobile having already teamed up with Three. Both T-Mobile and Three had been investing heavily in 3G with data in mind.

Hell, Orange was so bad for me that when I could roam onto T-Mobile early on but 2G only, I did so because T-Mobile 2G data worked when Orange 2G or 3G data often didn't!

The question is whether O2 and Vodafone will now spend the money to rectify all the problems, with the added benefit of improving both 3G and 2G coverage at the same time. If it can, we can hopefully forget that three networks were happy to get so complacent and got away with it for years.

Problem is, history has a tendency of repeating itself.
jonmorris is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 00:57
The Lord Lucan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,966
The most amazing thing about Vodafone, IMO, is how frequently I can have decent signal but not actually be able to do anything - full bars H+ yet webpages won't load, apps that require data access don't update/refresh.

The problem isn't the handset, I go through them too quickly; nor is it the location as I've experienced it all over Scotland and a bit more - from Berwick to Dingwall.
You are not the only one.. I sometimes see a stronger signal with Voda than any other network. For it to only be in giving data of less than <1mb on 3G and 2-4mb on 4G with huge latency or nothing at all..
The Lord Lucan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 04:33
PencilBreath
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 3,345
it'll be 6G by the time o2 pulls their finger out of their ass & provides 4g for Aberdeen
PencilBreath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 07:25
1saintly
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,665
Take no notice of those maps. The O2 one shows i can drive from Hull to Liverpool with a 3g signal all the way. yeah right whatever, i know from experience, you wont get that. and same for drive up to Newcastle New phones at xmas will not be withO2 signal is crap, its a embarrassment the state of mobile phone network in the uk. Same goes for broadband.
rip off uk again, and dont get me started on kevin bacon!
Weve got sky go, iplayer etc etc, but you try using them on a mobile device and if you are lucky to get a signal, youre data usage screws you.
Rant over
1saintly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 14:26
de525ma
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 787
it'll be 6G by the time o2 pulls their finger out of their ass & provides 4g for Aberdeen
Well the O2 mast on St Machar drive was replaced last week, and is now providing Vodafone 4G, so I'd expect O2 to be along very soon. The cabinets are there.
de525ma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 15:01
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
Those Vodafone (and to a slightly lesser extent O2) 3G maps look utterly woeful.

3's 4G coverage map looks broken. I know that they're way behind compared to the other networks but I'd bet that it's a lot better than almost 0%?
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 16:07
maverickjesus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 100
Ofcom have refused to use Three's coverage/metrics data for 4G, because they aren't happy with how accurate it is (its on one of the ISP review articles, something to do with Three being quite opaque as to how the figures are calculated). Thats why there is no 4G on there.
maverickjesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 17:52
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
Ofcom have refused to use Three's coverage/metrics data for 4G, because they aren't happy with how accurate it is (its on one of the ISP review articles, something to do with Three being quite opaque as to how the figures are calculated). Thats why there is no 4G on there.
That would make more sense. Hopefully 3 aren't trying to embellish their pitiful 4G coverage and impending failure to meet that end of the year target
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 18:54
Resonance
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,212
Tallies with my experience. O2 (Tesco) forget it for data outside of towns/cities. EE is so much better.

When visiting Scotland O2's coverage is a joke (as the maps confirm).

It amazes me that O2 keep managing to add customers. I just don't get it?
Resonance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 19:20
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
It amazes me that O2 keep managing to add customers. I just don't get it?
Because people don't know better. I have been on a train multiple times where people accept horrific GPRS performance and assume it's the train or that it is a rural area that is making it bad, when other networks perform so much better in the same spot - such as 3, where I can stream netflix while they struggle to get email.

e.g. David Cameron suddenly thinking rural coverage is bad because he couldn't use his (probably Vodafone or O2) phone in Cornwall, when 3 or EE would probably have been so much better

O2 also has the iPhone legacy where people moved to them to get the iPhone when it was exclusive and can't be bothered to move elsewhere
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 19:41
Everything Goes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
Because people don't know better. I have been on a train multiple times where people accept horrific GPRS performance and assume it's the train or that it is a rural area that is making it bad, when other networks perform so much better in the same spot - such as 3, where I can stream netflix while they struggle to get email.

e.g. David Cameron suddenly thinking rural coverage is bad because he couldn't use his (probably Vodafone or O2) phone in Cornwall, when 3 or EE would probably have been so much better

O2 also has the iPhone legacy where people moved to them to get the iPhone when it was exclusive and can't be bothered to move elsewhere

It had been reported on another thread that it was indeed Vodafone that David Cameron was using

The iPhone tie in with O2 is an interesting one. O2 has by far the lowest Smartphone penetration at 50% which it just reached this year while other networks are a lot more. Even Vodafone are at 63.8%. Perhaps O2 tied in some initial customers who didn't leave but they have since then pretty much stagnated. Probably due to useless data network.

Where is Wavejock to defend O2's wise lack of investment
Everything Goes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 20:35
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
Where is Wavejock to defend O2's wise lack of investment

He's banned again.
Thine Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 21:19
Everything Goes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
He's banned again.
That must be about a week now.......
Everything Goes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 21:43
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
What a pleasant week it has been too, just nice discussion and we've all got along.
Thine Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 22:44
Everything Goes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
What a pleasant week it has been too, just nice discussion and we've all got along.
Its been great people have been having proper discussions
Everything Goes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 22:53
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
To be fair, in my experience all networks are equally crap on the train (at least South West train routes). Number one: there are massive areas with no masts at all, as there are no people living in these areas and Network Rail hasn't given mobile phone companies access to the land (don't know why).

The trains also block the signals - what a fantastic idea that was.
Gigabit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2014, 22:56
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
That must be about a week now.......
Permabanned?
Gigabit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2014, 01:29
The Lord Lucan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,966
Network Rail is to become a bit more open shortly regarding train coverage..

Mibby..

However It's good entertainment to let him come back occasionally to then get banned again..
The Lord Lucan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2014, 13:07
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
To be fair, in my experience all networks are equally crap on the train (at least South West train routes). Number one: there are massive areas with no masts at all, as there are no people living in these areas and Network Rail hasn't given mobile phone companies access to the land (don't know why).

The trains also block the signals - what a fantastic idea that was.
I use First Great Western between Cornwall and London and it isn't that bad on 3 or EE, but awful on VF or O2, which mirrors the situation for most people.

NR is trying to improve data coverage but one hurdle is that their masts were typically built without planning permission, which they are entitled to do because they host a safety critical network for railway use so reliability trumps aesthetics, but putting equipment to host a public mobile network will need permission and could be denied due to NIMBYism
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.