• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Out Of Here!
Hoping Kendra is eligible to be voted for the Live Trial...
Fiercefanatic
23-11-2014
Not liking this CIA thing one bit... don't see why they can't still do trials

Kendra would be so funny to watch having a meltdown... LIVE!!!
DiamondDoll
23-11-2014
Disagree.

I like when someone actually does the trials.
Jimmy Connors
23-11-2014
I'd rather they won some stars. Poor Michael Buerk is wasting away. He's all skin and bone. The man needs some food.
Stupid_Head
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by DiamondDoll:
“Disagree.

I like when someone actually does the trials.”

Me too, I do like the OTT screams as well as actually trying but someone who combines the two is best to watch.
Callous
23-11-2014
All that would happen is the entire LIVE trial would be wasted. Completely dull viewing.

They might be able to coax her to do a pre-recorded trial over a couple of hours..but no chance with a live one.

I never understand why the public go for the same person again and again as it always gets dull after a couple of days..the longer Kendra is exempt the better (although I'd be interested to see how she'd do in a physical trial as opposed to an insect one).
Paace
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by Fiercefanatic:
“Not liking this CIA thing one bit... don't see why they can't still do trials

Kendra would be so funny to watch having a meltdown... LIVE!!! ”

Are you a sadist ?
scout2006
23-11-2014
I'd rather see Michael, Jake, Nadia or Edwina do the live trial. Let's see someone who hasn't done a trial yet.
Sarah_James3
23-11-2014
Think kendra should do the live trial. It is. It right that four campmates are excluded from the trials just because they are secret agents. Itv you are the joke. What have edwina and jake done since they entered the camp, answer nothing apart from lie to the others. Obviously would love a twist tonight when they are told they are eligible for the trials. That would be entertaining.
Blondie X
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by Callous:
“All that would happen is the entire LIVE trial would be wasted. Completely dull viewing.

They might be able to coax her to do a pre-recorded trial over a couple of hours..but no chance with a live one.

I never understand why the public go for the same person again and again as it always gets dull after a couple of days..the longer Kendra is exempt the better (although I'd be interested to see how she'd do in a physical trial as opposed to an insect one).”

Absolutely this. I can't understand why people think the same person squealing night after night is good tv.

I've seen enough of Kendra and her 'ewww this is gross' to last me a lifetime. I actually like to see people doing well in the trials and giving it a good go
MaisieMooMoo
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“Absolutely this. I can't understand why people think the same person squealing night after night is good tv.

I've seen enough of Kendra and her 'ewww this is gross' to last me a lifetime. I actually like to see people doing well in the trials and giving it a good go”

Absolutely agree. How can it be entertaining when each trial is cut short when she refuses to do any more? I want to see somebody do the lot. I've high hopes for Mel tonight, she seems to relish the challenge.
benjamini
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by Fiercefanatic:
“Not liking this CIA thing one bit... don't see why they can't still do trials

Kendra would be so funny to watch having a meltdown... LIVE!!! ”

With respect this ^^^^ is everything that's wrong with the show. Wanting to see some one in melt down, wanting the campers to starve, what's entertaining in that? We have seen it year after year and it's bloody boring . Sorry OP I strongly disagree.
Bela
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by Fiercefanatic:
“Not liking this CIA thing one bit... don't see why they can't still do trials

Kendra would be so funny to watch having a meltdown... LIVE!!! ”

No she wouldn't. We've already seen her meltdown twice and, while I felt genuinely sorry for her the first time, the second one wasn't remotely entertaining and a real waste of a trial.
Reality Sucks
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by Jimmy Connors:
“I'd rather they won some stars. Poor Michael Buerk is wasting away. He's all skin and bone. The man needs some food.”

I think he was like that before he went in
Blondie X
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by Bela:
“No she wouldn't. We've already seen her meltdown twice and, while I felt genuinely sorry for her the first time, the second one wasn't remotely entertaining and a real waste of a trial.”

I agree. The catacombs trial was like watching paint dry. I would have rather seen someone getting stuck in than seeing Kendra having a breakdown
grazemytvaddict
23-11-2014
I want to see Michael or Edwina do a trial see how they would handle it.
Reality Sucks
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by benjamini:
“With respect this ^^^^ is everything that's wrong with the show. Wanting to see some one in melt down, wanting the campers to starve, what's entertaining in that? We have seen it year after year and it's bloody boring . Sorry OP I strongly disagree. ”

I strongly disagree too. I don't mind people having meltdowns over personality clashes such as Lynn Franks V Janice Dickenson. But subjecting them to things that are inhumane (the cockroach shaker thing for example) would be enough to traumatise most people. had she not had that trial the day before, she may have done a lot better at the other one.

I don't think it's entertaining to see people frozen with fear, like the night that Craig and Nadia had to spend in that room after already enduring days in the prison eating nothing but porridge.


I think that programme makers may be mis judging what people want to see. When you go to the website it's all about the "terrifying" trials. I don't even watch them - it's the people I'm interested in.
Bela
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by Reality Sucks:
“I strongly disagree too. I don't mind people having meltdowns over personality clashes such as Lynn Franks V Janice Dickenson. But subjecting them to things that are inhumane (the cockroack shaker thing for example) would be enough to traumatise most people. had she not had that trial the day before, she may have done a lot better at the other one.

I don't think it's entertaining to see people frozen with fear, like the night that Craig and Nadia had to spend in that room after already enduring days in the prison eating nothing but porridge.

I think that programme makers may be mis judging what people want to see. When you go to the website it's all about the "terrifying" trials. I don't even watch them - it's the people I'm interested in.”

^ That was a particular low point. It was just sadistic. And that fact that both Craig and Nadia were/are such nice people (and had already endured more than enough trauma as it was) made it somehow even more sadistic.
Reality Sucks
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by Bela:
“^ That was a particular low point. It was just sadistic. And that fact that both Craig and Nadia were/are such nice people (and had already endured more than enough trauma as it was) made it somehow even more sadistic.”

Exactly - where's the enjoyment, either for the participants or for the people watching?

Kendra's last trial wasn't good because she was past caring.
jeanoj
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by DiamondDoll:
“Disagree.

I like when someone actually does the trials.”

Me too - she is a drama queen who shouldn't be allowed more air time IMO
Tess-g
23-11-2014
ITV must know what the public are likely to do by now. It costs time and money to set up the challenges which is just wasted and they have less to show us on the show.

Someone on another thread has just suggested that after doing a trial they are exempt for the next 2 days. I think that would be a great move.
Fizix
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by benjamini:
“With respect this ^^^^ is everything that's wrong with the show. Wanting to see some one in melt down, wanting the campers to starve, what's entertaining in that? We have seen it year after year and it's bloody boring . Sorry OP I strongly disagree. ”

^ this
Cats_Eyes
23-11-2014
Originally Posted by benjamini:
“With respect this ^^^^ is everything that's wrong with the show. Wanting to see some one in melt down, wanting the campers to starve, what's entertaining in that? We have seen it year after year and it's bloody boring . Sorry OP I strongly disagree. ”

Well said and 100% right.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map