Originally Posted by alanwarwic:
“We even had professional Apple users here agreeing that Apple famously held back features so that they can drip feed them in future models thus making the maximum amount of money.
Whilst the 6 is like a Nexus 4, the Plus is more a Galaxy Note copycat from mid 2011.
If there is an iPhone 7 I'd say it is a plastic 7 or 8" iPad with phone functionality as standard (a Galaxy Tab copycat).
The fallen off a cliff iPad sales necessitate it. The iWatch complements demand.
They might even strait jacket it with only 1GB of Ram again. (so the Air can stay the expensive 'functional' iPad).”
I think that whole drip feeding of features theory needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.
It seems to make a pretty big assumption - namely that a significant proportion of people buy new iPhones every year.
I'm sure some might, but most who do that would probably buy a new iPhone every year anyway, just based on improved specs generally, rather than based on whatever specific feature Apple apparently didn't include.
Basically the proportion of people who buy an iPhone every year will be a minority. And the proportion of that group who wouldn't buy a new iPhone every year regardless will likely be a minority of that group.
So we are to believe that Apple have done their sums and decided better to withold features for those extra few sales to that minority of a minority, than it is to include them earlier to maximise the appeal to everyone.
Straight Jackie sounds serious though - what's that all about? Is it where iOS devices are effectively crippled because of the issue with tabs in Safari?