Originally Posted by Stiggles:
“I already have given examples from one post, but as always you brushed them aside. Although in fairness your list was nothing. I wouldn't class telling the truth as being rude. You for example, look for rudeness in every post anyone makes. It's your classic closing line.”
You mean where I described this:
"Well i suggest you hop on over and tell apple you have it sussed then.
Since you know it all as always, and think you are spot on, I'm sure you can squash this case immediately!!"
As unconstructive childish sarcasm? It was, so I didn't think an apology was needed.
Anyway - what was that? One example compared to your steady stream.
Quote:
“And I'm not the only one who thinks you are rude, obnoxious and probably the most unfriendly person on here. There are 2 people on here that consistently back you up. No one else does. Its those people who see you as this.”
Didn't realise we were keeping a score of who was backing who up. But as far as I can tell you like to assume that anyone who doesn't specifically say they agree with me, must agree with you. That's a logical fallacy.
But if you do want to keep some sort of score, there are only a few posters who regularly bother with these discussions, and only really yourself and one or two others that seem to make the discussions such hard work.
By my arithmetic that certainly doesn't make it the 98% / 2% split you suggested earlier.
Quote:
“You would never be happy to apologise. Not once have you ever done that on here. Oh, but I have....”
If you apologised, I must have missed it. Post 292 certainly didn't seem much of an apology.
Quote:
“I wish you would stop banging on about hypocrisy though just because someone thinks you are what you have accused someone else as being.
That's hypocrisy!!”
No - the hypocrisy is that you call me rude and obnoxious, when its almost always you being rude.