|
||||||||
Aldi Offer |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,599
|
Aldi Offer
Aldi have a good offer on Thursday:
Medion 4502 https://www.aldi.co.uk/en/specialbuy...on-life-p4502/ |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TheEssexSunshineCoast Clacton
Posts: 15,220
|
I have one of these laptops.
Its been fine for me over a year. Not sure about a smart phone though when in public. I would still find use for one as a spare though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
Better out there for that price
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,993
|
Its a Mediatek 6582 chip so reliable but not cutting edge, it would seem to be dual sim.
Page 36 http://www1.medion.de/downloads/down...pe=anleitungen And here http://www.gsmchoice.co.uk/en/catalogue/op3ndott/p4502/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
Its a Mediatek 6582 chip so reliable but not cutting edge, it would seem to be dual sim.
Page 36 http://www1.medion.de/downloads/down...pe=anleitungen And here http://www.gsmchoice.co.uk/en/catalogue/op3ndott/p4502/ Android 4.4, yes appears to be dual sim. Also seems to be sold under other brand names Op3n for example. Could be a good buy for some. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 12,290
|
Quote:
Better out there for that price
You may even say the actual phone is worth probably worth less than £50. The warranty is probably accounts for £30 of the cost. Aldi stores will probably be mobbed full of people wanting to buy a smartphone at a budget cost on Thursday. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 12,290
|
Does anybody know what sort of time these Aldi Special buys run out of stock, if they do?
Think about it. £79.99 for the smartphone, and pop your 3 PAYG sim in and buy the All In One 15 add-on with AYCE data. No need to take out any warranty. It seems wonderful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
Quote:
But with 3 years warranty included in the price it looks a fantastic offer.
You may even say the actual phone is worth probably worth less than £50. The warranty is probably accounts for £30 of the cost. Aldi stores will probably be mobbed full of people wanting to buy a smartphone at a budget cost on Thursday. Anyone choosing this say over a moto g will be making a mistake. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,993
|
Quote:
3 year warranty on this phone is pointless will be worth pennies to replace by then. All decent brand androids come with 2 year warranty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
Probably not i suspect but any way the purpose being to have the best phone for the money this isn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
This is very much like the Moto E and OK value with the warranty.
Mediatek is interesting. Ages ago I tried to work out the reason why my Dapeng Mediatek phone has the greatest GPS of any phone I have ever had. The closest I got to deducing is that Mediatek became a world leader in GPS technology a few years ago, releasing a standalone product far better than the old reliable Sirf 3. So if Qualcomm bung everything in dirt cheap, are Mediatek just dirt cheap with a fantastic real GPS ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 577
|
They have the res wrong.
It's qHD which is Quarter HD, not Quad HD... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Quad HD sounds better and they give the resolution, so real harm done. (and no one uses Quad HD for 4K)
Its funny how things stick. 4K stuck because marketing wise it is 4 times 1080p (2K) So 4K you naturally think 4 times, which is correct too, even though 4K technically describes a near 4000 pixel width. Ain't 4K something like 2160p ? I forget. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,746
|
Also like my current phone, it doesn't do 800mhz and with Three possibly going with 800mhz, some like me will lose out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 577
|
Quote:
Quad HD sounds better and they give the resolution, so real harm done. (and no one uses Quad HD for 4K)
Its funny how things stick. 4K stuck because marketing wise it is 4 times 1080p (2K) So 4K you naturally think 4 times, which is correct too, even though 4K technically describes a near 4000 pixel width. Ain't 4K something like 2160p ? I forget. With 4k it transition from using the vertical resolution to the horizontal. Gone from full HD 1080p, instead of being FULLER HD 2160p it's 4k or for 4000 horizontal pixels (not quite, but with some standards it's 4000). |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 577
|
Quote:
Also like my current phone, it doesn't do 800mhz and with Three possibly going with 800mhz, some like me will lose out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,274
|
Quote:
Its funny how things stick. 4K stuck because marketing wise it is 4 times 1080p (2K)
So 4K you naturally think 4 times, which is correct too, even though 4K technically describes a near 4000 pixel width. It's generally used for resolutions about 2048x1536. I've also heard it used to describe QHD (not qHD) resolutions as well. The whole thing is pretty ridiculous, no foresight at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Quote:
2K is never used to describe 1080HD though.
It's generally used for resolutions about 2048x1536. .... The whole thing is pretty ridiculous, no foresight at all. The 2K thing was made to look daft when 4K came, but hey they decided to use the term 2K for the iPad so who are we to argue a technical point ? ![]() Verbally, I use 2K+ for the iPad. At least it fits in with me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
But with 3 years warranty included in the price it looks a fantastic offer.
You may even say the actual phone is worth probably worth less than £50. The warranty is probably accounts for £30 of the cost. Aldi stores will probably be mobbed full of people wanting to buy a smartphone at a budget cost on Thursday. Try buying a screen for them you will find its as costly as the phone these phones good for your gran or kids and are like Andrex tissuse if you want a cheap andriod check out this ebay item number 201239605243 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Jump on top of it 3 times and it is certainly worth absolutely zero like any other phone costing from £20 to £750.
So what, this is a decent cheap phone. If there is a ridge for the screen it might be a good 5 times more drop friendly than a smooth format non ridge phone. So do you suggest banning grans and kids from certain phones ? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18.



