|
||||||||
No good 3g signal in Kensington, London |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,927
|
No good 3g signal in Kensington, London
A month or two ago I bought an iPhone 5s and stuck in a nano card to which my Vodafone number had been transferred. We are in a 4g area (and don't bloody Vodafone plug it) but here at work in High St Kensington, I have stuck with a 3g card (4g costs extra according to Vodafone, and really I don't see the point) am only getting at best E and all-too-often GPRS. When I raised it with the Vodafone shop just up the road, I was told that 'all phones are different in the signal they get', but I suspect that is bullshit. An iPhone not getting a good signal? What are other people's thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
|
Sounds like typical Vodafone to me - I am surprised it is so bad in London though.
I'd get an EE/Three (as their 3G coverage is the same) PAYG SIM and test it out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,966
|
I have family who live near to Holland Park. O2/EE have ok 4G there. However coverage is generally poor around there indoors due to the lack of sites/big buildings to hide the masts on and it being a strict area planning wise. They had to wait ages for fibre as the cabinet was rejected a few times. I've found coverage is particularly bad around the Palace side.
Vodafone suffers major breathing and therefore coverage issues on 3G as I've found the signal is so much stronger in the early hours although that shouldn't affect the 4G which in theory be similar to O2's.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Homerton, London, E9
Posts: 1,742
|
I live in Ealing and it's the same here too on Vodafone. Diabolical service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 145
|
Quote:
...am only getting at best E and all-too-often GPRS. When I raised it with the Vodafone shop just up the road, I was told that 'all phones are different in the signal they get', but I suspect that is bullshit. An iPhone not getting a good signal? What are other people's thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,966
|
Quote:
To be clear: you have never seen 3G on your phone or it's just in this area you don't have 3G? The Vodafone coverage checker naturally claims wall to wall 3G coverage and to be fair that would be expected from all operators in central London!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,927
|
Quote:
To be clear: you have never seen 3G on your phone or it's just in this area you don't have 3G? The Vodafone coverage checker naturally claims wall to wall 3G coverage and to be fair that would be expected from all operators in central London!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 901
|
Quote:
I have family who live near to Holland Park. O2/EE have ok 4G there. However coverage is generally poor around there indoors due to the lack of sites/big buildings to hide the masts on and it being a strict area planning wise. They had to wait ages for fibre as the cabinet was rejected a few times. I've found coverage is particularly bad around the Palace side.
Vodafone suffers major breathing and therefore coverage issues on 3G as I've found the signal is so much stronger in the early hours although that shouldn't affect the 4G which in theory be similar to O2's.. I live in an area where a large number of applications have been turned down. Its a hilly area as well so coverage is terrible. I would quite happily have a mast at the end of my driveway. People are so fickle. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
|
They "cause cancer" though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
|
Vodafone has the least 3G coverage of all the networks, and 4G is new and still being rolled out. I would definitely look at the coverage maps before signing up and maybe even try a free or cheap PAYG test sim before committing to a contract with any network.
EE and Three seem to offer the best wide scale coverage for data. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,865
|
EE is pretty rubbish as well. I miss many calls because the caller gets a constant engaged tone or a message saying your call can't be connected right now. The calls don't even go to voicemail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,966
|
Quote:
EE is pretty rubbish as well. I miss many calls because the caller gets a constant engaged tone or a message saying your call can't be connected right now. The calls don't even go to voicemail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,927
|
Quote:
EE is pretty rubbish as well. I miss many calls because the caller gets a constant engaged tone or a message saying your call can't be connected right now. The calls don't even go to voicemail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 901
|
Quote:
I recently heard a report on Radio 4's From Our Own Correspondent from a BBC reporter who spends a lot of time in Africa how he has very little trouble getting a signal in all kinds of out of the way places in Central Africa, and is always astounded when he comes back to Britain who piss-poor the service from all operators is, especially out of town.
In Africa they don't give a toss where they put the masts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,966
|
I've been to parts of Africa.. Yes you get coverage but it's hugely unreliable. Hard to compare a country with huge expances of land with one of the strictest planning authorities in the UK as well as being of the most populous..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,865
|
The coverage in NYC is much better than London. Maybe that's because they are not as fussy where they put their masts as they don't seem to be fussy about what they build there either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 59,737
|
Quote:
I recently heard a report on Radio 4's From Our Own Correspondent from a BBC reporter who spends a lot of time in Africa how he has very little trouble getting a signal in all kinds of out of the way places in Central Africa, and is always astounded when he comes back to Britain who piss-poor the service from all operators is, especially out of town.
1) In remote areas they often have no landline infrastructure so need good mobile coverage 2) Lack of planning restrictions. Masts get put wherever the operator and/or government wants In the UK it is still common to have no 3G in the middle of big cities and once you are in the countryside all bets are off. Rather than rolling out 4G I would prefer networks got their 3G coverage working properly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,927
|
Quote:
In the UK it is still common to have no 3G in the middle of big cities and once you are in the countryside all bets are off. Rather than rolling out 4G I would prefer networks got their 3G coverage working properly.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:53.

