|
||||||||
Ofcom Instrastruture Report |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 561
|
Ofcom Instrastruture Report
http://infrastructure.ofcom.org.uk/
This website may help many. Shows you coverage for different types of mobile services : June 2014 |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,257
|
The map is very vague to say the least! I really wouldn't rely on it as its far from accurate. Best bet is to refer to mobile operator's maps. As for Superfast Broadband map its a joke
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,640
|
The site is very slow and rather broken for me.
Apparently there's no superfast broadband available (wrong) and 0% freeview/DAB coverage (very unlikely, there's excellent line of sight to a main transmitter, no problems with digital TV since 1998). It did get the 0% 4G coverage correct, so there's that
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 641
|
Thats as vague as it gets really, I could have produced a map on that standard with a day of google map api'ing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 363
|
Notwithstanding how vague it is... It does show some interesting comparisons between the operators on a regional level.
Look at 3g coverage along the eastern counties of central/northern England, and most of Wales, Scotland and the west country to see a stark difference between MBNL and Voda/O2. Let's hope that picture changes over the next 18 months with the Cornerstone rollout |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,319
|
site is way too slow to be used properly right now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 10,877
|
This is yet another indication that Vodafone's 3G coverage is pitiful and O2's is only marginally better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,319
|
Quote:
This is yet another indication that Vodafone's 3G coverage is pitiful and O2's is only marginally better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
This is yet another indication that Vodafone's 3G coverage is pitiful and O2's is only marginally better.
Give it 12-18 months, I reckon the network landscape will be very different! The areas Cornerstone have done (the Voda/o2 network share project), they have done well. My experience of using o2 in these areas is like night and day - also for users without 4g, the 3g is fast and DC. Once they've done the cities and start hitting the shires, we'll begin to see a very different picture. I hope! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
|
Quote:
This is yet another indication that Vodafone's 3G coverage is pitiful and O2's is only marginally better.
EE: 74% Three: 68% O2: 44% Vodafone: 33% The corresponding premises (outdoor) figures are: EE: 98% Three: 98% O2: 91% Vodafone: 87% |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:09.

