Originally Posted by AMS13:
“Harriet Harman, started off working with PIE. That is something I find seriously offensive, together with a few other Labour Politicians, both male and female.
I find it strange how the feminists cannot handle Margaret Thatcher. The woman grew up in Grantham, a shop keeper's daughter. A working class woman who graduated in Chemistry, from Cambridge University and moved into politics late in life. She became the first female Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and was well respected on the International Stage. I remember working under Labour and before Maggie came to power. The UK was the laughing centre of the world and we could not even bury the dead.
Edwina Currie, born and educated in Liverpool, before graduating from Oxford. She made her way into Westminster and was part of Maggie Thatcher's cabinet. John Major did her no favours and their relationship was when they were both basic MPs.
Neither woman expected others to make allowances for their gender and so they were not going to give other females an easy ride, just owing to their gender. They grew up knowing if you want equality, it is a two way ride. You have to prove yourself, first and foremost and not expect an easy ride from others, all in the name of sisterhood.”
Yes Harriet Harman is shameful as was Tony Blair both of them what I would call 'tory light' but this thread was about Currie and thatcher. It was actually the banks in the 1980s that made it much easier for women to return to work and get promoted they were at the forefront of many progressive schemes including workplace nurseries and extended paid maternity leave.
If Thatcher did do anything for feminism it was accidentally when the wives of miners were so enraged by her policies and destruction of their communities that they became empowered to fight against her.
Originally Posted by Stockingfiller:
“The problem I have with Margaret Thatcher and Edwina Currie being role models is that they were ruddy awful at their jobs.”
Exactly this.
Originally Posted by
yellowlabbie:
“and so was I and I remember it very well and I agree with you, even if some on here choose to call us ignorant
”
Glad I am not alone.
Originally Posted by benjamini:
“Being in power is not like joining the masons. It's not to give unwarranted people a leg up the greasy pole. But it clearly demonstrated that hard work and tenacity did allow women into the higher echelons of work. That inspired many young women who realised it was possible and achievable.
I grew up when there was only one female teacher in my high school
I did not know a single female doctor. I did not know a single female bank manager. Nor a female dentist.
There were very very few visible female role models in the 50s and 60s.
Women stayed at home, or were the cashiers, tellers, receptionist nurses etc. that's how it was. To denigrate what was a remarkable achievement by any standards does yourself and others a disservice.
It was a mans world out there, no doubt about it, and to succeed took really guts and tenacity. A set of implants, a set of veneers and pretty face just didn't cut it. Still dos'nt.”
Whoever suggested that? I'm not talking about 'helping friends up the ladder' I'm talking about being in a position to have been able to make real changes to women's lives by encouraging and legislating for workplace equality. Thatcher never took that opportunity and instead dismantled local industry encouraged the start of mass produced consumerism and encouraged a very selfish society.